Deleted member 16409
Guest
So UT is already tier 1, higher than everOh yeah...I forgotten about that
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
So UT is already tier 1, higher than everOh yeah...I forgotten about that
It wasn't. The evidence for 2-B is still debunked.That was the general consensus innit?
Asriel and Chara both scale to it, Reth and me proved this enough.Shame no one really scales to it-
Wait, what?Asriel and Chara both scale to it, Reth and me proved this enough.
Noppers.Anyways in all seriousness, I'm always down for 2-B Undertale. In fact, there is actually a blog that gives us an actual number how many timelines the Undertale verse could have: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:StrymULTRA/Undertale_verse_cosmology
I have proven that when Chara said "world", they meant the entirety of Undertale, not just a timeline. This comes from the fact that the term "world" is something that encompasses all different paths Frisk can take, Chara states as much on the second Genocide.Wait, what?
Bad tho, they forgetting about 6 children and the fact that Flowey killed every underground man (13000+), so it would calculate to much higher degree + Flowery did something that ingame impossible, for example +300 ways to make Asgore give SOULs.Anyways in all seriousness, I'm always down for 2-B Undertale. In fact, there is actually a blog that gives us an actual number how many timelines the Undertale verse could have:
Wait, are you talking about Chara and Asriel scaling to the 2-B or the Low 1-C stuff? Cause my comment was about the Low 1-C stuff.I have proven that when Chara said "world", they meant the entirety of Undertale, not just a timeline. This comes from the fact that the term "world" is something that encompasses all different paths Frisk can take, Chara states as much on the second Genocide.
With Asriel, it comes from the fact that Flowey used the term "world" as something greater than timeline, and then proceeded to declare he was destroy the world during his battle.
Since we don't really know how many times the 6 humans resetted, they're not really that usable. Like the most we can assume is that they've resetted at least once, so we can just add 6 to the total. And they did actually go over Flowey. Like, it's the first thing they went over.Bad tho, they forgetting about 6 children and the fact that Flowey killed every underground man (13000+), so it would calculate to much higher degree + Flowery did something that ingame impossible, for example +300 ways to make Asgore give SOULs.
It scales only to player tho...Wait, are you talking about Chara and Asriel scaling to the 2-B or the Low 1-C stuff? Cause my comment was about the Low 1-C stuff.
So, it all AT VERY least 100000?Since we don't really know how many times the 6 humans resetted, they're not really that usable. Like the most we can assume is that they've resetted at least once, so we can just add 6 to the total. And they did actually go over Flowey. Like, it's the first thing they went over.
That comment was towards Godly, as I feared they possibly misunderstood what my original comment was talking about.It scales only to player tho...
Yes. Well, if this thread gets accepted that is.So, it all AT VERY least 100000?
I would assume the logic is thatAmount of resets isn't equivalent to number of timelines existing, if so, how does one even prove or suggest the amount of timelines is above 1000
But as I said, number of resets =/= different timelines.I would assume the logic is that
All of flowey's resets + FUN Values + The 6 human souls resets = over 1000
we cant actually get an exact number. but the fact that flowey did every possible thing with the world would assume he did things even frisk didn't do, which would likely get the number of resets he did near 1000
a timeline where he subscribed and didn't subscribe to srpelo.There is a timeline 88 where Flowey burned every book, and there is a timeline 88 where Flowey read every book. (As an example, we don't know if his FUN value repeated at that time, but given the number of resets, it might've happened once)
The true vile action of not being subscribed to Sr. Pelo.a timeline where he subscribed and didn't subscribe to srpelo.
Theres thousands of monsters in the underground and flowey implied hes interacted with everyone in every possible way. And on asgore he might have reloaded hundreds of times there alone.Amount of resets isn't equivalent to number of timelines existing, if so, how does one even prove or suggest the amount of timelines is above 1000
It doesn'tTheres thousands of monsters in the underground and flowey implied hes interacted with everyone in every possible way. And on asgore he might have reloaded hundreds of times there alone.
