• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Usage of "higher" for character statistics

Status
Not open for further replies.
"Much" is literally a synonym for "far" when referring to quality/quantity. It's fine as is.
 
Yes but our pages should ideally use consistent terms instead of synonyms. They should use "higher" not "greater", "superior", or "larger". They should use "Far higher" not "Much higher".
 
Sera EX said:
"Higher

Should be used to denote a character's weapons, techniques, or attributes that are much stronger than their base level, but still within the same tier. For instance, a character that is Solar System level but has an attack that multiplies their power by 100 times, as in versus matches this can give said character an advantage in attack potency. In this instance it should be writt m as "Solar System level, higher with that ability or technique".

Furthermore, higher may also be used to denote a case where the character is possibly or likely a higher tier, but to what degree is not specified. This is specifically referring to cases such as "At least 4-B, likely higher" or "At least Solar System level, likely higher".
This seems fine to me. Should I unlock the Attack Potency page for you to edit? The instruction text can probably be added in the notes section.
 
Talking about Attack Potency page the "+" symbol is no longer misused so this part should also be addited

(but I don't quiet agree with the current usage of it so I should probably make a revision threat about it as well)
 
The + sign is still recurrently misused. I simply tend to fix the pages that do so when I monitor edits. As such, the explanation should preferably stay as it is.
 
Just a few days back I figured out that the Yakuza calcs actually were a few ten million joules away from being 9-A+ so I corrected it.
 
Okay. Thank you for the help.
 
@Ant

Sorry for the wait, but yes I can add the info to the Attack Potency page when you're ready.
 
Okay. Thank you. I will unlock the page for you. Tell me here when you are done.
 
Okay. Thank you for the help. Should we close this thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top