Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
What are the conclusions here so far?
This has been brought up and it has received mixed thoughts from the staff, but no proper conclusion yet.The “higher” part of the page should be revised to say something like “Furthermore, higher may also be used to denote a case where the character is possibly or likely a higher tier/higher within the same tier, but to what degree is not specified. This is specifically referring to cases such as “At least 4-B, likely higher” or “At least Solar System level, likely higher”.
I agree with that descriptionOkay.
@Damage3245 @Ogbunabali @Celestial_Pegasus @The_Wright_Way @DarkDragonMedeus @DemonGodMitchAubin @AKM sama @Elizhaa @Agnaa @QuasiYuri @ByAsura
What do you think of the suggestion that Bobsican quoted in the preceding post above?
"likely/possibly higher" can only be used when they aren't close enough to a higher tier or for when there's too much ambiguity as to which tier they'd land in. Otherwise they'd just get the tier, like our rules say.It is possible for a character who is depicted as vastly superior to another in a statistic to be placed in a tier above the other, given that the other character is close to the the next tier. However, this ultimately needs to be decided through case-by-case analysis.
What is the issue that makes you disagree with it?I still have to disagree with your logic. It also seems very picky choosy, imo.
He knocked out Thor with one blow using all of his might, basically.
The discussion appears to still be going.Do we need to do anything here, or should we close this thread?