- 5,232
- 2,321
I mean you don't even have to do that, just mention it in the PnA or NA&T, cause those are actually meant to explain how the powers work.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
[Toaru] Downgrading Magic Gods' High 1-C Tiering
- Thread starter Churronzon
- Start date
- 2,984
- 2,421
true, this also applies to world rejecter
- 20,606
- 17,607
Yeah, if the powers themselves aren't AP as much as smurf hax, the ratings should be removed from the page and just explained how high they go in the P&A section.
Abstractly_a_Protagonist
He/Him- 1,675
- 1,428
@Qawsedf234 makes sense above.
I also disagree on the OP.
I also disagree on the OP.
- 663
- 551
Maybe try reading the profile first? Scan is provided in the quote below. I'll be logging off with this since it's very late right now.
- 8,184
- 2,618
what does that prove? IB isn't AP and that quote changes absolutely nothing.
FantaRin_The_First
Username Only- 4,094
- 2,502
At most, it proves that Imagine Breaker has durability negation against supernatural bodies... which fits more than a flat-out High 1-C rating, ngl.
- 168,514
- 77,231
@Qawsedf234 @DontTalkDT @Scrlk666777 @Accelerate420 @XDragnoir @Zensum @Rez @Schnee_One @Problemexe
What do you think should be done here?
What do you think should be done here?
- 18,393
- 14,323
I thought the thread is already rejected. The majority are against it and even one admin disapproved it.
- 20,606
- 17,607
The most the thread warrants is removing the High 1-C rating from some powers and just saying how high they go in the tabber
- 663
- 551
Same thoughts as Dread.
- 959
- 320
- Thread starter
- #54
Is that a no to removing the tiering from Accelerator's vector field as well? If so, could I get a reason?
- 1,574
- 457
Been debated to death in the past, it was determined to just leave it at the highest thing he's dealt with.
- 18,393
- 14,323
rip
- 959
- 320
- Thread starter
- #57
Even though that's not how the ability works at all and doesn't determine his limit.
- 2,984
- 2,421
Its hax based tho
Rez
He/Him- 4,830
- 1,967
And it still qualifies for durability technically
- 959
- 320
- Thread starter
- #62
Qualifies in the sense that it can be written as "Vector manipulation makes him difficult to kill"
- 168,514
- 77,231
It seems like quite a lot of changes to our To Aru pages need to be reverted or modified then.
Is somebody knowledgeable here willing and able to handle it please?
- 8,184
- 2,618
No, the H1C downgrade didn't go through to the profiles.
- 18,393
- 14,323
Did they leave a note while changing it? Because it could be vandalism in this case.
- 18,393
- 14,323
@Churronzon are you in charge of these modifications?
- 168,514
- 77,231
I think that @FantaRin_The_First helped out with the recent To Aru statistics revisions.
- 8,184
- 2,618
Yeah, there were two verse wide CRTs being approved recently, but nothing came from this thread (the removal of the H1Cs that got this tier via hax was further discussed in these verse wide CRTs).
FantaRin_The_First
Username Only- 4,094
- 2,502
Bit busy so can't help too much atm, but...
Well, Accelerator's High 1-C rating for his Vector Shield comes from dealing with a High 1-C attack - but well... as stated before, his shield is a literal reality-warping hax (in simplistic terms) that simply intercepted and redirected said High 1-C attack (if my memory serves me right), which safe to say isn't really durability at all.
Imo, we could just leave a note at the bottom of Accelerator's profile that states his highest demonstrated reflection with his vector shield is a High 1-C, or something along those lines?
Well, Accelerator's High 1-C rating for his Vector Shield comes from dealing with a High 1-C attack - but well... as stated before, his shield is a literal reality-warping hax (in simplistic terms) that simply intercepted and redirected said High 1-C attack (if my memory serves me right), which safe to say isn't really durability at all.
Imo, we could just leave a note at the bottom of Accelerator's profile that states his highest demonstrated reflection with his vector shield is a High 1-C, or something along those lines?
FantaRin_The_First
Username Only- 4,094
- 2,502
Adding on this, my CRTs were focused on the non-god tier (and technically high-tier as well, due to not having any new calcs for them... for now) folks and has been approved and is slowly being applied (this is mostly due to my college workload among other things). Nothing in this specific thread has been applied, but I did link this CRT cuz it contains a topic that I am interested (removal of Accelerator's High 1-C rating, which I didn't attempt include in my own CRT(s) due to me thinking it would be rude to do so since another CRT was doing it) and hoped to draw attention to it.
- 20,606
- 17,607
Anyways, like with our Fate or D&D profiles, as long as the potency is explained somewhere I think it would be fine to remove the AP rating.
- 168,514
- 77,231
Okay. No problem then.
Thank you for helping out.
Have any other staff members commented here, and if so, what do they think?
- 63,529
- 8,507
I know borderline nothing about To Aru Gods, I have no place here.
FantaRin_The_First
Username Only- 4,094
- 2,502
Eh, at this point, the God Tiers are safe from downgrade - Now, it is just the topic if Accelerator should lose his High 1-C rating, who only has it cuz of this -
Which kinda doesn't work for durability, and considering how Accel's ability is a hax ability, I am of the opinion that the high 1-C Rating should be removed from Accelerator's Durability, be replaced with Vector Manipulation makes it hard for Accelerator to be harmed in his dura section (or smth along those lines), and mention in a note at the bottom of Accel's profile that High 1-C is the highest thing his vector shield has dealt with.
Last edited:
Rez
He/Him- 4,830
- 1,967
As long as the potency of the ability is properly explained on the profile somewhere, i think it's fine to remove the high 1-C rating from the durability section.
- 2,984
- 2,421
That's because they are outdated lol
- 2,984
- 2,421
I agree with removing his high 1-c rating
Similar threads
