- 1,869
- 830
- Thread starter
- #81
bump
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
bumpI'm supposed to see scans here to know where this information came from.
Seems like those so-called concepts were established and discussed before, though, I don't know jack about the verse so it is preferred if you can explain the Power of Infinity or link a discussion about it. Removing the concept of "sexual desire" is very well a type 3 concept at best, since it's just some wacky shit that circulates around human desires and not a concept that is fundamental to reality.
Miracles and infinity are implied to be abstract concepts judging by the context of these scans shown. Though, those concepts weren't elaborated comprehensively, so those 2 things being a type 3 concept is the best I can assign.
"Breasts" being a universal concept is horrendously crazy honestly, but I don't think I'm the type who can deny the presented evidence. I don't inherently have a strict issue with "breasts" being a universal concept then.
So far up to here, the only thing you presented as a type 2 concept is this so-called "breast" thing. And this so-called "breast" concept doesn't seem to fall under your proposal of type 2 conceptual manipulation. You haven't provided sufficient scans with clear comprehensive explanations of these terms you mentioned, other than sexual desire, miracles and infinity; the only evidence that I see that can substantiate those 3 things being remote concepts is that they are embodied and personified -- it wasn't explained how those 3 concepts are fundamental or pervasive across reality. Type 3 conceptual manipulation is the best I can do for manipulating "sexual desire", "infinity" and "miracles". I won't be accepting anything else pertaining to CM beyond this unless you provide scans with in-depth context that further supports this proposal of yours.
Not sure how much of this has remotely anything to do with all the previous information of the OP. I'm not even sure what the proposal is here.
I'll get to this later.
Low-Mid regeneration negation seems more reasonable to me. Considering that the Gods have to accelerate their regeneration capability to Low-Godly, but it'll always be Low-Mid at the start. The context of the scans of this proposal expressed the Blazing Inferno of Scorching Flames as something powerful enough to harm Gods, but I don't see enough specific detail that it can negate any degree of their regeneration. Perhaps the Blazing Inferno was used against the Gods at the start, and could negate their Low-Godly regeneration as a byproduct, though this wouldn't be Low-Godly regeneration negation since you're not inhibiting their Low-Godly regen directly.
This is fine.
Uh... what's your proposal for this? I don't seem to understand.
Trust the process, 3 more months of bumping and a few staff members will probably check it out. (I wish)This going nowhere![]()
This going to nonexistent plane, this is so sad. Welp, going back to reading DxD fanfictions until new thing come upThis going nowhere![]()