• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports

We should probably ban them then. For how long though? 🙏
I'd normally be loathe to ban someone for something about character ages, and it might not even be untrue, but their attitude just doesn't seem good. Dismissiveness and passive-aggressiveness towards Twilight-OP, citing something they themselves wrote as their source, and doing so in a condescending "appeal to authority" kind of way, no less...

I'd say at least a moderate ban, mainly for the bad attitude and questionable citation behaviour. Strongly encourage them to change their ways, but their attitude leads me to think that might not happen. I wouldn't object to a long-term ban, to be honest.
It was just a key without any statistics belonging to it, so it was still inappropriate, but not very serious.

I gave a warning. 🙏

All good. I agree with you. I understood their intent and idea, but obviously they still shouldn't do it. A warning seems well and truly sufficient here.
 
I'd normally be loathe to ban someone for something about character ages, and it might not even be untrue, but their attitude just doesn't seem good. Dismissiveness and passive-aggressiveness towards Twilight-OP, citing something they themselves wrote as their source, and doing so in a condescending "appeal to authority" kind of way, no less...

I'd say at least a moderate ban, mainly for the bad attitude and questionable citation behaviour. Strongly encourage them to change their ways, but their attitude leads me to think that might not happen. I wouldn't object to a long-term ban, to be honest.
Well, maybe a warning to stop and follow our rules or get banned is sufficient? 🙏
 
Well, maybe a warning to stop and follow our rules or get banned is sufficient? 🙏
Maybe. I guess they don't have to be banned outright. I just think the disrespect of Twilight-OP coupled with citing their own edits as an authority is a bad sign.

Okay, how about a stern warning, with the note that a failure to heed or respect that warning leads to a ban?
 
but their attitude just doesn't seem good. Dismissiveness and passive-aggressiveness towards Twilight-OP, citing something they themselves wrote as their source
That all happened before they spoke with me directly on Discord. The rollback was also reverted before they contacted me there, where I explained that they should revert things back to their previous state and then join the forum to discuss changes in the verse thread before making edits. They were actually very polite and understanding about it. I think they simply forgot to fix it, and since I’ve been dealing with internet issues over the past few days, I wasn’t able to revert everything myself at the time. Even posting this message is taking me a long while. My apologies for not clarifying earlier. That said, I do think the ban is fair, given their behavior of altering other wikis just to justify edits on ours.
 
That all happened before they spoke with me directly on Discord. The rollback was also reverted before they contacted me there, where I explained that they should revert things back to their previous state and then join the forum to discuss changes in the verse thread before making edits. They were actually very polite and understanding about it.
Okay, so they do intend to join and help out. That's good, although I can't say I trust them.
I think they simply forgot to fix it, and since I’ve been dealing with internet issues over the past few days, I wasn’t able to revert everything myself at the time. Even posting this message is taking me a long while. My apologies for not clarifying earlier.
No problem. You work hard and well here, and internet and real life problems happen. Hard to believe as it may seem, the dog really can eat the router, as they say.
That said, I do think the ban is fair, given their behavior of altering other wikis just to justify edits on ours.
Sadly, yes. I think a stern warning at bare minimum, although if they're genuinely trying to do right then maybe no need for a ban outright.
 
Okay, so they do intend to join and help out. That's good, although I can't say I trust them.
They had their acc rejected, so I told them to contact ant on his msg wall, which they did. So yeah.
Sadly, yes. I think a stern warning at bare minimum, although if they're genuinely trying to do right then maybe no need for a ban outright.
That works too.
 
A user added a whole bunch of stuff to this profile without a CRT

Some is wrong like that Regeneration upgrade and others is really irrelevant stuff like the Warp key that was destroyed literally on it's first appearance and drains him dry so it's not like it would be handy in a match
 
Last edited:
I was looking through some profiles and I found this series of bumps under Dalesean027's profile made by Arch0207. Is that even allowed?
Well isn’t the cooldown (lmao) for bumping at least 24 hours? It seems like he’s abiding by that rule if you look at the timestamps of all his bumps. Is it desperate? Sure, but I don’t think that warrants a warning. Although staff may see it differently.

EDIT: Nvm, his other bumps were on the same day. Although he did mellow out on his recent bumps.
 
Well isn’t the cooldown (lmao) for bumping at least 24 hours? It seems like he’s abiding by that rule if you look at the timestamps of all his bumps. Is it desperate? Sure, but I don’t think that warrants a warning. Although staff may see it differently.

EDIT: Nvm, his other bumps were on the same day. Although he did mellow out on his recent bumps.
They've bumped 3 times within 8 hours on Sept 12, 6 times within 12 hours on Sept 13, 3 times within a minute on Sept 16, and 6 times again within 4 hours on Sept 18. I'd probably tell them to stop it, but hey that's just me.

Also I just realized this isn't Rule Violations Thread, so I'm gonna take it over there.
 
I think that warnings are likely sufficient for now, especially as Dinosaur thailand seemed reasonable after they were reprimanded. 🙏
 
I think that warnings are likely sufficient for now, especially as Dinosaur thailand seemed reasonable after they were reprimanded. 🙏
A user added a whole bunch of stuff to this profile without a CRT

Some is wrong like that Regeneration upgrade and others is really irrelevant stuff like the Warp key that was destroyed literally on it's first appearance and drains him dry so it's not like it would be handy in a match
 
Last edited by a moderator:
A user added a whole bunch of stuff to this profile without a CRT

Some is wrong like that Regeneration upgrade and others is really irrelevant stuff like the Warp key that was destroyed literally on it's first appearance and drains him dry so it's not like it would be handy in a match
I will give them a warning. 🙏
 
Since the vandal did not stop after my previous warning, I blocked them for 3 months, to give them the time to learn our rules. 🙏

 
Back
Top