• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Why are the mods so mean?

Status
Not open for further replies.
you know, you can just leave if you thought you're not appreciated

not that you can take criticism accurately when they all say "adding mathemathic theory that not a lot of people know into your manga may not gonna be received well" but you perceived it as "you can't do this"

so, if you don't like that critic, then I suggest to go to other place, maybe a writer's hub, to discuss on how to make a better and coherent story telling

also, didn't FCOC banned tier 1 and 0 characters
 
That's not how it works. Sonic for example doesn't blow up the universe he's in automatically because he's tier 2 in base. The level of destruction in fiction will always be inconsistent regardless of ap.

I'm only saying it in that way because there is simply no way it will work, and it shows with the fact that nobody here is on your side. It'd be much better for your manga without all of this mathematics and unnecessary level of power. Believing that a narrative can work that way is plain delusional and everyone agrees on this. That's hwy everyone is telling you the same stuff.

Anyway, i'm gonna be the bigger person and stop replying, i don't see the point of talking back and forth if you just refuse to take advice from anyone.
I know you won't reply but I have one last thing to say. It's not impossible. It will be very difficult but I've found ways to overcome things thought to be impossible before. I will make it work. You don't have to believe me since I haven't done it yet but once I do, you will have to believe me.
 
you know, you can just leave if you thought you're not appreciated

not that you can take criticism accurately when they all say "adding mathemathic theory that not a lot of people know into your manga may not gonna be received well" but you perceived it as "you can't do this"

so, if you don't like that critic, then I suggest to go to other place, maybe a writer's hub, to discuss on how to make a better and coherent story telling

also, didn't FCOC banned tier 1 and 0 characters
I would leave if I had somewhere to go. I don't. I asked people to help me make my own wiki so I could move there but no one has agreed to help me.
 
You see power only. You do not see narrative. That I what I gather from all my interactions with you.

Notice again how no one is on your side…

Look in the mirror.

Good day to you.
No one is on my side because they refuse to accept any other power scaling system than the one this wiki uses. That's probably the real reason no one will help me with my wiki. They don't want my power scaling system to have a chance to succeed.
 
No one is on my side because they refuse to accept any other power scaling system than the one this wiki uses. That's probably the real reason no one will help me with my wiki. They don't want my power scaling system to have a chance to succeed.
No. It's just that nobody knows how or even if they knew they wouldn't wasrw their time on it for you because why would they?
 
No one is on my side because they refuse to accept any other power scaling system than the one this wiki uses. That's probably the real reason no one will help me with my wiki. They don't want my power scaling system to have a chance to succeed.
888.jpg
 
Ideally, my wiki would use the same format as VSBW but have some rule changes and use my own scaling system instead of this one.
 
Nah, they have to go through a review thread first
should've kept that rule imo
I would leave if I had somewhere to go. I don't. I asked people to help me make my own wiki so I could move there but no one has agreed to help me.
sounds like you arrived at the wrong hood, just type any forum that has any writers in google (I wanna recommend scribblehub, but I was not familiar with that website), and people will gladly (hopefully) give you advice. doesn't need to make your own web, just go to like, scribblehub/webnovel/wattpad or something and post them, see if it's perceived well.

but if you are here solely to add your original work into FCOC, well, for powerscaling reason, it won't be perceived well in this community.

anyway, I'm out
 
Nobody has to deal with you even now you know that right? Heck it's not even "dealing with you" it's just a normal conversation.
I honestly don't want to be here anymore. I don't want to deal with them. I just don't have any options.
 
This is just sad
1. Said outerversal characters don't even exist yet in your work
2. Even if they did, YOU mentioned that you're not planning on adding them to any of the wikis nor are you planning on conforming to the wikis standards
3. On the off-chance your manga gets popular enough to get added here by someone else, it won't be allowed because works from powerscalers aren't allowed here. Not to mention that there's evidence of you blatantly pushing high end powerscaling into your work. SCP was nuked for less.
You're just wasting everyone's time here
 
This is just sad
1. Said outerversal characters don't even exist yet in your work
2. Even if they did, YOU mentioned that you're not planning on adding them to any of the wikis nor are you planning on conforming to the wikis standards
3. On the off-chance your manga gets popular enough to get added here by someone else, it won't be allowed because works from powerscalers aren't allowed here. Not to mention that there's evidence of you blatantly pushing high end powerscaling into your work. SCP was nuked for less.
You're just wasting everyone's time here
I want to leave. I can't leave because my wiki is not functional and I don't know how to make it functional. No one is willing to help me make it functional or teach me how to do it. What do you want me to do?
 
Because if they did, they wouldn't have to deal with me ever again. I know they hate me.
You are being delusional. You’re talking about going beyond omnipotent and other blatantly stupid stuff. Just take the loss or take the advice being given to you. It’s getting tiresome watching this.
I want to leave. I can't leave because my wiki is not functional and I don't know how to make it functional. No one is willing to help me make it functional or teach me how to do it. What do you want me to do?
Dude literally just use Google
 
I'd think about posting it if I didn't feel like everyone here hates me and would attack me.

