- 16,179
- 13,873
Because that's unironically what happens?I just think now there's just some logical problems in assuming that TE means events are unreal, as well as a lack of convincing case for that claim. There's just multiple equally valid ways to interpret all the evidence that don't lead to these problems, so why would I accept that premise?
Like maybe if you start making up shit yeah, you can explain anything that way by making up whole new rules and additions.
You're arguing because one thing is the case, something else isn't true. Because someone had read a book, or because they dont remember a thing, it must be because it happened, without taking into account WHY they don't.I have no clue how you think this is analogous, but this is irrelevant to the claim that claims about another ability are unjustified.
What? The hell do you think "erasing" time means? That window of time is just gone my dude.Could you actually show that? So far it seems like best you can do is its accepted to erase, but it never actually states that events are considered to not exist.
And it actually does, the cause is gone, leaving only the effect. Which is said, many, many, times.
I did though?Erasure can have many interpretations, and you haven't shown anything that would prove this specific one is accepted.
And no, it can't what the **** are you on? It deletes time, time is gone, nothing that happens within that timeframe remains. We are told this effects time itself, we are told that time vanishes from the world. We are told so many clear-cut statements that the fact you think this is open for interpretation is about on par as thinking The World stopping time is, except King Crimson actually has MORE statements and feats.
Stop trying to extrapolate a bunch of wacky shit and made up "interpretations" for an ability that they can't go five seconds without shoving down your throat to the point the manga gets kinda annoying with it, like yeah we get it.
Because the manga LITERALLY says as much?Uh no? What reason could you give me to believe that skipping isn't an accurate way to describe it if it's stated to be a simple way to put it? I have no reason to believe it's hyperbolic (Which i never actually claimed "Erasure" was to be clear). Erasure can just be used as synonymous with skipping in this context, you'd need to give a reason to believe otherwise especially when it's contextualized by being a skip.
In the stats which YOU had made note of, it says
"Simply put, this Stand can skip through Time. More precisely, it erases a dozen-odd seconds of time. During which only it can act. When time is erased no humans or life in this world will experience this period, of course, they will retain no memory of it either."
The kanji itself even more explicit, using kanji like "
*簡単
1. simple; easy; uncomplicated
2. brief; quick; light
and
*正確
1. accurate; correct; precise; exact
When describing terms, the "it skips time" is just a quick, easy to grasp way to think about it, but it isn't correct. What he actually does is delete time.
This alone, straight from the manga, straight from an informed source, tells us "yeah it isnt ACTUALLY skipping time, what he's actually doing is deleting time", and when time is gone, nothing will experience it, because it says that too, and then Diavolo doubles down on it.
You're taking the end bit of the bio of going "well it lists off an action so...", like yeah no shit it does? It's giving an effective example, of course birds appear to teleport, the time in which they flew was deleted so they went from Point A to B spontaneously. Of course a dude wouldn't remember how far into a book they read, the part they read was deleted so he's suddenly ahead yet.
Erasure most definitely ISN'T synonymous, it's an easy-to-understand misnomer, it might not be correct, but it gets the point across. We're told explicitly that time no longer exists, I sent a scan above saying time vanishes from the world.
Jesus Christ we have Diavolo straight up saying "The entire world within that interval is erased" / "I deleted the entire process". Your interpretation is objectively wrong here.
This scan here, just this one. Tears apart any semblance of any argument you might have. He's literally saying the whole word is gone, the process (cause and actions) are gone, and only the result after the fact remains, all while a spooky ability can't even interact with him as he says it, because of course it can't, everything and the process is gone, which is WHY he's saying it btw. And hell, we have WoG flat-out saying time vanished in that exact panel as mentioned above, like the scan I posted? It's talking about this panel when it says time is gone from the world and actions hold no meaning, because as we know from the scan it's referencing, the process of said actions and world is gone, yeah no shit actions hold zero meaning.
Because fate? And because they didn't? What the **** my dude, they didn't LITERALLY read a book, that isn't what it's saying, it's just saying "Wow a dude was reading a book, bro on page 10, Diavolo skips time and after time resumes, bro is on Page 11, and the dude is confused and doesnt remember having read up to page 11".This also doesn't address my argument that the examples given in the Vell shit are just blatantly inconsistent with the events not happening. How can you read a book and then not read a book (Due to the events not being real) within the time erase at the same time. That's blatantly contradictory.
That is what it's saying, it should be obvious even, how are you getting "oh well he DID read that book, it actually happened", how can it happen when the process is gone, the world and he is gone, and all that's left is forecasted images and no time at all? You're misunderstanding what it's trying to convey bro...
