KingNanaya
He/Him- 3,017
- 4,201
NiceDo note that BDE Type 2 alone now would only reach Low 1-A.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NiceDo note that BDE Type 2 alone now would only reach Low 1-A.
its fine the original one is beyond distinction of concepts of space and time in his verseDo note that BDE Type 2 alone now would only reach Low 1-A.
yeSo, does now R>F automatically gets BDE2?
its fine the original one is beyond distinction of concepts of space and time in his verse
So CSAP was right since beginning.
would divine simplicity have a page on the wiki explaining it?Divine Simplicity is the easiest explanation. That the divine is not of properties nor of any conformant of compositions about its physical or metaphysical nature.
Monad as Ultima describes it is the single origin point, an ineffable point beyond anything as the one and only true substance like the idea of Brahman in Hinduism.
Boundless is divine simplicity, so I think definition itself will cover it.would divine simplicity have a page on the wiki explaining it?
man, this shit confuses me. Won't stop me from trying to get alien x to boundless /jBoundless is divine simplicity, so I think definition itself will cover it.
Most likely impossible because there can be only one boundless being in cosmos {if they remove this disqualification , then statment for limitless power of Alien X can be used as it's 15 % and 100% both are equally limitless}man, this shit confuses me. Won't stop me from trying to get alien x to boundless /j
It means jokedo people know what /j means
Was this confirmed?It means joke
Because Alien X being boundless on new Tiering is a joke
None igApparently, I was wrong. Ha! Who would have imagined.
You're wrong
You're wrong.
You're wrong
You're wrong
…..are you good broMost likely impossible because there can be only one boundless being in cosmos {if they remove this disqualification , then statment for limitless power of Alien X can be used as it's 15 % and 100% both are equally limitless}
But best of luck for trying
Frdo people know what /j means
nah, you really saying the infinite tennyson strength isn't tier 0No character in Ben 10 qualifies for tier 0
No character in Ben 10 qualifies for tier 0
Alien X (Wanked)
Alien X is IMPOSSIBLE TO BEAT, and not bound by the limits and bounds of regular omnipotence! (Alien X Has Omnipotence^True Infinity x Omnipotence^True Infinity, So He Can Do Beyond Everything And Anything. Forever). He's above TOAA, Kami Tenchi, The Writer and Azathoth, because anything that he...joke-battles.fandom.com
Yeah, it would be great if our great Ben 10 supporters like @Lord_Farquaad69420 create a Tier 0 thread for Ax. That would be a sight to see.Doesn’t the existence of other celestial - sapiens automatically prevent Alien X from ever reaching Tier 0 if Monad is accepted as the determining factor?
I’d winYeah, it would be great if our great Ben 10 supporters like @Lord_Farquaad69420 create a Tier 0 thread for Ax. That would be a sight to see.
So strong
So strong
Just Outer? Not strong enough.
It’ll happen, let me cookJust Outer? Not strong enough.
This isn't wankedAlien X (Wanked)
Alien X is IMPOSSIBLE TO BEAT, and not bound by the limits and bounds of regular omnipotence! (Alien X Has Omnipotence^True Infinity x Omnipotence^True Infinity, So He Can Do Beyond Everything And Anything. Forever). He's above TOAA, Kami Tenchi, The Writer and Azathoth, because anything that he...joke-battles.fandom.com
We'll decide in the next thread.Guys what if Ultima's proposal for tier 0 and High 1-A+ fails ?
Wank. More like….prank….This isn't wanked
This is just a piece of shit
It seems he still has the majority though.We'll decide in the next thread.
Wouldn't that just be special kind of Type 4 Multiverse which should be High 1-A/or Tier 0? Unless R>F or monad is established in the series wouldn't it be far fetched to assume it to be High 1-A? Just wondering.Again, if you're saying that "possible worlds" is according to one set of axioms, it is plausible for a series to invoke a collection of "possible worlds" which explicitly extend over all axioms (i.e. having different such sets for different axioms), which would be broader than High 1-A+/0 under your system, causing an issue.
That sort of thing seems pretty coherent to me, so whichever weird way you decide to treat it (either ignoring such statements completely, putting them as equal to monads despite explicitly being above them, or taking a far lower interpretation of Low 1-A or something) is something I'd see as a flaw in the system.
I know. He was asking a hypothetical, and I was answering it.It seems he still has the majority though.
If a cosmology greater than that which a monad can create is tiered lower than or equal to a monad, that's a contradiction.Wouldn't that just be special kind of Type 4 Multiverse which should be High 1-A/or Tier 0? Unless R>F or monad is established in the series wouldn't it be far fetched to assume it to be High 1-A? Just wondering.