• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

The commoners thread: Discussing Ultima's "On the Many, Many Incoherences of the Tiering System"

Status
Not open for further replies.
Divine Simplicity is the easiest explanation. That the divine is not of properties nor of any conformant of compositions about its physical or metaphysical nature.

Monad as Ultima describes it is the single origin point, an ineffable point beyond anything as the one and only true substance like the idea of Brahman in Hinduism.
would divine simplicity have a page on the wiki explaining it?
 
man, this shit confuses me. Won't stop me from trying to get alien x to boundless /j
Most likely impossible because there can be only one boundless being in cosmos {if they remove this disqualification , then statment for limitless power of Alien X can be used as it's 15 % and 100% both are equally limitless}


But best of luck for trying
 
No character in Ben 10 qualifies for tier 0
 
Doesn’t the existence of other celestial - sapiens automatically prevent Alien X from ever reaching Tier 0 if Monad is accepted as the determining factor?
 
I’d win
Screenshot_2023_1126_202221.png
 
This isn't wanked
This is just a piece of shit 🤦
 
Again, if you're saying that "possible worlds" is according to one set of axioms, it is plausible for a series to invoke a collection of "possible worlds" which explicitly extend over all axioms (i.e. having different such sets for different axioms), which would be broader than High 1-A+/0 under your system, causing an issue.

That sort of thing seems pretty coherent to me, so whichever weird way you decide to treat it (either ignoring such statements completely, putting them as equal to monads despite explicitly being above them, or taking a far lower interpretation of Low 1-A or something) is something I'd see as a flaw in the system.
Wouldn't that just be special kind of Type 4 Multiverse which should be High 1-A/or Tier 0? Unless R>F or monad is established in the series wouldn't it be far fetched to assume it to be High 1-A? Just wondering.
 
It seems he still has the majority though.
I know. He was asking a hypothetical, and I was answering it.
Wouldn't that just be special kind of Type 4 Multiverse which should be High 1-A/or Tier 0? Unless R>F or monad is established in the series wouldn't it be far fetched to assume it to be High 1-A? Just wondering.
If a cosmology greater than that which a monad can create is tiered lower than or equal to a monad, that's a contradiction.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top