"We don't even need to leave to get them this time. The king has six of them locked away. I've tried hundreds of ways to get him to show me them... But he just won't."
If number of resets equates to it or that helps anyway
I don't like that interpretation because it doesn't adequately explain how resets work, especially true resets, if you end up in a given timeline twice in a row. In fact, I don't know if we even should consider Fun values at all - or if we do, how their existence points to multiple timelines coexisting as opposed to, say, a single timeline that happens to be partially random. I don't mean to contest the upgrade as a whole since Sans and Alphys' statements are good enough evidence in favor of a multiverse IMO, but I do believe that Fun values are shaky evidence at best.Right so were basically stuck on what to do with the cosmology even with multiple timelines being good. And i take that char is basically saying that while fun values are timelines, frisk could totally go through timeline 88, reset, then replay timeline 88 or one of the other 100 again and sans statement of multiple timelines would still add up to that.
Ive got no opinion on that atm but, what does everyone think on treating the cosmology like that?
Condense your points, christ.I don't like that interpretation because it doesn't adequately explain how resets work, especially true resets, if you end up in a given timeline twice in a row. In fact, I don't know if we even should consider Fun values at all - or if we do, how their existence points to multiple timelines coexisting as opposed to, say, a single timeline that happens to be partially random. I don't mean to contest the upgrade as a whole since Sans and Alphys' statements are good enough evidence in favor of a multiverse IMO, but I do believe that Fun values are shaky evidence at best.
And lastly, since you previously brought up the difference between a reset and a true reset in how it affects things, I'm gonna play devil's advocate and argue the true reset to just be a reset that doesn't stop at the point in time where Frisk falls into the underground, but affects the entirety of the timeline, hence why it can change things that happen before Frisk falls down while a regular reset cannot, and also being reasonably consistent with Flowey's claim that we would erase everything we worked for if we go through with it. Read back to the points I raised in my first two posts on this thread, and then also consider the following:
- The act of resetting, in its normal usage, literally means "to set again or anew." In this case, it'd be referring to how the player can go back to the beginning of the game and take a different path.
- While we don't explicitly know whether or not the surface is affected by the use of save file-related powers in the underground, the fact that you can only change Chara's name after a true reset, which in turn you can only do when the barrier separating the underground from the surface is destroyed, is quite telling.
- Also of note, the only other person who threatens the world with a true reset is Asriel, who we know is powerful enough to destroy the barrier. Meanwhile, when we look at Flowey's save file prior to fighting him, the options listed suggest that he would only be capable of doing a regular reset. I can grab a scan of this if you'd like.
1. I was a massive Undertale fan back in the 2015-2017 period.Eseseso, why are you here man?...
You're not contributing, and u're very notorious for being... uhm, a nuisance. You literally just asked something answered right above you. You make thread thrice as long as they need to me.1. I was a massive Undertale fan back in the 2015-2017 period.
2. Related to the above, I remembered the days of 2-B to 2-A Undertale and was curious.
3. I kinda need a break from OP CRT's.
4. 2-B stuff for franchises I know always interests me (and I'm still waiting for 2-B Kirby).
5. Why not?
So what, you're saying I'm not allowed to comment on any crt anymore?You're not contributing, and you're very notorious for being... uhm, a nuisance. You literally just asked something answered right above you. You make thread thrice as long as they need to me.
2-B kirby? how?1. I was a massive Undertale fan back in the 2015-2017 period.
2. Related to the above, I remembered the days of 2-B to 2-A Undertale and was curious.
3. I kinda need a break from OP CRT's.
4. 2-B stuff for franchises I know always interests me (and I'm still waiting for 2-B Kirby).
5. Why not?
Do not derail.2-B kirby? how?
