• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Vs battles wiki pet peeves

Status
Not open for further replies.
Da3ggman said:
Here’s one of my rare once a season comments on this thread:

I have a pet peeve of people abusing the report system over extraordinarily minor things in order to punish a person they don’t like.

I guess I’ll just bite the bullet and admit that yes, this is about Fuji. I’m not accusing anyone specifically of anything, but find it really suspicious that whenever she starts trying to downgrade popular verses like Dragon Ball and GoW, all of a sudden she’s getting reported every other week for something as basic as asking ******* questions in bold.

Look, I get it, I’m not exactly a huge fan of her either, but certain people need to grow up and actually argue their points instead of crying and pulling the “S-She hurt my fweelings!” card to the admins. If you can’t handle someone being slightly aggressive, then you should probably get off of the internet as a whole.
Click to expand...
This was discussed recently, as of message 7955 of this thread. I don't know a lot about that situation, but I have seen her reported a lot and not punished, so I assume it's true that something suspicious is happening.
 
Abstractions said:
Excited to see it in 2026.
Click to expand...
IMG_3554.png

I literally linked the thread earlier and it went through like months ago
 
SilentLyfe said:
My current pet peeve is the general apathy I now seem to have for CRTs. Whether it’d be making one or simply arguing in one it just seems like way to much work these days. Especially in the more controversial verses.
Click to expand...
If you expect controversial verses not have at minimum 2-3 pages long debate, you are dreaming hard
 
Here's a major pet peeve of mine that slowly changed my way of battleboarding over the years. I've grown tired of sweaty wall-text debates. Y'know, when someone writes an essay intricately addressing every little detail about your own big analysis, maybe even taking points out of context, so then you respond with your own essay while adding extra clarifications, then the other person responds to all the details, including the extra clarifications, and so on, making the quantity of paragraphs keep growing, and then we forget exactly what's addressing what and it takes days just to agree on some of the points? It's so annoying. Nowadays, I try to avoid that as much as I can, and I find it weird how some people actually find that fun. No wonder a lot of people think power scaling is cringe. A lot of battleboarders are so overbearing and obsessed with "debunking." I mean it verbatim, they use the specific word "debunk" more than any other notorious netizens I've seen.
 
My current pet peeve is; people and groups (death battle, SCP) have referenced this site for catch-all definitive power-scaling. Some people even believe that anything that is on this site is 100% accurate and true to the source material, when that is not always the case.

Some verses even get huge CRT's or end up nuked all the time; while also having actual faked scans. I digress on this line though.
 
Quibster said:
My current pet peeve is; people and groups (death battle, SCP) have referenced this site for catch-all definitive power-scaling. Some people even believe that anything that is on this site is 100% accurate and true to the source material, when that is not always the case.

Some verses even get huge CRT's or end up nuked all the time; while also having actual faked scans. I digress on this line though.
Click to expand...
Is that really true? From what I've seen everyone collectively agrees this site ******* sucks at accurate powerscaling.
 
James_Plays_4_Games said:
Here's a major pet peeve of mine that slowly changed my way of battleboarding over the years. I've grown tired of sweaty wall-text debates. Y'know, when someone writes an essay intricately addressing every little detail about your own big analysis, maybe even taking points out of context, so then you respond with your own essay while adding extra clarifications, then the other person responds to all the details, including the extra clarifications, and so on, making the quantity of paragraphs keep growing, and then we forget exactly what's addressing what and it takes days just to agree on some of the points? It's so annoying. Nowadays, I try to avoid that as much as I can, and I find it weird how some people actually find that fun. No wonder a lot of people think power scaling is cringe. A lot of battleboarders are so overbearing and obsessed with "debunking." I mean it verbatim, they use the specific word "debunk" more than any other notorious netizens I've seen.
Click to expand...
Womp Womp

What's worse is when the other guy spams fallacies
 
James_Plays_4_Games said:
It's so annoying. Nowadays, I try to avoid that as much as I can
Click to expand...
Yeah. I'm in the same boat. Even aside from the general annoyance factor, those sorts of arguments just prevent any meaningful voting because no one wants to sift through the mostly aimless arguing. So I try my best to focus on the most important details
 
James_Plays_4_Games said:
A lot of battleboarders are so overbearing and obsessed with "debunking." I mean it verbatim, they use the specific word "debunk" more than any other notorious netizens I've seen.
Click to expand...
You see it's fun when you're completely in the right and your word is accepted as fact while your opposition is completely wrong and doesn't deserve to have any opinions whatsoever
 
DaMonkeMan said:
Is that really true?
Click to expand...
I've seen half the cast on the Death Battle Podcast use this site as reference material for point of argument/subject several times in the past. Not all the time, but it's more-so uncommon than common. Mainly, it happens when everyone gets confused at hearing something that is possibly contradictory to the match-up discussion-- and they pull out their phones to check here.

SCP is another case though. Writers have used on-site terminology and scaling verbatim to achieve tier 1 hax-- which is part of why the verse is on the chopping block (if it isn't dead already).

And yeah the site does have a bad rep. Although people who search "Powerscaling (their favorite verse)" in search engines will almost always see this site in the top 3 results-- and believe it's a good reference. I really wish there was a disclaimer somewhere.
 
Deagonx said:
Yeah. I'm in the same boat. Even aside from the general annoyance factor, those sorts of arguments just prevent any meaningful voting because no one wants to sift through the mostly aimless arguing. So I try my best to focus on the most important details
Click to expand...
Irc sometimes CRT goes to 5 pages+ because of the lack of staff replies which would solve the matter way faster
 
Lloydblitzed said:
Have you ever seen a 11 pages long CRT 👀?
Click to expand...
If you knew...

Quibster said:
I've seen half the cast on the Death Battle Podcast use this site as reference material for point of argument/subject several times in the past. Not all the time, but it's more-so uncommon than common. Mainly, it happens when everyone gets confused at hearing something that is possibly contradictory to the match-up discussion-- and they pull out their phones to check here.
Click to expand...
Did they ever direct mentioned VSBW?

Quibster said:
SCP is another case though. Writers have used on-site terminology and scaling verbatim to achieve tier 1 hax-- which is part of why the verse is on the chopping block (if it isn't dead already).
Click to expand...
Ngl, i think the amount of SCP writers who cares about powerscaling or have Tier 1 shenanigans on their stories is inflated
 
Accelerated_Evolution said:
If you knew...
Click to expand...
Longest one I've participated in so far:
vsbattles.com

Ninjago's Tiering Problem

I do have issues with the merge. So we know all the Main 17 realms were effected by this collison event all the realms including based off from Dr S1 and S2 include other planets and stars that were there before this would mean the "spaces" of these "realms" includes planets and stars following...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
  • Locked
Wiki Destabilization Discussion Thread
Replies
7
Views
1K
Sir_Ovens
Sir_Ovens
ThePrimalHunter
FC/OC vs Joke Battles Wiki Matches
Replies
1
Views
3K
H3110l12345I20
H3110l12345I20
Rikimarox2
Lightning is the Only Way General Discussion
Replies
31
Views
1K
Rikimarox2
Rikimarox2
HonestlyBored24
What is the most Powerscaling piece of fiction you’ve ever seen?
3 4 5
Replies
194
Views
20K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
GarrixianXD
VS Battles Is Nonsense / Delete My Account UwU
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
Epiccheev
Epiccheev
Back
Top