• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Where do non- metric spaces fit in the tier system?

3,295
1,271
In a recent post, it was said that the tier system was based on Hausdorff measure. So I am wondering where non-metric spaces would fit, since Hausdorff measure cannot be used to measure their size.
 
I mean, you're talking about spaces without what in a common sense would be called a concept of size. So doesn't the question answer itself?
Edit: To be more clear - it's untierable.
 
Last edited:
I mean, you're talking about spaces without what in a common sense would be called a concept of size. So doesn't the question answer itself?
Edit: To be more clear - it's untierable.
Not necessarily the concept of size, but rather distance between two points is undefined.
 
Not necessarily the concept of size, but rather distance between two points is undefined.
Unless you mean a metrizable space, which just doesn't have a metric, you will find that defining a measure that is size in common sense on the space will be pretty much impossible.
Like, sure, you can take yourself an arbitrary space and define the dirac measure on it, but that is not size in common sense of the term.
 
Unless you mean a metrizable space, which just doesn't have a metric, you will find that defining a measure that is size in common sense on the space will be pretty much impossible.
Like, sure, you can take yourself an arbitrary space and define the dirac measure on it, but that is not size in common sense of the term.
So such a space would just be unquantifiable with the current system?

Could it be a candidate for the "cosmology +1" rule if the cosmology was embedded within it?
 
For the +1 you would need to be able to confirm that it is in some sense infinitely bigger, a property not every embedding space would have.
 
For the +1 you would need to be able to confirm that it is in some sense infinitely bigger, a property not every embedding space would have.
Wouldn’t this create a catch-22?

How could you determine the size of a non-metric space if “defining a measure that is size in common sense on the space will be pretty much impossible?”
 
Back
Top