-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
- 10,748
- 6,476
People can take time to come up with arguments, I myself need do so frequently. It's not a fallacy.
- 26,116
- 3,649
Fallacy is a flawed argument, stalling for time to get an argument isn't really a fallacy.
Someone not being able to bring proof cannot say that the argument still can go both ways, but he can search for one and retaliate with what he came up with later.
Someone not being able to bring proof cannot say that the argument still can go both ways, but he can search for one and retaliate with what he came up with later.
- 47
- 3
- Thread starter
- #5
the thing is though, he literally started the debate with no proof, kept using the singular argument that "Boruto would win because of a timeskip", then said "the debate isnt over i just need more proof"
Now that I double-read the threat, I think the "Boruto would win because of a timeskip" is the fallacy part-
Now that I double-read the threat, I think the "Boruto would win because of a timeskip" is the fallacy part-
- 26,116
- 3,649
That'a just buden of proof.
- 26,116
- 3,649
It's nothin'
Similar threads
