- 10,117
- 11,489
@Overlord
Chill, mate. Even if you are right, you're making yourself look like an ass by getting heated.
Chill, mate. Even if you are right, you're making yourself look like an ass by getting heated.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Which part in there proves it's not instant?100% not istataneous
Oh I would have, long time ago. Had you just asked for it that is.or you just stop bein an ass and just show YOU DAMN EVIDENCE
They still can die. Regardless of anything. It may not imagine its own death, it definitely can imagine the death of its avatars.The abtraction is what control the bodies, they don't have a separate mind
So you're saying there is no more to desperados than that image?read the image in imaginary
Funny and what did the girl mean by that or what did she do about it? Can you give me an answer to that?"This is just my fantasy !"
the part where she didn't instatly dieWhich part in there proves it's not instant
appeal to emotions fallacyOh I would have, long time ago. Had you just asked for it that is, instead of just saying "no it's not, you're wrong, you wanking".
which doesn't do anything about it, since the abtract self wouldn't even flitch at seeing the death of one of it's avatarsThey still can die. Regardless of anything. It may not imagine its own death, it definitely can imagine the death of its avatars.
considering how in none of the scan i've seen the damage became real, yesSo you're saying there is no more to this than that?
she didn't die, that's for certain, showing the the fate is just more an allucination than anything physicalFunny and what did the girl mean by that or what did she do about it? Can you give me an answer to that?
I feel heavily offended by that statement.Who else?
You.
Dude, this isn't even his word, this is what is on the profiles and has been accepted by CRTs, you're comiting a fallacy by arguing from disbelieve.so your words can't be trusted
Oh can you explain why though?the part where she didn't instatly die
Not really I'm just refusing to do something because of your attitude. If you call this a fallacy it makes me start to wonder if you actually know what a fallacy even is.appeal to emotions fallacy
The abstraction wouldn't, the avatars sure would.which doesn't do anything about it, since the abtract self wouldn't even flitch at seeing the death of one of it's avatars
Oh so since you don't know any more there isn't any more? Do me a favour and re read that fallacy page again and tell me which one this statement you just made falls under.considering how in none of the scan i've seen the damage became real, yes
I mean would "showing" the fate be physical? I never stated that now did I?she didn't die, that's for certain, showing the the fate is just more an allucination than anything physical
what did the girl mean by that or what did she do about it?
She didn't instantly die, so it isn't istantOh can you explain why though?
Not really I'm just refusing to do something because of your attitude. If you call this a fallacy it makes me start to wonder if you actually know what a fallacy even is.
The abstraction wouldn't, the avatars sure would.
None reallyOh so since you don't know any more there isn't any more? Do me a favour and re read that fallacy page again and tell me which one this statement you just made falls under.
if the fate is not physical than it can't killI mean would "showing" the fate be physical? I never stated that now did I?
You still dodged my question though. To quote my question again:
I don't know what I'm talking about regarding the verse so I'd really like to be schooled right now. Can you enlighten me? Cus the scan doesn't seem like it captured the full context, it doesn't show what happened afterwards, so I am confused and probably other ppl are too, can you explain?
Claims this, despite having literally saidi'm not really arguing y diselief
You're literally arguing from disbelieve against something that's on the profiles and has been accepted by CRTs, so please don't act like you aren't.i'm not buying it from just your words no matter what you say
In that scan she didn't die at all though, I'm confused.She didn't instantly die, so it isn't istant
How long does it take?beside, fate leading to death in no way indicates it being immidiate
Being a flesh puppet means fate/ causality doesn't affect you? That's nice.The bodies are basically flesh puppers controlled by the abtract, so no, the avatars can't be affected
Is that so? Check "arguments from ignorance" for me please, see if it says anything about the "I don't know about it so it doesn't exist"None really
You still didn't show me where I said "showing fate" is physical.if the fate is not physical than it can't kill
How does that have any correlation with death existing at all in the first place or its mechanics?is that girl.
1. a direct avatar of a abtract being ?
Idk, you're the one that knows what he's talking about on rakudai.2. even able to hurt the desperado if she eve tried to ?
Being abstract makes a lot of difference in the mechanics of the ability?because that makes a lot of difference
I mean you can do that just fine on your own, I'm just letting you prove your "no" claims here.look, either you give proof or a link to where said proof is, or you may as swell be a charlatan
That has quite literally never been brought up by anyone in earlier matches I've had with it. I would need proof of that.anywayy, all of that doesn't matter, as Touhou gods can act without the need of avatars, soooooooo Shion can just kill them
Lmao.I feel heavily offended by that statement.
I did read it in it's entirety. Can confirm it was stupid.Also, I have ignored it because I really don't ******* care, but I need to address the elephant on the thread wall.
Whatever this argument is about, settle it down or just completely drop it. I'm not even reading the points, and I can feel the hostility.
To be honest, it seems like Shion would stomp via outliving, in the long run.I never said they beat Shion, they incon shion.
I mean, it's not an argument about the fight, it's about me being annoyed at the constant "no it's not" or the best one yet "you don't know what you're talking about" from people that don't even know the name of the MC of that verse.Whatever this argument is about, settle it down or just completely drop it.
Ugh.....i always forget that's a win condition now.To be honest, it seems like Shion would stomp via outliving, in the long run.
Shouldn’t characters from nasuverse be removed from 6-c since they’re now tier 7?
They don't even share a tier, that's just for fun.
Anyone wanna respond to this so we can get Lili vs Eldweiss done?
Doesnt mean lili cant get her profil cleaned up ovoThey don't even share a tier, that's just for fun.
Because this cleanup could also put her ata higher spot now that blazblue got revisedNo i mean why post it here?
I know i did the same for the fight but why are you using my ideas like they're good?
What does bleach have to do with this?nope, just as much as people not being able to resist soul crush from Bleach because of having an energy system that can be equalized with the verse's, Rimuru wouldn't be able to resist the laws because of having "Mystery"
OkNo chance. Low 2-C is filled with tier 1 smurfs.
^^^I heard Blazblue has been upgraded to solid Low 1-C.
They should be removed from 2-A spot and Puella Magi Verse should be moved up to 4th place then.
Did they forget to upgrade him? He's above Raquel and she's just Low 1-C.