UES absorption

[Napoleondevious]

the verse has an UES, character A scales to a certain amount of energy, lets say 500 joules
character B scales to 500 joules also (for some reasons, being comparable to him or something), character B then absorbs character's A energy/ues, can we say that character B's final AP is character B itinial AP + A's AP ? since the potency residing within character's B energy is now one with character's A and in addition to its original AP
so, 1000 joules or is that considered calculation stacking

 

[Demon_Lord18]

Yes, you can. It would be logical to think so and you don't need a UES for this, and it's not considered calculation stacking.

 

[Napoleondevious]

Bump

 

[Digital_Franz]

the verse has an UES, character A scales to a certain amount of energy, lets say 500 joules
character B scales to 500 joules also (for some reasons, being comparable to him or something), character B then absorbs character's A energy/ues, can we say that character B's final AP is character B itinial AP + A's AP ? since the potency residing within character's B energy is now one with character's A and in addition to its original AP
so, 1000 joules or is that considered calculation stacking

No, you can't say that. Without UES it's unquantifiable. With UES, before it was treated like this (having 2x energy == being 2x strong), something that is wrong and that I'm changing here. Everything will just depend on the character's feats.