People have posted your blog before.Alright, if 2-B gets accepted over 2-C (with the latter being the absolute minimum anyway), allow me to introduce two ideas on how the size of said 2-B cosmology would be:
- A: Frisk alone can go at very absolute least 115 Resets (93 endings + 12 tries against Sans + 10 tries against Asgore). Flowey obviously did much more than that, as in hundreds of resets he couldn't make Asgore show him the SOULs, and he could explore every possibility of the underground, meaning that said 2-B, as a very conservative end, should be at very absolute least in the thousands range, as is the safest assumptions for the total amounts of resets done from the characters, and doesn't go in faulty calcs with tons of assumptions.
- B: This is gonna be really controversial, but hear me out. We know that Flowey was about to Reset over Frisk's death over and over infinitely, and was actually doing so if Frisk doesn't use the SOULs to stop him, as Flowey won't get tired of so even if Frisk dies against him on purpose. As a supportive evidence, Flowey has also claimed that he would kill them even millions of times, and with his insane personality is not even that far from the truth, considering he resetted, as the minimum said, thousands of times, with Frisk/Chara being the only one who can truly entertain him, given that they're unpredictable. This actually means that the Undertale World as a game doesn't really have a cap amount the amount of timelines you can produce, and this means that the Game World is big enough to contain whatever finite amount of timeline produced from said resets. Given that the God Tiers such as Chara can indeed affect the entire game world and its files, they don't scale to just the amount of timelines in the game world, but to the game world itself, including the fact that Chara can indeed "destroy the world", and Toby reffering to that Q&A to Undertale and Deltarune as games as "worlds". My suggestion is that the God Tiers would scale from an Ad-Infinitum amount of timelines, as the game world is physically that big, given that it can contain whatever amount of timelines generated even if you make resets over and over infinitely with it not overloading. As Chara/Asriel can always destroy the game world, no matter how big it gets, given that, again, they scale to the game world itself and not just the amount of timelines.
I legit don't care if B get rejected, or both B and A in favor of just 2-C with 100 timelines, but I just wanted to express an opinion.
People have posted your blog before.
My point is that there's still not a real cap to how many Resets can be done, as Loads and Saves are still linked to the same Determination power.Flowey wasn't resetting, he was just loading over Frisk's death. LOAD'ing isn't a reset.
I said if 2-B is getting added, it should be one of those, as they're the ones without relying on random calcs on how many times Flowey has reset.There seems to be no hard proof that the simple act of resetting the timeline and moving to a new one is evidence of number of timelines. 2-C is safer atm.
I agree.There seems to be no hard proof that the simple act of resetting the timeline and moving to a new one is evidence of number of timelines. 2-C is safer atm.
I'm sorry, but the evidence for 2-B is actually not solid, it's not a matter of opinion. A hard rating for it would be impossible due to logic, votes cannot overwrite counterarguments that leave a huge room for doubt in your point.probably gonna split the agree votes, considering we have agreed on multiple timelines but aren't really agreeing on if there are timelines that could grant a 2-B rating.
Agree with 2-B: transcending, Darkdragonmedeus, originlima, saikou, chariot (although seems to prefer a '2-C, likely 2-B' rating), wagy (6)
Agree with 2-C: Charmander, Esseso
Neutral: Infiniteday (although leaning towards agree with 2-B, it seems)
Disagree: Eficiente, Moritza (Likely dosent disagree anymore, although gonna keep her on the disagree list until im completely sure)
I could settle with a '2-C, likely 2-B' if it comes down to it. But I suppose we will see.
Count how many staff support each optionprobably gonna split the agree votes, considering we have agreed on multiple timelines but aren't really agreeing on if there are timelines that could grant a 2-B rating.
Agree with 2-B: transcending, Darkdragonmedeus, originlima, saikou, chariot (although seems to prefer a '2-C, likely 2-B' rating), wagy (6)
Agree with 2-C: Charmander, Esseso
Neutral: Infiniteday (although leaning towards agree with 2-B, it seems)
Disagree: Eficiente, Moritza (Likely dosent disagree anymore, although gonna keep her on the disagree list until im completely sure)
I could settle with a '2-C, likely 2-B' if it comes down to it. But I suppose we will see.