• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Top 10 Strongest Characters for Every Tier Continuation

Status
Not open for further replies.
It's just a webnovel unfinished he published on internet and its 85% info dumping powers and or scaling...maybe both. A verse made for battle boarding ... so yeah don't take it seriously I was joking.
 
Subhuti has thought-based 6-D space-time manipulation that he either uses to blend people, BFR them or compress them to death.

That said, his survivability is relatively lower I think so others might have a fighting chance if they have really good passives.
 
he can`t but sikuta can`t harm D either. D has 5D resistances and sikuta doesn`t seem to have Low 1A hax
In this key does not resist Power Absorption, Corrosion Inducement (Which is passive), Immortality Negation or Information Manipulation. Stikua has all four so D gets inconned at the very least and straight up merked otherwise.
 
Do we get to a point where numbers and axioms simply don't cut it to describe the power of a character? Because I feel like with apophatic theology, we're getting to that point again, especially ever since omnipotence got gutted
 
Do we get to a point where numbers and axioms simply don't cut it to describe the power of a character? Because I feel like with apophatic theology, we're getting to that point again, especially ever since omnipotence got gutted
That's what the suggestion is.

Mathematics will be downgraded to High 1-A.

Tier 0 starts at transcending all axioms of size, measurement etc. And ends in Absolute Silence, which is what the Self-Reference Engine is.

Of course, this is assuming the revisions get passed.
 
“If it weren’t for me, you wouldn’t even have the lifeboat and you’d be sinking all the way down to the Not Abyss. Do you know why this place is called the Not, Eugene? Because it’s Not our world, Not our universe, Not our multiverse and Not even our omniverse. We are outside of Reality itself, and the only reason it’s even remotely comprehensible is that this is just the surface of the Not and we can still see our own Reality from here. Now, if you go deep enough down that you can’t see home anymore, then your mind will shatter just from the sheer nature of the Not itself. Those are some truly unfathomable fathoms, let me tell you. Literally indescribable, utterly inconceivable and unimaginable, not a single mote of stuff down there that wouldn’t drive you absolutely bonkers just trying to wrap your head around it.”
Where? If so, it would be cool to use it in their justifications.
Yes
 
“If it weren’t for me, you wouldn’t even have the lifeboat and you’d be sinking all the way down to the Not Abyss. Do you know why this place is called the Not, Eugene? Because it’s Not our world, Not our universe, Not our multiverse and Not even our omniverse. We are outside of Reality itself, and the only reason it’s even remotely comprehensible is that this is just the surface of the Not and we can still see our own Reality from here. Now, if you go deep enough down that you can’t see home anymore, then your mind will shatter just from the sheer nature of the Not itself. Those are some truly unfathomable fathoms, let me tell you. Literally indescribable, utterly inconceivable and unimaginable, not a single mote of stuff down there that wouldn’t drive you absolutely bonkers just trying to wrap your head around it.”

Yes
Even if we were to take this as an example of negative theology, it's still far from Self-Reference Engine. Rip.
 
Don't you need statement of any way to describe the thing that is apophatic is either false or not enough? Statements of being indescribable or going mad trying to describe it aren't enough on its own as far as I am aware
 
Don't you need statement of any way to describe the thing that is apophatic is either false or not enough? Statements of being indescribable or going mad trying to describe it aren't enough on its own as far as I am aware
This is true. Sometime what appears to be apophatic can also just be an example of nonexistent Physiology.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top