So were any requirements changed between TD and ND or was only the name changed. Also, will "non-dualities" be assumed to be immune to haxs such as concept transfer? If this happens, it would really be NLF.
Yeah, the idea is to have ND and TD both having the same types.
With all due respect, if you believe that ND does not work differently than TD, despite me and others explaining how it does for several pages, then you really shouldn't be here. Same for your second question, because I literally just mentioned how ND and TD would work in that situation.
I just want one answer. Does ND work like this example? As I understand it, Qawsedf was the last to agree.
I'm not sure. That's a question for Ant I suppose.
I agreed
Agreeing staff - Deagonx, Qawsedf234, Firestorm808, CloverDragon03, Flashlight237, and myself
Irrelevant. First, DT is very busy with all the threads he has to juggle, and second, a bureaucrat opposing a thread makes trying to pass it over their opinion highly inadvisable. We should only disregard DontTalk if he comes out and says directly he's not interested anymore, which he hasn't done.
I know of no such rule.
Only for specific verse CRT. Wiki policy changes have no such ruling.
What, so DT can just shoot this down by doing absolutely nothing?
What exactly would change if DT comes back and still disagrees?
Bureaucrats have veto powers regarding wiki policy changes. So in a sense, yes. It's not "doing nothing" per se, but, yeah you get what I mean.
Discuss it with him. He's a reasonable person, and you have an opportunity to present your case.
No. This is just following proper wiki procedure, and DT is not that haughty.
If a bureaucrat vetoes a revision, it can't pass until they relent regardless of consensus. I would kindly appreciate it if you drop this nonstop complaining about wiki policy.
I would also kindly appreciate it if you stopped incessantly calling for revisions to be closed just because you can't pass them over a veto. The state of this thread is nothing unique - the following threads are also waiting for DT to have spare time, and these are just the ones I could remember off the top of my head:
A lot of them are. It doesn't look that way because most staff threads don't have anyone devoted enough to them to keep pushing them when DT doesn't respond; I'm the only staff member trying to clear out the staff forum backlog, which is coming along really slowly.DT ain't showing up, just give up man
I AM curious why other staff threads that DT disagrees with aren't in permanent limbo like this one though
How exactly do you plan on clearing the backlog when DT is, again, capable of stalling a thread forever by doing nothing? You cant close those threads because DT hasn't given the final word, and you cant apply them since he didn't agree. Seems a little counterintuitive to your goal.
DT's priority right now is Ultima's Marvel Comics revision, which is almost done. He will comment eventually, so we just have to wait.
DT is a bureaucrat with veto rights.
I will remind him again.Well, personally I do not mind this change.
I will remind DontTalk to comment here.
