• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Wiki Vandalism Reports


Low quality ability addition that seems to have been made without approval. I already rolled it back and left a message on their wall.
 
Last edited:
This user seems to have made a string of unaccepted edits starting here.

Collectively they've raised a Wall level Subsonic character to City level and Relativistic.

I reverted the edits.

I also left a warning on their profile.
 
Last edited:
Blatant vandalism.

I already reverted it and left a warning, but this is a new user whose only edit is to change Alien X from 1-B to 2-A.

Since this person just made such a change, and the page is Tier 1, it should be locked anyway.
 
Last edited:
Blatant vandalism.

I already reverted it and left a warning, but this is a new user whose only edit is to change Alien X from 1-B to 2-A.

Since this person just made such a change, and the page is Tier 1, it should be locked anyway.
I want to edit alien x back to higher 2-A to make sure it matches his true power
Probably a clueless guy, so i think a warning and a guideline for him how to do thing in our wiki is a proper course of action, for now
 
reverted the profile

Strange, after looking at the user, they made 3 edits in 2022, the first edit added Omnipresent but then he removed it, the 3rd edit is just render change, the newest which is the one i reverted

@TWILIGHT-OP @LephyrTheRevanchist idk what we should do, so sorry for the ping
Extreme vandalism like giving 1-A ratings to random profiles is a permaban offense in our rules. So I have done it.

If another staff members wants to reduce it, it's fine too with me (a final chance as it were, considering their low activity).
 
No. Malicious troll vandalism from members who have not done a lot of productive other activities, and do not simply seem clueless, almost always means that they are just here to deliberately harm our wiki. A permanent ban is appropriate. Thanks again. 🙏
 
I said it because I thought the user might not be familiar with our rules and regulations.
 
Extreme vandalism like giving 1-A ratings to random profiles is a permaban offense in our rules. So I have done it.

If another staff members wants to reduce it, it's fine too with me (a final chance as it were, considering their low activity).
i'm fine with permaban, from his activity history, i feel like they doesn't want to contribute to the wiki anyway
 
Not against the rules at all, but we don't use birthday's on the wiki, so a message might be good.
 
EddisherSound and I handled it. 🙏
 
User revamping profiles with no links to crt's. Likely a productive vandal.

 

 
User revamping profiles with no links to crt's. Likely a productive vandal.

I gave a warning message and reverted the seemingly clueless vandalism. 🙏
 

EddisherSound reverted the changes, and I gave a warning. 🙏
 
User revamping profiles with no links to crt's. Likely a productive vandal.

I gave a warning message and reverted the seemingly clueless vandalism. 🙏
Both of these were Accepted
 
Okay. The revisions should be properly formatted when applied though, and a link to the content revision thread in which they were accepted should be placed in the edit-summary box for each page in conjunction.

I will handle it though, but I am tired. 🙏
 
Okay. The revisions should be properly formatted when applied though, and a link to the content revision thread in which they were accepted should be placed in the edit-summary box for each page in conjunction.

I will handle it though, but I am tired. 🙏
I asked @TWILIGHT-OP for help, they have taken care of it.
 
Back
Top