• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Uxie and Arceus: Information Manipulation

Uxie embodies knowledge, not the concept of knowledge as far as I am aware. And general control is a longshot from there.


Either way knowledge Ôëá information.

Information exist wether you know about them or not.
 
For the record, I'm not talking about the ones that are usable for combat. I was talking about the basic level of it.
 
Fair enough (though we did agree on the 6 of Arceus' creations being concepts back when Mighty was an admin). What do you say about the immortality though?
 
The real cal howard said:
(though we did agree on the 6 of Arceus' creations being concepts back when Mighty was an admin).
Wether they embodie concepts or not is beside the point for this discussion.

But there was actually a discussion about that once? If you can still find it mind linking me that? Seems like an interesting read, I always wondered where that came from.


Regarding type 4... I don't think they qualify as gods and in principle don't think their immortality is something simply granted by arceus (as it is more part of their being, then something arceus himself really maintains). So I wouldn't think they qualify.
 
By changing the concept of knowledge Arceus can theoretically do the following things:

- decide who can "know" at all

- decide what can and can't be known (generally and spefically per individual)

- how knowledge is acquired (same) (perceiving, learning, etc.)

- change/take existing knowledge, give knowledge (same) (e.g. giving himself nigh-omniscience, change the knowledge of people and therefore change their brains)

Hope this helps.
 
I wasn't entirely sure of the difference between the two, and when type 2 is applicable in general. So they didn't demonstrate type 2, if you're questioning it.
 
Back
Top