Huh? That's from the manga? The only vel scan posted was that one scan saying time vanishes from the world and actions are meaningless.I'm under the impression that all the stand stat shi come from vel, but this isn't really relevant so whatev.
And that was from ME. The manga started doing stand stats as of Part 5, continued in 6, and in 7 in it swapped for infographics. Part 3 and 4 don't have stats tho, though they all come from guides, except Stands like Plat and Chariot who show up again.
You couldn't prove it's saying "It deletes it to the point the events aren't real." Simply saying, it 'erases it" is not proof enough given the inherent vagueness of the usage, and the fact that Erasure in context is supposed to be boiled down to skipping.
Diavolo LITERALLY says he deletes time, the process, cause, and the entire world, We have INNUMERABLE statements saying time is quite literally affected, time does not exist, and time is gone from the world.
And the **** do you mean "the usage is vague", bro drops a whole-ass exposition twice to clarify what he means when he says time goes buh-bye.
TProof? Wyatt gave you some solid-ass proof in the form of explicit statements, It's like the ONLY thing he does, you've been given proof, no offense but kinda comes off as doing mental gymnastics to twist what it means to not mean it.
What? "He skips time, but ACTUALLY he deletes times lmao". If there was no distinction, they wouldn't actually clarify and say "hey, to actually be correct".There's no distinction here. I get that it's easier phraseology to use, but there's no meaningful distinction between saying the events aren't real and saying they didn't happen. Imma keep using my phraseology.
Ok, well, they don't happen. And it's accepted, it's why got causality manip, the process of things ceases, and only the results of what would have occurred happen because of fucky jojo fate stuff and guaranteed futures and whatever.
No way that's your argument...Because if they didn't happen, then the person in the example given by the stand stats both reads the book (Stated to databook) and didn't read the book (There are no real events within erased time apparently, which means there is no reading) at the same time. There is a contradiction entailed by your interpretation that you haven't addressed.
The RESULTS remain for everyone but Diavolo (He says this like, 8 times in the manga alone).
The actual act of reading the book didn't happen, but the result from them reading it did.
He says so many goddamn times he deletes the cause but keeps the effect. And because of Epitaph and fate as a whole, anything that is fated to happen will arrive at the conclusion as it should be?
All except him anyway, which he uses to avoid bad shit happening to himself, but not others. It's the whole purpose of his Stand and why he calls people sleeping slaves of fate, and how he's at the apex of fate and how he avoids all the pitfalls of fate and this and that, it's his whole character, and also why he was beaten by never being able to get the result, he was so fixated on avoiding shit, deleting whatever he didn't like, and only giving a **** about the results, his fate was to never reach the result of death and be forced to experience the process of dying for eternity
In fact, it's the EXACT same shit as Aerosmith, Aerosmith WOULD have shot Diavolo, but Diavolo deleted a fraction of time, explicitly noted the whole world is gone and the process was deleted but the results of what should have happened remain. It's WHY he has causality manip.
And it isn't my interpretation, we're told all this, what's there to interpret? This is all stated explicitly.
Uh easy, because they don't happen, and we're told they don't happen, and we're shown they don't happen, and we're told the things he's seeing isn't them actually doing stuff but just forecasted images of what WOULD HAVE happened had he not deleted time, and that everything within time skip doesn't happen, just the results remain? Ergo if he isn't actually seeing them do actions but jus images of what they would have done, the world is gone, and the process is gone, by proxy what they did is gone because that's literally what those words entail?How does this offer a defeater to the idea that actions are real within a time erase?
Ignoring the fact we're told again, like 5 times. Yeah, it is a world without timeEven if i granted you time is literally just not there, i'd need another reason to think this applies to actions not being real, there are multiple ways you could take this without actions being unreal. It could just be a literal world without time, but actions are still there. You have no reason to accept one over the other.
But precisely because of that, any actions taken within that time have no meaning, it's like a film reel.
Plop a video in a film editor, cut a chunk of the video out. The part of the video now didn't happen, yeah, things align after the fact that make it seem like it happened, but it didn't, that chunk is gone now and doesn't exist, but within that empty timeframe that should have happened, Diavolo can do shit, like not much, because ya know, but he can change his fate basically by moving around and avoiding what would have happened to him.
WHATYou'd need to prove that and I have no reason to accept that. It doesn't follow from the fact that PA to PB have no meaning means they didn't actually happen.
