• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
1,221
569
We currently have two (third in the making, four if we count Gen V) Small Building level calcs/feats for the TV Series.
However, recently I updated an old calc I made, adding a vaporization end to it, resulting in 0.428 Tons of TNT, a.k.a. Building level.
Now, the only scaling we can make here is from two sources:
However, since the first one is more of an implication rather than a direct feat, and the second one is from a deleted scenes (available as extra content on the DVD/Blu-ray, alongside other deleted scenes that, honestly, don't contradict the canon at all), maybe the characters can receive a "Small Building level, possibly Building level" rating?
 
I don't see nothing inconsistent with it, I'd agree with an possibly 8-C rating as even if its a mention it isnt contradicted by any anti feat or anyone there themselves, while Maeve being top 2 is narratively a fact at least until SB and V'd up Butcher showed up

alsoooo I realized in that same scene Lamplighter resisted that sort of acidic spit from that Supe while the same one just got his face instantly burned by his vomit, wouldnt that warrant some kind of resistance to lighter? (hes supposedly has just human physical stats but thats actually impressive).
 
I don't see nothing inconsistent with it, I'd agree with an possibly 8-C rating as even if its a mention it isnt contradicted by any anti feat or anyone there themselves, while Maeve being top 2 is narratively a fact at least until SB and V'd up Butcher showed up
Yeah it's not contradictory at all imo, but one gotta keep in mind it does come from a deleted scene at the end of the day.
alsoooo I realized in that same scene Lamplighter resisted that sort of acidic spit from that Supe while the same one just got his face instantly burned by his vomit, wouldnt that warrant some kind of resistance to lighter? (hes supposedly has just human physical stats but thats actually impressive).
You can see later that he has bandages on his arms (or I'm getting Mandela effected) and I think his clothes would have helped a little bit.
Mayyyyyybe a very minor resistance to acid, but not much else for him in terms of his physicals.
 
Stormfront's feat should be finished and accepted before anything.
I know, I just pointed out to it because Dalesean himself said it was a 9-A feat, that he just needed to make the blog.
This seems fine. Someone should calc Stormfront wrecking that apartment complex for support.
In the works (at least I think). But we already have 2 feats for 9-A as well.
 
So would everyone in the Seven scale to this or at least those comparable to A-Train since he harmed Kimiko?
 
So would everyone in the Seven scale to this or at least those comparable to A-Train since he harmed Kimiko?
Everyone that currently is "At least Wall level, likely Small Building level" (plus, Temp V Hughie, Deep and maybe payback), would become "Small Building level, possibly Building level"
 
Oh, we’re doing the Season 4 scaling changes now?
Once everything is settled, yes.
Deep can fight Annie, A-Train scales to both, Hughie can hurt A-Train, and Payback can (sort of) take hits from a casual Soldier Boy, who can hurt Hughie, Annie, Kimiko and Noir like that.
 
I guess everything here is fine. But I would ignore the Stormfront calc for now as it's not even finished yet
 
Thanks Mav
I guess everything here is fine. But I would ignore the Stormfront calc for now as it's not even finished yet
Thanks for your input (And the sole reason I mention the Stormfront/apartment one is because Dalesean himself said he just had to upload it and that it was 9-A, but idk what happened lol, but it was just as an example)

Btw, this is more or less how Kimiko's and Annie's profiles would look like.
 
and the second one is from a deleted scenes (available as extra content on the DVD/Blu-ray, alongside other deleted scenes that, honestly, don't contradict the canon at all), maybe the characters can receive a "Small Building level, possibly Building level" rating?
I don't think there is a need to use this deleted scene to scale Maeve to 9-A/8-C (but I am not against using deleted scenes which are not inconsistent with the show Maeve can harm Stormfront who can harm Kimiko.
 
I don't think there is a need to use this deleted scene to scale Maeve to 9-A/8-C (but I am not against using deleted scenes which are not inconsistent with the show Maeve can harm Stormfront who can harm Kimiko.
Oh yeah, it's mostly to show that there is another support for scaling.

Specially since it's likely the scene was deleted merely because they couldn't properly fit it in the episode (they said that about other scenes) and not because they regretted making Maeve the second strongest.
 
Specially since it's likely the scene was deleted merely because they couldn't properly fit it in the episode (they said that about other scenes) and not because they regretted making Maeve the second strongest.
Yeah I agree that the deleted scenes from The Boys are canon (if they regretted these scenes they wouldn't have included them in the blu ray)
 
I think MM's statement is enough to give an 8-C rating, not just a "possibly/likely"
I don't think so. Nothing implied she would be able to tank it completely since she can regenerate from whatever damage he does to her. I think what he was implying by "pissing her off" was that doing that would injure her and then she would just heal and beat his ass. As it is I don't think it's very solid ground for a full rating.
 
I don't think so. Nothing implied she would be able to tank it completely since she can regenerate from whatever damage he does to her. I think what he was implying by "pissing her off" was that doing that would injure her and then she would just heal and beat his ass. As it is I don't think it's very solid ground for a full rating.
If she's pissed off by the attack that means she has enough durability to not be melted or vaporized, which is beyond what her regeneration can handle.
 
Last edited:
If she's pissed off by the attack that means she has enough durability to not be melted or vaporized, which is beyond what her regeneration can handle.
I didn't say she would be melted or vaporized, just horribly injured to the point where it'd piss her off. She can heal from a wide variety of lethal wounds so MM saying it'd piss her off doesn't hold that much weight.
 
I didn't say she would be melted or vaporized, just horribly injured to the point where it'd piss her off.
If she isn't vaporized her durability scales to the attack, whether her skin is burned or not doesn't really matter.
She can heal from a wide variety of lethal wounds so MM saying it'd piss her off doesn't hold that much weight.
She hasn't shown Mid High regen or close to it, and MM has never seen Kimiko have such a level of regeneration either.
 
I think MM's statement is enough to give an 8-C rating, not just a "possibly/likely"
I don't think so. Nothing implied she would be able to tank it completely since she can regenerate from whatever damage he does to her. I think what he was implying by "pissing her off" was that doing that would injure her and then she would just heal and beat his ass. As it is I don't think it's very solid ground for a full rating.
If she's pissed off by the attack that means she has enough durability to not be melted or vaporized, which is beyond what her regeneration can handle
I didn't say she would be melted or vaporized, just horribly injured to the point where it'd piss her off. She can heal from a wide variety of lethal wounds so MM saying it'd piss her off doesn't hold that much weight.
If she isn't vaporized her durability scales to the attack, whether her skin is burned or not doesn't really matter. She hasn't shown Mid High regen or close to it, and MM has never seen Kimiko have such a level of regeneration either.
@Just_Butchering @DarkDragonMedeus @Propellus @Maverick_Zero_X what do you think?
 
Back
Top