• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Vs battles wiki pet peeves

Status
Not open for further replies.
A "favorite" pet peeve of mine:

When a user claims to be a supporter, opponent or neutral to a verse but only knows tangentially about the series, if at all.

It really annoys me when I find a verse page where it's clear that most of the members only know as much of the verse as the wiki page summarizes them at most.
 
Profiles with abilities such as Acausality (Type 5) or Transduality (Type 4) or whatever without justifications so I'm just confused on how they have these ******* abilities.
 
Bobsican said:
A "favorite" pet peeve of mine:

When a user claims to be a supporter, opponent or neutral to a verse but only knows tangentially about the series, if at all.

It really annoys me when I find a verse page where it's clear that most of the members only know as much of the verse as the wiki page summarizes them at most.
Click to expand...
That's partly the reason why I don't add myself to those lists. I get they can be helpful and the intention is good however it's pretty arbitrary plus anyone can add themselves those lists making them come off as redundant.

If I'm knowledgeable about a verse and I believe I can add something constructive to the discussion then I'll join in myself.
 
azontr said:
Profiles with abilities such as Acausality (Type 5) or Transduality (Type 4) or whatever without justifications so I'm just confused on how they have these ******* abilities.
Click to expand...
Even worse is when they don't specify the type.
 
Another one:

People who make matches with absurdly haxxed characters such as (Archaon the Everchosen, Yakagi Suimei, Anos Voldigoad, Rimuru Tempest, Any Warhammer Fantasy character pretty much, DnD characters, Elder Scrolls characters) while putting them up against people they know have 0 chance of winning, to which they proceed to constantly change the opponent in hopes of finding somebody who can go up against monsters for no reason which is annoying.
 
azontr said:
Another one:

People who make matches with absurdly haxxed characters such as (Archaon the Everchosen, Yakagi Suimei, Anos Voldigoad, Rimuru Tempest, Any Warhammer Fantasy character pretty much, DnD characters, Elder Scrolls characters) while putting them up against people they know have 0 chance of winning, to which they proceed to constantly change the opponent in hopes of finding somebody who can go up against monsters for no reason which is annoying.
Click to expand...
Mood also Vs matches where both characters are under revisions and the OP is actually aware of it yet still posts the Vs thread anyway... :/
 
When people throw around struggling with street level shit to discredit anything above tier 7
 
Starting to get tired of random people commenting "Obvious troll. Ban them/away" on the rule violations report thread. Why do they do it? Do they think they have authority on if someone should be banned or not for giving tier 0 to some random cartoon character nobody cares about? It grinded my gears when someone used that same line against a very helpful and contributing member of the wiki because of a mistake they made while editing a profile.
 
Shmooply said:
Starting to get tired of random people commenting "Obvious troll. Ban them/away" on the rule violations report thread. Why do they do it? Do they think they have authority on if someone should be banned or not for giving tier 0 to some random cartoon character nobody cares about? It grinded my gears when someone used that same line against a very helpful and contributing member of the wiki because of a mistake they made while editing a profile.
Click to expand...
No offense to anyone, but most of the time the people clogging up the RVR thread are just the same people all the time.
 
I mostly comment there because I have nothing else better to do with my horrible life.

And I mean... Nobody has managed to stop me so far!
 
And when the person wants to keep debating you on that point but all the evidence has been laid out.

"Stop repeating yourself, debate me."

There's nothing else to say!!!

I'll admit I've caught myself doing this because I didn't realize me and the other person had fallen into this trap...
 
Emirp sumitpo said:
It's annoying how when a calc has multiple ends. And when a calc member evaluates it, they say it's fine without saying which end it is.
Click to expand...
the text explaining the calc and all the multiples ends:
block-of-text.jpg


staff input: seems fine
 
BEASTHEART880 said:
Bruh really just making any thread and getting no comments is a pain in the balls. Especially CRTs.
Click to expand...
I always come to staff wall and call them to come to my thread,that's why my CRTs about minor additions are always real fast lol,the moment only one staff said "seems fine" (don't care if they read OP or not) everything is already done on their profiles kek (sometimes I don't even make CRT but still add minor additions because no one care about forgotten verses after all)
 
Delta333 said:
I always come to staff wall and call them to come to my thread,that's why my CRTs about minor additions are always real fast lol,the moment only one staff said "seems fine" (don't care if they read OP or not) everything is already done on their profiles kek (sometimes I don't even make CRT but still add minor additions because no one care about forgotten verses after all)
Click to expand...
Yeah that helps. Sometimes at least
 
Yeah i gonna have to agree on that, is a ledser one but still bugs me, at least give like, a few more words then "no" or " "
 
I'm pretty sure this isn't just a VSBW pet peeve but it's pretty annoying whenever a new user instantly posts a CRT due a suspension of believe of the ratings of popular verses yet most if not all their issues would've been easily solved if they just read the verse page/blogs.

Totally not suspect that some folks know how to post a CRT while linking tags and images to it yet magically forget to read the verse page or just go to the Q&A threads.
 
Metalballrun said:
I hate it when users can't form coherent sentences. Not talking about just minor grammatical errors, that's normal. I mean full on butchering the English language, third grade discord user-speak clusterfuck level of writing.

It makes discussions really difficult for multitudes of reasons.
Click to expand...
Dude this speaks to me on so many levels-
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
  • Locked
Wiki Destabilization Discussion Thread
Replies
7
Views
1K
Sir_Ovens
Sir_Ovens
ThePrimalHunter
FC/OC vs Joke Battles Wiki Matches
Replies
1
Views
3K
H3110l12345I20
H3110l12345I20
Rikimarox2
Lightning is the Only Way General Discussion
Replies
31
Views
1K
Rikimarox2
Rikimarox2
HonestlyBored24
What is the most Powerscaling piece of fiction you’ve ever seen?
3 4 5
Replies
194
Views
20K
Mahek_The_Assassin_Silent_Killer
GarrixianXD
VS Battles Is Nonsense / Delete My Account UwU
2
Replies
48
Views
5K
Epiccheev
Epiccheev
Back
Top