PrinceofPein
Username Only- 9,053
- 5,983
- Thread starter
- #201
The whole notion of infinite 4D is weird at this point, a single timeline is infinite 4-D on its own but I have seen others refer to it like it is notIt wouldn't be infinite 4D?
Yes I have seen it, and I thought I mentioned it already, they would be the exception and not the rule, if destruction of the past branches does not affect the future then they should certainly be treated as disjointed timelines@Pain_to12 I asked him about how we should treat branching timelines given they still extend infinitely across even if you nuke the branch it stems from with my comment here. He responded by saying if you nuked the branch and the Timelines that branches off still exist you’d essentially have parallel timelines by default. So technically speaking you’d still get higher than Low 2-C by default unless there’s any counter point to this, which I don’t recall seeing in this thread by you or KingPin.