Personally, the one I find legit is the second one. The other ones... eeehhhh, I guess I'll need to look at them some more to form a proper opinion...
Anyways, it would seem there are a few recurring arguments as to why the second one is wrong that I will attempt to address:
-Cinematic time\artistic license: Firstly, there is no indication that there was any time distortion between the shots (e.g. there was no slow motion, no speed up, no weird close ups e.t.c), it was just Naruto jumping, Shikamaru saying something and then Naruto arriving to Toneri. I personally interpret that as in the time it took for Shika to warn Naruto, he had already reached Toneri as opposed to some weird time change. If there was straight up slow-mo like when Naruto punched Toneri then by all means doubt it, but not in this case. Furthermore, is it really fair to second guess pretty much every feat in the movie just because it is in animated format even though we have no concrete evidence to doubt it? I mean we know its canon. What about a series who's canon only exists in said animated format (e.g. RWBY)? Do they not have a right to calcs cuz every time-frame can be chalked up to "cinematic timing"? How is this any worse than straight up arbitrarily assuming time-frames for a calc (like we do for some of our accepted calcs)?
-Travel speed as opposed to combat speed: under normal circumstances I would agree that this is an issue, but it appears that some of our accepted calcs as of late (e.g. someone mentioned the Mimihagi calc.) have ignored this distinction. Letting it slide for them and making a big fuss out of it now seems like a double standard to me.
-The Earth's size/distance is inconsistent: Much like the last point, size inconsistences are not usually taken into account for calcs as it is physically impossible for the author/animator to draw things on the exact same scale every time. We tend to take the clearest, cleanest version of the object and personaly I don't think the Earth's size/distance gets any clearer than in the shot we already have. Now, if there is a size inconsistency in the exact same shot, then yes there would be a problem, but not in this case. Besides, for this calc the only thing that matters is that Toneri (and by extension Naruto) traveled from sunlight-shadow-sunlight, and seeing as he was moving in a straight line across the diameter of he Earth, size inconsistency wouldn't influence the calc. anyway.
-Its an outlier: now this one I don't understand. Firstly, the Narutoverse has already breached "sub-rel" speeds with Toneri's sword so I don't see why this is such a shock. Secondly, this would only apply to people of The Last Naruto's level (which means most God-Tiers and some top,Top Tiers) so no Tier discrepancy is created. Thirdly, the current Naruto speed calc. (besides Toneri's sword) that put the God Tiers at Mach 1700 (iirc) applies more concretely to people like 1-Rinnegan Madara. Then you have people like Guy who could completely outspeed him, then theres people like Sasuke who were even faster, and then you have Kaguya who is even faster than that. Basically what I'm saying is that our current calc. is valid but is an absolute low end that doesn't really accurately represent the speed of everyone. Besides, this was a time-skip so power-ups are to be expected, no? Finally, while it is a fairly steep upgrade in Movement Speed for the concerned characters, its not like its unheard of. I mean Yhwach went from "small continent level" to "At least Moon level" due to a calc and no one batted an eyelid. We even took the high end. And you can be certain that when Ichigo goes from "MH" to "sub-rel" (for inevitably matching Yhwach at least to an extent) no one is going to have an issue with that even though the calc that created the "sub-rel" rating has an assumed time-frame (no offence to the calc. or its maker) which imho is no different than what we are dealing with right now.
To summarise, I personally think the 2nd one is legit and most arguments against it (besides the cinematic time argument, which while being a proper concern has no basis) are simple nitpicks. It would seem that this was also the concensus of the OBD (not saying that they are always right but I agree with them this time). I'll reserve judgement on the other calcs for now and will examine them some more to see if I can form a proper opinion on them. Sorry about the wall of text but might as well be thorough so I don't have to post a dozen different messages explaining my reasoning. Anyways, I'm probably going to bed now, good night guys.
p.s. I mean no offence to RWBY or Bleach and any related caculations/calculation group members. I only mentioned those particular verses cuz they were the first thing I could come up with that is related to my points...
