- 3,346
- 1,912
bump
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Transduality Should be Nonduality
- Thread starter Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
- Start date
-
- Tags
- transduality
- Status
- 168,517
- 77,233
I will remind DontTalk again. 
If he doesn't show up, we can probably proceed with the following change.
vsbattles.com
If he doesn't show up, we can probably proceed with the following change.
Transduality Should be Nonduality
Yeah your draft is fine. If only any other mod would comment So were any requirements changed between TD and ND or was only the name changed. Also, will "non-dualities" be assumed to be immune to haxs such as concept transfer? If this happens, it would really be NLF. For example, giving a...
- 3,346
- 1,912
What is a reasonable time-limit to give him?I will remind DontTalk again.
If he doesn't show up, we can probably proceed with the following change.
Transduality Should be Nonduality
Yeah your draft is fine. If only any other mod would comment So were any requirements changed between TD and ND or was only the name changed. Also, will "non-dualities" be assumed to be immune to haxs such as concept transfer? If this happens, it would really be NLF. For example, giving a...
- 3,346
- 1,912
bump, it's been aaround 10 days
- 3,346
- 1,912
second bump, would this be safe to apply without DT now?
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
It's a wiki wide revision, you barely have enough approval to pass it.
- 3,346
- 1,912
the thread got the required amount of votes a long time ago, which got blocked by dt, who has not posted a counter
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
It's a wiki policy revision, you need larger number of staff than the usual 3
- 3,346
- 1,912
that's already been done. literally the only obstacle was DT, who has not responded since may/june i believe
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
Also you need he can veto such revision.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
- Thread starter
- #492
But he hasn't. I'll ask Ant to unlock the Transduality page so I can make the necessary edits tomorrow.
PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,100
- 6,037
He disagreed, you need to convince him otherwise.
Also he is busy both IRL and here, so you'd still need to wait for him.
- 11,386
- 19,976
Well, it seems that Ant agrees that the changes should be applied if DT did not appear in the weeks or months that this topic was stonewalled.
And more than a week has passed since his final verdict/time limit.
- 5,410
- 6,217
Looks like Ant is fine with the revision going through.
This just seems like unnecessary stonewalling.
I will remind DontTalk again.
If he doesn't show up, we can probably proceed with the following change.
Transduality Should be Nonduality
Yeah your draft is fine. If only any other mod would comment So were any requirements changed between TD and ND or was only the name changed. Also, will "non-dualities" be assumed to be immune to haxs such as concept transfer? If this happens, it would really be NLF. For example, giving a...
This just seems like unnecessary stonewalling.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
- Thread starter
- #496
Ant, it's been well over a week. Is the following draft acceptable to apply now?
Mad Dog of Fujiwara/nonduality
vsbattles.fandom.com
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
In such things you should wait for him, at least try to persuade him
- 9,982
- 10,821
It seems he's not interested tho. If you want him to come here for you, then you should try to contact him or tell him to come. If he's not interested, then there is nothing to wait.In such things you should wait for him, at least try to persuade him
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
You should wait for him because he is a bureaucrat and he was the one who made the latest Transduality standards. So yeah, worst case scenario you should wait. At least even if he doesn't agreed...
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
I would prefer it if we formatted the page more like NEP with a "Nature" section for the distinction between nonduality and transduality, so I wrote a revised version of your draft:Ant, it's been well over a week. Is the following draft acceptable to apply now?
Mad Dog of Fujiwara/nonduality
IdiosyncraticLawyer/Sandbox
vsbattles.fandom.com
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
I have a question. Would it be good to add to the page that non-duality would be affected by things like concept transfer and concept creation and etc?I would prefer it if we formatted the page more like NEP with a "Nature" section for the distinction between nonduality and transduality, so I wrote a revised version of your draft:
IdiosyncraticLawyer/Sandbox
Last edited:
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
Ahh... I didn't see it.
- 3,702
- 2,065
So... the ND and TD just being different in, one is still can be given the duality property and the other is cannot
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
- 3,346
- 1,912
no. Transduality transcends the system while nonduality is outside the system, if that makes sense
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
Transdaulity also transcends dualities and non-dual beings
- 3,346
- 1,912
- 3,702
- 2,065
The two word is just same meaning, what i see even if you use word like transcendence it still not TD. And even if you use the word outside, but it show the proof of what the standard called it TD then it is TD
So the different is just the one is still can be bound by properties of duality and the other is cannot be bound
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
Isn't that the case anyway? So even though you are a non-dual being, you can still be influenced and this is basically an easy thing to do. That's why I disagreed with "non-duality" and argued that "transcendence" must still exist.
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
- Thread starter
- #511
Yall. The thread has been accepted. Shut up.
- 3,346
- 1,912
im pretty sure we need ant to unlock the follow-up thread before closing this one.
- 3,702
- 2,065
Yes, thats why i say the different between ND and TD is, ND still can be bound and TD not or completely unbound
And i just have problem with a word like transcendence that being glorified, even by default it just mean resistence, and have same meaning as word outside. I mean for have TD you must use that world, if not then no
Mad_Dog_of_Fujiwara
She/Her- 9,828
- 12,455
- Thread starter
- #514
Yeah, which is why there isn't any point is debating the topic further.
IdiosyncraticLawyer
Username OnlyVS Battles
Joke Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Translation Helper
- 3,256
- 3,961
I can swap my draft into the page at a moment's notice and am just waiting for Ant's go-ahead.
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
Yes, we are still waiting for Ant and DT, you can cry.
- 3,346
- 1,912
ant already said we can move on without dt if he doesnt respond in a week, its been 2
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
And the result... We are still waiting. This is what a bureaucrat is like, man, especially if you have done transduality standards before, they are waiting for you.
Vietthai96
He/Him- 10,431
- 15,051
Example should be put as separate Section rather than under each aspect like NEP page, no one will know those example belong to nondual and transdualI would prefer it if we formatted the page more like NEP with a "Nature" section for the distinction between nonduality and transduality, so I wrote a revised version of your draft:
IdiosyncraticLawyer/Sandbox
Now that talking about examples, need to find example for both nondual and transdual
Georredannea15
He/Him- 4,726
- 3,123
There aren't many examples of non-dual characters, because they are fully "transdual" beings that transcend duality systems.
- Status
Similar threads