It can just mean they didn't hurt Diavolo or sum. This isn't an actual proof.
Why do you think they can't hurt him? They aren't even HAPPENING. It's all images, WHOLE WORLD is gone.
My dude, he LITERALLY stands in the path of a Stand attack, and it just goes right through him, and he says "yeah i deleted that the whole goddamn world and the process so get ****** kiddo". Say sike ong right now plz
There isn't a meaningful distinction, it's meaningless BECAUSE they don't happen. Yeah, there WAS an attack, and it COULD have been successful, but because he DELETED TIME, and THE PROCESS THAT OCCURS, attacks become meaningless, and the scan I posted uses an example where he explicitly denotes that context himself while he doubles down on that.No? The fact theres a meaningful distinction between meaningful and meaningless entails it's real, as it simply means there is an attack that could or could not have been successful. The fact that there's such a criterion entails the attack exists.
A nonexistent attack can't fail or not fail to do something, they don't exist.
You're doing actual mental gymnastics my dude... It's meaningless the process of the action doesn't actually happen when time is gone. There's no "well actually they do happen", if they happened it wouldn't be meaningless, hell bro would be straight ******, Abbacchio never would have died, tbh Bruno probably wuld have lived too, he was extremely close to splitting his head open.
Ok.You could point to nowhere in the profile that says what DIavolo sees are actually unreal holograms or whatever.
" During this period, Diavolo can see all actions (human or otherwise) that would have taken place from its activation to the end superimposed onto the world around him."
Explicitly noted it's actions that would have happened, as in, they didn't happen.
And that it's superimposed onto the world around him.
You could not prove any of that. You couldn't prove that he doesn't actually see Bruno there, he never says that, what he says is that he can forecast the trails of Bruno's movement, which literally doesn't prove he isn't seeing Bruno.
es of the erased attacks means they are real.
Newsflash, I wasn't the person who said that,
WHATYou have no justification for claiming the reason he phases through things or the reason people do not remember is because of the fact the attacks simply didn't happen, and there are far too many unaddressed problems with that to actually accept rn.
HE SAYS THAT HIMSELF, AS AN ATTACK IS PHASING THROUGH HIM, THAT BECAUSE HE DELETED TIME, THE WHOLE WORLD IS GONE, AND BECAUSE THE PROCESS IS GONE, HE WON'T GET HIT
WHAT
Are you for real right now?
THEY DON'T REMEMBER BECAUSE IT WAS DELETED, THEY CANT REMEMBER SOMETHING DIDNT HAPPEN, THAT'S THE WHOLE POINTThe fact that they don't remember the attacks means there were attacks in erased time, as that's just what it means to say you don't remember something.
We have like THREE Stands that don't actually exist my dude...Nonexsistent things can't have properties like being meaningless or being forgotten,
Or maybe, it's saying "wow attacks that wouldve happened in that time are bad and stinky now, because like, attacks WOULD have happened, but like, not anymore lmao". Why are you jumping through hoops to bullshit that they exist when we're told shit just doesn't happen?Nonexsistent things can't have properties like being meaningless or being forgotten, you can't attach properties to nothingness, as that would make it not nothing by definition. The fact the databooks can even predicate on the properties of the erased attacks means they are real.
And how much do you wanna bet the properties between these two are so utterly distinct that even trying to compare them is ridiculous?Bend time works in the void which is timeless
Also, unless you think the passage of events that Diavolo happens without time, how can Time Erase be literally timeless?
Diavolo is explicitly the only mf who retains "time". It is timeless, it's said so many times it's obnoxious, it's shown so many times.
And actually yeah, Diavolo CAN'T do anything in time skip, it's unironically why he just doesn't kill people, bro can't rip a dude's head off because of this, but damn if he didn't wish he could.
Regardless.
We are told verbatim. Time does not exist, it's gone, time doesn't exist in the world, ignoring the fact you can tell it's being literal given we see the whole world fall apar and become nothing but a black void, we are told explicitly time and again "hey, time has vanished from the world/time has been deleted/time is gone/etc".
We are told, numerous times the cause is gone, but the result remains, which is why you have things like "cant remeber reading a book" are a thing, because the act of reading is gone, but the result having done so stays. Hence the causality manip that he has on his profile right now.
We are told the whole world is just flat out ******* gone (which we see), hence the spatial manip he has accepted on his profile.
We are told like ten times that "the actions" are just images, aka, not the person actually doing them.
The only person here who's not actually following how it works is you, and ignoring everything that tells us how it works and what it does, most of which have zero-room for interpretation.