I mean, I don't think anyone here hates you. If anything some people have been a bit blunt and harsh with their criticisms, but if all you're trying to do is make your own tiering system for your own wiki, that's fine.

It is true though that starting off with the goal of "strongest thing ever in anything ever" pretty much invariably leads to poor writing quality unless it's done in a very tongue-in-cheek way like One Punch Man. So I would recommend letting that come more naturally rather than having it be the explicit goal.

I'm sure people would be interested in your characters regardless of their tiers if they're cool characters. I mean, just as an example one of my favorite "strongest" characters probably wouldn't get some crazy gigaversal tier by our standards, but I don't care and will still consider her The Strongest™ because she has the vibes for it.
 
I don’t plan to keep track of the rest of the post, but I would personally like you to elaborate on what you mean by this.
Take 1/3*3. Leave it in fractional form and you get 3/3 or 1. Multiply the decimal form instead and you get 0.9999999... repeating forever which is an infinitesimal smaller than 1. So, there is an infinitesimal discrepancy between the two methods of multiplication in the case of repeating decimals. The difference is so small that it would not matter in almost every circumstance since infinitesimals are indistinguishable from 0 through conventional means but it is still a difference which means one of the methods has to be flawed.
 
Take 1/3*3. Leave it in fractional form and you get 3/3 or 1. Multiply the decimal form instead and you get 0.9999999... repeating forever which is an infinitesimal smaller than 1. So, there is an infinitesimal discrepancy between the two methods of multiplication in the case of repeating decimals. The difference is so small that it would not matter in almost every circumstance since infinitesimals are indistinguishable from 0 through conventional means but it is still a difference which means one of the methods has to be flawed.
This is not true in the real numbers, though. 0.999..=1 under any of the standard definitions of both. This is a well-documented fact that has been known for quite a while, actually. Any infinite decimal sequence is defined as the limit of the partial sums at finite levels, e.g. 0.33… is the limit of (0.3, 0.33, 0.333, …), which is always a real numbers, because this is a Cauchy sequence, and the real numbers are complete. The limit of the sequence (0.9, 0.99, 0.999, …) is equal to 1.
 
I mean, I don't think anyone here hates you. If anything some people have been a bit blunt and harsh with their criticisms, but if all you're trying to do is make your own tiering system for your own wiki, that's fine.

It is true though that starting off with the goal of "strongest thing ever in anything ever" pretty much invariably leads to poor writing quality unless it's done in a very tongue-in-cheek way like One Punch Man. So I would recommend letting that come more naturally rather than having it be the explicit goal.

I'm sure people would be interested in your characters regardless of their tiers if they're cool characters. I mean, just as an example one of my favorite "strongest" characters probably wouldn't get some crazy gigaversal tier by our standards, but I don't care and will still consider her The Strongest™ because she has the vibes for it.
Thank you.
 
Take 1/3*3. Leave it in fractional form and you get 3/3 or 1. Multiply the decimal form instead and you get 0.9999999... repeating forever which is an infinitesimal smaller than 1. So, there is an infinitesimal discrepancy between the two methods of multiplication in the case of repeating decimals. The difference is so small that it would not matter in almost every circumstance since infinitesimals are indistinguishable from 0 through conventional means but it is still a difference which means one of the methods has to be flawed.
0.999 repeating is equal to 1 in real numbers.
 
This is not true in the real numbers, though. 0.999..=1 under any of the standard definitions of both. This is a well-documented fact that has been known for quite a while, actually. Any infinite decimal sequence is defined as the limit of the partial sums at finite levels, e.g. 0.33… is the limit of (0.3, 0.33, 0.333, …), which is always a real numbers, because this is a Cauchy sequence, and the real numbers are complete. The limit of the sequence (0.9, 0.99, 0.999, …) is equal to 1.
I haven't taken calculus yet so I can't dispute this but I don't see how they could be the same when there is a difference that is non-zero. Sure, the difference is infinitely small but that's still a difference.
 
I haven't taken calculus yet so I can't dispute this but I don't see how they could be the same when there is a difference that is non-zero. Sure, the difference is infinitely small but that's still a difference.
Then what number is between 0.9999 repeating to infinity and 1?
 
I haven't taken calculus yet so I can't dispute this but I don't see how they could be the same when there is a difference that is non-zero. Sure, the difference is infinitely small but that's still a difference.
There is no difference. 0.99…9 n times is always smaller than 1 by some small amount in some way relative to n, but this is the limit of the sequence.

If you’d like, I can link you some resources better explaining this and the Archimedean property of the real numbers(between any two real numbers, there is another).

Also, fwiw, I haven’t taken calc either, I’m self-educated.
 
Okay fine. I made a mistake with that. Doesn't change my point though.
To be clear, I’m not agreeing or disagreeing with your arguments or anything, I haven’t really read them. I don’t mean this in a rude way, if it comes off that way, I’m just only interested in math, not tiering systems.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top