• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The Profile Thread

Very interesting! Would it be okay to review an entire verse? If yes, mind if you review all of the pages of this verse?
 
Psychomaster35 said:
Very interesting! Would it be okay to review an entire verse? If yes, mind if you review all of the pages of this verse?
If you're looking for overall issues, I guess I could.
 
Psychomaster35 said:
Very interesting! Would it be okay to review an entire verse? If yes, mind if you review all of the pages of this verse?
All the pages look fine in general. I have a few minor suggestions though.

  • Try to keep the summary concise. Mostly stylistic, but a long summary can be unncessary. Just make sure to give just enough information to explain who they are and their relation to others in their verse. This is really more personal preference than anything though, so long as it's neat.
  • Maybe add a gallery for characters? Unless there aren't enough images I guess, it never hurts.
  • Tabbers might be better if they gain alot of powers or lose some, though in this case its more optional.
Otherwise is good
 
I wish I had pictures for the Huniebee but it's never shown without looking at the screen.

Maybe I could just show a picture of the screen when you're looking at the Huniebee? Or would that be too whack?
 
That could work. Just put it in as a image (or multiple images) if you need that.

(Technically that Hunibee explanation should be in standard equipment rather than attacks and techniques but it's not the end of the world)
 
Chariot190 said:
Main issue is the tiering wording. Think there may be a extra space in the comma "possibly 9-A", and it should be "possibly Small Building level", not "possibly at least"

Also in general you want to have a character's own name mentioned and bolded in their summary
 
I don't think there is but if so I'll check and fix it if need be.

The issue is it is possibly at least small building, it depends on how much 20% of volpes strength is, could be small building or could be inching into baseline building. Given that we don't it's hard to say just that it's likely at least small building if color needed 20% rather then that's all he used.

If you have an opinion on better way to get that across I'm all ears.
 
That's fine, but you should have that in the tier part then, not just the attack potency part and the like. The wording should be consistent.
 
Oh? You mean I should put at least in the tier part? I seen profiles that don't list terms like "at least" in the tiering thus I thought it was something we don't do.
 
Yobo Blue said:
Oh, is 9-B for voodoo child or for her normal physicals?
Voodoo Child is 9-B, possibly at least small building.

She's only athletic in ap (maybe higher but it's baseline, feats need to be called first).
 
I was going to make the stand a key but all the canon profiles don't have the stands as a key so I didn't. Even though I think it'd be helpful.
 
I think I may have to give a example. Let me see if I can show you what I mean
 
Yeah I get you. I'll edit those in along with a vector later tonight.

Do you think voodoo child should be a key though? To avoid confusion with Sheila?
 
Obviously different things work for different verses, especially depending on how many powers each profile has. A good example of a longer one is Gilgamesh (Fate Series). In fact...


Should Gilgamesh be considered a excellent profile example?

Yes
5

No
2


The poll was created at 03:05 on October 11, 2019, and so far 7 people voted.
Please wait, submitting your vote...
 
I actually had go look those over for various reasons before hand. Pretty solid. This is more a optional thing, but it may be better to include images of techniques or equipment. Personal preference though, like galleries (which are also good to add)
 
The series is a novel, so every single pic avalible of them is already on their profiles (bar a single off-model pic of Fugil that makes him look exactly like a White-Haired Itachi).
 
Yobo Blue said:
Obviously different things work for different verses, especially depending on how many powers each profile has. A good example of a longer one is Gilgamesh (Fate Series). In fact...
I'm personally going through all the JoJo profiles and adding a gallery with gifs that I created showcasing powers and abilities, because it looks nice and can do wonders to avoid any confusion if the thing in question is visibly shown. I think all profiles that have a visual medium should have that, after JoJo I may make galleries for some nintendo profiles, the fact Gil does that to an extent is the defining factor in ok to good in my honest opinion.
 
Drite77 said:
How bad this profile is?
Uh, not the best. Not delete worthy or anything. Summary could use some fleshing out. Main issue is that there's not much and the wording sounds weird
 
Back
Top