Which Legend of Zelda lore books are allowed?

[Jason_Courne]

On the main Legend of Zelda page, the "Hyrule Encyclopedia" is noted as "unviable" to use, however there is no book named the "Hyrule Encyclopedia", there is

1. The Hyrule Historia
2. And The Legend of Zelda Encyclopedia

So which one is discarded? I'm assuming it's the Hyrule Historia (as we currently use the LoZ Encyclopedia to support 3-A Triforce), but I'm hoping to get a confirmation

 

[XXKINGXX69]

Yes

 

[Dust_Collector]

Neither one is disregarded, we use both. It's just that we don't use information that directly contradict the games. No idea why it's only the encyclopedia that gets a note about it since the same would apply to any guidebooks for Zelda, hell it applies to guidebooks from any series.

 

[Qawsedf234]

Bump.

What are we changing @Dust_Collector

 

[Dust_Collector]

Guess we're just changing the note that says the encyclopedia is unviable to have it instead say it and other guides are usable with the exception of anything that directly contradicts the games (Like the weird Majora stuff from encyclopedia).