Limited Durability Negation - Durability negation doesn't count as being stronger than your opponent and getting through their guard, that's just strength and doesn't target vital organs or anything.
You can have duraneg that only works on weaker foes. You can also have limited duraneg that works on weaker foes.
Might be useless given you're stronger but ig it would just make them super dead instead of normal dead.
This just kind of depends on context, at direct face value, that is a "shockwave". Maybe not in the sense of like a bomb overpressure or what not, a visible transfer of force/energy through a medium as it exits out the other side. Or maybe it is a transonic one, if I was the artist that would be kind of how I'd convey it if that was my intent?
Now,
I wouldn't give duraneg for that, I'm not about to give it to this
or if we want a case where it absolutely is a shockwave but in a different form, in some cases it could just be the dude or something was pushed hard enough that it, well, ya know. Air and stuff gets pushed apart with high force and speed, so, well, a shockwave.
but I don't actually give a shit in this case, could be, could not be, would need to see the raws to see what's actually said, it could easily confirm that it's duraneg-flavored, or not.
i cant read korean tho in the slightest so I wouldnt be able to help there.
But for the shockwave stuff, that
IS a shockwave, at face value anyway, the question is more
why it's happening and
how it interacted with the person in question, or if it's meant to be literal even, but the latter would just be guesswork on our part and I'm not one for guessing authorial intent without damn good evidence or precedence for them, the author drew it so we have to take it as something that's physically there unless evidence suggests otherwise, but
how we take it, can very much vary. And I don't know enough about this verse or the context to comment on that without people link chapters or scans.
And I'm busy so I'm not gonna read it.
- This is not analytical prediction, this is just learning and adapting.
Information Analysis. Still an ability.
Though making use of that analysis to accurately predict your foe's actions by wiki standards does qualify for analprediction.
Not very good analytical prediction mind you, but I'd say it barely scraps by, that's assuming his predictions in what people do ends up consistently being accurate tho.
If he still gets shit wrong frequently and it's on
his end, not the foe being Raiden or Batman to where lmao, then yeah I'd say that's just "normal" prediction and wouldn't exactly count towards an "ability".
Needs to at least be superhuman or
consistent enough to be a thing. I don't know if it is because I haven't been shown scans for it, so take this as a "if it is legit, it's fine, if it isn't, it isn't imo".
- Greater Durability Negation - Can't be greater if it's not there in the first place.
There's no scan so idk what's "supposed to be greater". In fact, depending on what that scan might be, it could confirm, or deny, the above. Like if the verse establishes duraneg-like shockwaves as a thing already and other people can do it, that makes the threshold for scrutiny here way lower.
EDIT but edit before I post: Checked profile, this dude has very blatantly explicit duraneg slop via shockwaves and vibrations.
Honestly? I don't like how this was removed from the OP, this is super important context.
We have a character who in his second key is stated to be able to use shockwaves that pass by stuff to attack internally.
And it looks like THIS
And then we have the same character doing that exact same thing,
drawn the exact same way, in a weaker key, but it's just a smaller scale? This is the exact same type of "shockwave" drawn in the baby key, just larger because he's way better at it now?
Yeah no this is legit, what are we doing? It's just the same thing that's explained directly and even shown directly how it can damage inside stuff, hell they even technically say he's been doing it his whole life it's just gotten better over time, with there being cross sections of the internals with huge gaping holes.
1. No real evidence in how many punches this was done. On screen it was 3, but we know he was punching beforehand.
If they show us 3, and if what they say is true with 3sfx. It's probably just 3. Less assumptions the better, both ways.
2. This look's more like a cone, it's much deeper in the middle, like a cone, I'd only accept forearm and- wait, it should be forearm and hand length minus the fingers.
Tbh, it looks like some ****** up irregular pyramid with a smoothed top given the edges, you could calc it. if it was me I'd just get the actual area and spend way to long calculating the exact volume. Most people won't do that so whatever shape it's close enough to, should be fine as an approximate.
Though, he is in fact closer to the PoV.
This is technically a good thing? It means the actual crater is a lil bit lowended.
I don't think I need to explain but if you scale a skyscraper from 100m away to a coke can 1cm next to you, you're gonna get like a 50cm tall skyscraper even if it's actually 100m.
Basic depth and foreshortening and all that. The impact is a bit further back so it looks smaller than it actually is and if you scale something in front of it, it inflates it by a lil bit. In this case it wouldn't be much, but the crater prob like 5% bigger than it was scaled so...
I don't care, gets the certified "it's not just good, it's good enough" sticker and in a way that's not inflation but slight deflation, it's fine.
Depth is kind of omega inflated tho, it isn't THAT deep. 44cm is kind of huge, you can even kind of see how concaved it is due the top-down tilted angle, it's kind of deep, but it ain't THAT deep. Tbh, I'm not whipping out the trigonomics and ******* line scalings for this someone else can but it's more like, his hand's depth in, well, depth. So it's a lil of both? Inflated depth but also a bit lowballed everywhere else?
J interrupts Yu from punching Fabrizio
Wow, it's been 2 years since I saw this calc, and it's been there for 2 years despite being wrong.
1. There is no evidence J moves all of that distance within the timeframe of Yu punching, he could have been much much closer, this calc accepts a highball.
Idk wtf is going on there.
Like I get the idea, bro starts far away, manages to move big distance in time dude's fist moving mid-punch.
My concern is, do we know he began moving after the punch, or was the punch thrown while he was moving? The scans in the feat link don't show when the punch is thrown.
If, hypothetically, the prior page shows the dude throwing his punch, and then all that happens, yeah the feat is feat is "close enough", could be done better but eh.
If, we don't though, feat is unquantifiable, he could've started moving before the punch was thrown so you can't say he made it all the way there in so-and-so a time. you just can't, it's not the same feat anymore, that isn't what happened, or at least, can't prove it.
Hmm, the dude does say "finish him" and then jesus over there begins moving, so it's probably about the same time? But the other dude would still need to reel back his punch in response to being told to "do it"? So that should prob be accounted for at least and then maybe it'd be fine? At that point I'd shrug and say best we could do with what we got while factoring is the intent of "he move big while dude punch" which does seem to be what's trying to be conveyed, so do that ig?
Also you wanna do pytha-, oh nvm.
My opinion is it's a shockwave but
how we treat it, can vary from absolutely nothing to absolutely something idk need more context. Which I ended up getting, it's just his explicit limited duraneg on a baby scale, keep it just explain it better so this doesn't happen again.
It's 100% infoanal at least, so if they don't have that listed, that needs to be added, it could be analprecog too depending on the consistency and accuracy of it though so need more context.
Calc 1 is both inflated via depth but deflated via everything else.
Calc 2, eh **** it idk factor in the pull back of the punch and I personally would be fine with it given the intent of the scene and what we have to work with.
Now fight to the death because I didn't take an explicit side and think it's lil of both.
