CodeCCLL
He/Him- 2,380
- 1,215
So let me make this clear. If the OP recommends Hypertimeline with justification that I find reasonable, I agree with the OP, otherwise I disagree.Also, this CRT was limited to Universes and otherworlds, not dimensions, so using that feat regarding Rimuru;s BFR would be better.
Doesn't Ultima always say things like "if I don't comment on the thread in question, don't use what I say"?Actually, it would be nice if I could post my DM messages here, because when I ask to Ultima about thinks like "going back to destroyed time", "bringing back destroyed time", or "going back to the beginning of time", he said "no".
DT is absolutely right that this does not require a hypertimeline, but in Rimuru's case this is not the case, there are extra factors.This example is good for this... And you can think that it's also applies to the place I have scribbled in black above.
Time travel is possible between independent and parallel/non-parallel timelines in the same space, I even gave an example from Ultima in the previous revision... Different timelines, not parallel, not flowing in the same directions but still not hypertimeline and in DT's example time travel is still possible...
Isn't each point in the space-time continuum a snapshot? The system explained above does not allow there to be two Chloes at one point at the same time, so the timeline branches into another timeline. The system includes the time axis used by Rimuru, so the system can create new branches for each snapshot. In my opinion, two extremely logical arguments support each other.So rather than travelling from a universe/timeline to an another destroyed timeline or travelling something like that, think like that a timeline having 4-D timelines and multiverses at it's own time points/snapshots...