What is Regenerationn Negation?

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

Something that was brought up here, I'm questioning the specifics of Regenerationn Negation.

We're all aware of the conventional Regen Neg, Character A hits Character B with an attack imbued with something to stop regen, or just attacks so hard the regen simply can't keep up. But what about other forms?

Someone like Devilman (Composite), who constantly uses transmutation or fusionism to bypass Regenerationn up to Mid-Godly. Or in this current case, BB (Fate/Extra CCC), who can absorb people's mind, body, and soul to prevent Regenerationn. Nothing to regenerate, because they're in her.

Should Regen Negation stem out from just normal Negation? Should it have two types, one conventionally attacking the regen, and another bypassing it? Or is it not Regen Neg at all?

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

Important bump.

 

[Wokistan]

Some abilities wouldn't really interact with Regenerationn (though some people in godly regen wouldn't care about transmutation and absorption but that's not important). This is not the same thing. Negation of resurrection is to outright deny the regen with something that ordinarily would not be an issue. An example is The Daughters of Oryx, who have death manipulation that can kill concepts and those with Mid-Godly. Standard issue death manipulation is no object for a Mid-Godly, but they inflict a more potent and true death, letting them negate it.

 

[The_Causality]

I will just copy-paste what I've said in the other thread.

Regen Négation = Preventing someone to regen. If someone is able to absorb your soul and integrate it in his body, it negate your regen since you can't regen your soul, it still exist, basically there is nothing to regenerate since the soul isn't destroyed.

It's a form of Regen Negation.

But I can agree that we need to specify some case of regen negation

 

[Schnee_One]

I don't think we need to specify it tbh.

In BBs case it's absorbtion, unless the opponent can regen from mind and soul that should be clear that you can't regen from that.

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

The usual regen neg standard I've seen here was if it attacks the regen itself, not exactly bypassing it. Because it isn't damaged, it's just in her, leaving nothing to regen.

 

[Elizhaa]

I don't think we need to specify it tbh.
In BBs case it's absorbtion, unless the opponent can regen from mind and soul that should be clear that you can't regen from that.

I agree.

I think it is better if the case of Regenerationn Negation is judged on a case by case basis since the feats tend varied a lot.

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

But that's my thing. Should we differentiate between ATTACKING the Regenerationn, or BYPASSING the Regenerationn.

Do they equate to the same thing, or what?

 

[Elizhaa]

But that's my thing. Should we differentiate between ATTACKING the Regenerationn, or BYPASSING the Regenerationn.
Do they equate to the same thing, or what?

It is needless to differentiate; they basically equated to the same thing in the end which is Regenerationn Negation.

Depending on the Regenerationn Negation's methodology or feats some characters can resist it and others cannot. Hence, I said it is better to leave the Regenerationn Negation's judgment on a case by case basis.

 

[Milly_Rocking_Bandit]

Alrighty, thank you.

 

[Elizhaa]

Glad to help~