No, it just means Darkrai downscales from their 2-B. Which is what the argument is trying to point out.
Yeah I don't think it'll make it to the profiles, its a top tier Magikarp seemingly due to its training.
Deoxys fought Palkia and mewtwo definitely would destroy the creation trio, if you disagree we can debate in voice chat on discord
Mewtwo wouldn't even destroy Deoxys let alone the Creation Trio. This is like the 8th time in the last day dude. You need to reel it back, a lot.
).
nah bro 2-B ash pikachu timeMaybe I’m a “Pokémon noob” but who’s to say all Darkrai scale to one another?
the Darkrai in the movie is clearly stronger than Tobias’ Darkrai (clearly Tobias didn’t IV/EV train his Pokémon
I understand the need to compile all magikarp into 1 profile, however, each legendary only has a handful of showings, I don’t see why they need to be compiled.
if the wiki has a 2-B Lucario and a mountain level Lucario (or whatever the normal one is), I don’t see why the distinct character “Darkrai” from the movie (because he more or less is his own character compared to other Darkrai) can’t have his own profile/tab.
He did stun Arceus and probably scales to Sceptile who hurt a Darkrai who’s 2-B (idk how to slash but pretend I did)
My problem with this argument is that the latter is hardly even able to be considered a fight in the first place as opposed to what he did against Dialga and Palkia.
I actually do think current pikachu scales above arceus but y'all ain't ready for that
Say sike right now.
What's the anti-feat?
Like two dozen Psychic Pokemon including Pokemon like Metagross needing to combine their powers to stop a galactic bomb, when normally, just the Metagross would have been enough or even a few of the other pokemon that helped. (And yes, it was outright said that it would have failed alone).
Just gonna say this now that I have you on “ignore” so you are pretty much wasting your time trying to address anything to me.
He kinda isnt.
I mean, I do have something to claim otherwise, that our canon standards don't work like that. We don't assume the Naruto anime is canon for following the manga closely, so that in particular isn't an argument for canonicity.
Using other verses isn’t an argument when they don’t work the same as this one.
Using other verses isn't an argument. Using the site standards, on the other hand, is, and you seem to ignore that we don't assume "it follows closely the plot of another part of the franchise" as evidence for canon.
Yes, because that's how this works. Imagine ignoring people completely on the grounds that they simply disagree with your point of view.
For verses with no specific or unique canonicity standards maybe. But not so much for a verse that has the common trend of treating alternate canons as canon to each other and do not sit under that standard the same way.
I disagree. As I said above, “canon” isn’t a 1 to 1 thing that’s exactly the same across the board. A verse can have source material and how it treats their respective series be drastically different from what another verse and their canon does. Not just Pokémon and what it does/doesn’t do, but in general. Canon should be much more of a case by case concept than simply making an umbrella standard to effect everything exactly the same way.
Like, that's fair. But Pokemon still needs to prove certain things are indeed canon to the mainline games. And it isn't as widespread as you're insinuating.
