- 25,022
- 27,033
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Still, it lends credeence to Cade being superhumanly durable, since Cade is probably supposed to be more durable than Sam.I don't think Sam should get a profile tbh
I think Dark Spark is canon to the WFC games (Megatron having his FOC body before FOC is a continuity error).Anyways. I forgot to post it here, but I made this aligned explanation blog. It's not completely ready, but I want to know what everyone thinks of my progress. It also has a long ass title which I hate
Also isn’t it canon the Uniend Cluster used to be a single universe before splitting upAnyways. I forgot to post it here, but I made this aligned explanation blog. It's not completely ready, but I want to know what everyone thinks of my progress. It also has a long ass title which I hate
It is meant to fit in between WFC and FOC, there are some references to the past and future events (namely regarding Ark and Trypticon).No. Uniend cluster used to be it's own multi verse before joining with the wider multiverse.
While AVP does consider animation errors, there's nothing saying that ROTDS is even canon to the WFC games
I'm aware of the Cybertron da games. I wanted to cover the main ones
If it's meant to fit in between WFC and FOC, then yes safe to say it's meant to be canon (if plot points from WFC/FOC are referenced). The fact that it was also a main console game further connect them.Just because it was a main console game, does not mean it was meant to be part of the WFC game. There's no statement that it was canon. Also several infections which only appear in foc, happen to appear in the game as well
AVP did not give a designation for ROTDS or claim that it was a different universe than WFC/FOC, no.Didn't AVP outright say that aren't the same canon? Also simply referrencing several plot points doesn't fully mean it's canon. Considering there are already plot elements that are purely exclusive to foc that are in rotds. That and during the between of FOC and WFC, the Autobots were way too busy with getting off the planet. And foc takes place very shortly after WFC. Also, iirc, Ironhide dies in ROTDS
Technically, the comics don't condradict the games, but still, I won't argue about that.I'll check later, but I remember someone here saying that ROTDS or anything in the aligned should be just seperate if it does have a noticeable amount of differences, such as Megatron's body and several insecticons differing from the foc and wfc, please the fact foc implies to take place not long after wfc as the Autobots were too busy trying to leave all make rotds very iffy to WFC and FOC. The comics are straight up their own continuity
The comics are tied in with the prime cartoons and they use designs from that, as well as the game heavily implying grimlock diedTechnically, the comics don't condradict the games, but still, I won't argue about that.
The comics on their own don't condradict the games themselves. What it entails is that the characters eventually looked like their Prime selves and the events of the Prime cartoon happened more or less.The comics are tied in with the prime cartoons and they use designs from that, as well as the game heavily implying grimlock died
While never outright stated, the game implies he died.If it was not concrete that he died, than they just went with Grimlock surviving (I don't remember Grimlock dying in FOC).
I've already said that the comics don't condradict the games, but that I won't argue for them being necessarily canon.I've covered why the comics aren't part of the games. There are just too many loose ends
By that logic, the comic condradicts itself since it takes both the games and the cartoon as canon tho. The comic itself doesn't condradict the games, that's my point. But this discussion is irrelevant anyway.I mean, it does contradict it by trying to bridge the cartoons with the games. It's the same reason why the bumblebee movie comic is not really canon to anything.
That's my point. The comic is only and should only be treated as canon to itself because it tries to connect 2 things that contradict each other, it's like trying to glue together 2 repelling magnets.By that logic, the comic condradicts itself since it takes both the games and the cartoon as canon tho.
even more evidence for 7-C bayverse?That's my point. The comic is only and should only be treated as canon to itself because it tries to connect 2 things that contradict each other, it's like trying to glue together 2 repelling magnets.
Also funny thing, the movie driller should be 7-C via sheer size according to this blog (Driller is roughly 329.184 meters according to the ILM team)
I think it is much more of a sequel to FOC, since it uses the game characters and explicitly contimues their story, and since it HAS to condradict the cartoon in some way for that to work, the cartoon would only be canon if it doesn't condradict the game. But regardless, I am not arguing that it is necessarilt canon.That's my point. The comic is only and should only be treated as canon to itself because it tries to connect 2 things that contradict each other, it's like trying to glue together 2 repelling magnets.
Also funny thing, the movie driller should be 7-C via sheer size according to this blog (Driller is roughly 329.184 meters according to the ILM team)