ZespeonGalaxy
He/Him- 1,571
- 1,027
Not on vsbw anymore igYeah, whatever happened to Mario and his paper counterpart being one profile, anyway? I thought they were essentially the same character.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not on vsbw anymore igYeah, whatever happened to Mario and his paper counterpart being one profile, anyway? I thought they were essentially the same character.
A crt split the canon so we now consider them different characters.Yeah, whatever happened to Mario and his paper counterpart being one profile, anyway? I thought they were essentially the same character.
Welcome to the team.Also hi all I'd like to help the process of rebuilding.
Not canon technical just different universes in the same multiverseA crt split the canon so we now consider them different characters.
Will it be like boo and cover the many variationsKoopa Troopa, Dry Bones, and Goomba as of right now
Yeah, whatever happened to Mario and his paper counterpart being one profile, anyway? I thought they were essentially the same character.
Not on vsbw anymore ig
For awhile I thought Paper Mario and Mario were distinct for a number of reasons, but yeah, recently someone brought to my attention the large amount of evidence that the non-Paper games acknowledge Paper as just being another form of the main Mario canon, and not it's own distinct canon.A crt split the canon so we now consider them different characters.
None of these arguments are new to my knowledgeFor awhile I thought Paper Mario and Mario were distinct for a number of reasons, but yeah, recently someone brought to my attention the large amount of evidence that the non-Paper games acknowledge Paper as just being another form of the main Mario canon, and not it's own distinct canon.
Like the fact that the original Paper Mario was going to just be a stylized sequel to Super Mario RPG aside, often the Paper games and their stories are talked about in past tense in 'main' series games when they come up in 'nostalgia' sections recounting other older games, or when simply discussing past games events, and there are even moments in the Paper games that refer to past non-Paper games stories and/or lore as canon to Paper.
Nearly all the Mario games (excluding fringe cases like Hotel Mario for obvious reasons) seem to share canon in that regard, and that's something that Miyamoto himself actually confirmed in an interview: When asked about how there are multiple Links, and if there were multiple Marios, he and Aonuma agreed that Mario is always the same.
I dont see why notWould baby Mario get his own profile
Maybe, what P&A does Baby Mario have?Would baby Mario get his own profile
He can get some stuff from double dash, yoshis island, partners in time, and a few kart games from the top of my headMaybe, what P&A does Baby Mario have?
Don't.I dont see why not
There's a plan for that too apparently.To me the biggest thing against Paper Mario and regular Mario being the same Mario is the fact Paper Jam exists.
Will it be like boo and cover the many variations
Baby SpongeBob is only shown in flash backs and am pretty sure current loony toons canon standards have bugs bunny born from a drawing. What do you mean by list anywayDon't.
Look I don't like how blunt I come out, but that's like making a profile for Baby SpongeBob or Baby Bugs Bunny, etc: They are also the same but in different time periods, it's ultimately redundant basically. Besides it will potentially mess up the list I have if we treat them as separately.
I have a CRT planned myself for Mario and Green Stache.Baby SpongeBob is only shown in flash backs and am pretty sure current loony toons canon standards have bugs bunny born from a drawing. What do you mean by list anyway
Maybe not, but were they rejected on VSBW? I feel like they're pretty relevant, especially the fact the creators essentially say Mario is composite across the games.None of these arguments are new to my knowledge
Yeah they were rejected due to what is shown being more important than what is said or something
Its Explicitly said that oh noes dimentios invincibility is gone! I dont know how its twisted into just a durability thing.you're tellin me, I got a few people arguin the legitimacy of Super Dimentio's invulnerability
Naw, you're pulling my leg, so it's not just the absolute low hanging "7-B" Nerf from archchompy but now this?? XDIts Explicitly said that oh noes dimentios invincibility is gone! I dont know how its twisted into just a durability thing.
Yeah no, turns out it's high class BS, Me and Sabe were just talking about it.
TBH I don't think he has invulnerability anyway, not true invulnerability anyway. That shit is misused like mad on this wiki like we unironically treat Super forms as being able to face tank attacks from dudes infinitely stronger than them because we give them invulnerability like that's dumb as hell, 9 times outta 10 invulnerability is just freakishly high durability by the standards of the verse.
That would be supremely based but it'll never happen, I know the requirements to get it became more strict but a lot of profiles haven't had it enforced on them yetthat wack-ass ability should be axed from the site then
I told you it is the AP equivalent of Durability Negation like 3 time AStrangeverse where do you keep getting the plot thing from
They are wrong but given how there are more sonic supports and the invulnerability paper being incomprehensible to most of the site they got away with along with countless other pages.that's how it was originally for the Super Forms in Sonic the Hedgehog, despite the very clear implications that they're invincible
but somehow, their invulnerability got the greenlight, while bastards like Super Dimentio's are up for debate
I demand some justice be enacted on this bullshittery
HiWho?
And what do u know another mod fra parroting the mods how fun!you're tellin me, I got a few people arguin the legitimacy of Super Dimentio's invulnerability