• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Status
Not open for further replies.
Messages
910
Reaction score
367
Intro:
This is a very lengthy thread will be going over numerous statements, feats and cals from the movies, novels and creative team statements such as:
1. Enchantress confirmed to be weaker than the Old Gods and Uxas and why that is significant.
2. Doomsday stated to be able to explode and destroy the planet, why it's in one attack given the context, as well as why the krypton moon busting is not as vague as the site presumes it is.
3. The correct way to calculate the world engine.
4. Why the top tiers in the verse scale to the motherboxes.
5. Multiple statements implying Darkseid is the strongest villain in the universe.

Please take the time to read all of this and understand the points being made.

Should be noted that 5-B Motherboxes was accepted here.

1. Enchantress Scaling (High 6-A)
Firstly, it needs to be established that Enchantress’ world destroying machine in Suicide Squad isn’t a miracle machine that she doesn’t scale to. Quite the contrary as the official suicide squad novelisation confirms.

With her machine,
Stated she would cover the earth in darkness, grinding their cities and mountains into dust, wiping them out and destroying the entire world.

Textbook surface wiping.

It stated numerous time that the machine is merely using her power. With her stating: “I am the power that empowers my machine, my life gives it strength”, “powered not by electricity but by her magic”. It’s then stated that she didn’t need the machine to crush humanity but rather with natural power and was doing this for fun. It was basically sadistic way of punishing humanity for forsaking serving her and her brother as Gods in servitude of technology instead. The machine was basically a tool for her to throw around with her power. She should scale to her machines energy output. This is EXTREMELY significant because enchantress was around and alive on earth during Darkseid’s invasion.

The timeline goes as follows:
Enchantress and her brother come to earth in 4358 B.C…Darkseid and his forces invade earth ≈ 3000 B.C…Enchantress and her brother are sealed/killed in 1984 B.C. We can extrapolate that Darkseid invaded earth around 3000 B.C because The War of the Gods was stated to have happened 5000 years ago and ares directly ended the united world that was formed to stand against darkseid to which Hippolyta described as it being "for a brief time" and "it did not last", meaning that Darkseid's invasion happened not too long before The War of the Gods, with the amazons saying the fire to alert the world of man has not burned in 5000 years.

This is EXTREMELY important because during the live trailer breakdown of zsjl, when ZS was asked how strong Uxas was at the time he invaded earth his answer was “ONLY THE OLD GODS COULD STAND AGAINST HIM”, despite the fact that enchantress was around at that time. This means that young Uxas>>enchantress. In that same live he then, says Uxas, steppenwolf and doomsday are all comparable in strength, meaning everyone in that ww tier and above should scale. This is consistent with the fact that Ww was created as a weapon to be used against The Old Gods and should logically be somewhere around their peaks, with ares stating that she had the power to "restore him to the God he once was" after feeding off her energy.

When enchantress tells her brother of her plan his response is “Will God stand for this?” To which she says “They’ve forgotten about God and he’s forgotten about them”. This implies that there was a higher deity than them, that they could not defy. With recent confirmations that enchantress having connections with Apokolips by David Ayer, it’s very likely that “God” they were talking about was Darkseid as he was the God of apocalypse. This is also consistent with the fact that earth had actually forgotten about Darkseid and he had “lost earths location. Just some food for thought.

“Amader Waller stated she was the most powerful metahuman they’ve encountered so no one should scale”.

This statement is made of enchantress in her fodder form without a heart. The one that fodder characters like deadshot can scrap with and block attacks from her. The statement was also made in the montage where Waller is listing all the members of the squad and is likely in reference to her being the strongest in the squad. Amanda also shouldn’t necessarily even be a reputable source at this point in time. It’s still very early on in the dc universe and its stated she started researching about metahumans after superman died to look for solutions to protect themselves in his absence, with ss taking place only a few months AFTER his death Most metahumans are still in hiding or are conspiracy theories. It’s far too early for her to be actually educated on the exact limit of these beings power.

superman is not a metahuman, the flash is canonically holding back, cyborg canonically became an incel after he was turned and did not go out at all, aquaman is under water most of the time, and Wonder Woman only made short appearances in ww1 and the abandoned port of Gotham city in the entirety of her time in the world of man, with her becoming a superhero again at the end of ww2017, AFTER ss2016. There's no proof she's properly educated on the upper limits of their powers, Snyders statement should supersede. They also don't necessarily even have to contradict each other seeing as Enchantress can be the strongest metahuman and others can still scale to her, while The Old Gods surpass her, they can all still be in the same tier, even with if you take this statement as fact.

2. Doomsday Scaling (At least High 6A, possibly 5B)
In the bvs watch party, ZS said Doomsday would charge an explosion that would destroy the world here:

(2:45:16)
“Booshing” is referring to doomsday releasing a mass of energy that his body absorbed from attacks against him. This means that ww and superman can charge doomsday enough for him to destroy the world in a few hits.

It needs to be established that the statement isn NOT saying doomsday would explode repeatedly and would eventually destroy the earth but rather he would do this in one attack. The first interpretation doesn’t even make sense given how his powers work. The quote being “The notion was that he would charge up and that’s how he would eventually destroy the world”. The “he would charge up” part implies a singular explosion, and the fact that he needs to charge up for this in itself means it can only be one explosion for reasons below.

This is the only interpretation that makes sense because a hypothetical fourth evolution doomsday could not be harmed by anyone or anything on the planet at this point enough to force him to charge and explosion. We know this because doomsday adapted past nukes in his 2nd evolution and then superman one shotted him, forcing him to adapt again, to which he gained enough strength to overpower supes and ww. Fourth evolution doomsday would absolute one shot supes and ww instantly.

It’s stated numerous times throughout the movie that superman can destroy earth if he wanted to and humanity would NOT be able to stop him by batman who has been monitoring his power and that narrative is batman's entire motivation throughout the film. This means superman>anything humanity is capable of. It's also stated that Wonder Woman's "booooosh" is more powerful than any bomb that has ever been made. So as stated above nothing on the planet would be able to charge him to explode past this fourth evolution that was seconds away from happening as scene here:

Just directly before he is killed he’s literally charging up another boosh and is about to explode before he’s stopped. This is why superman does not waste time to sacrifice his life, doesn’t bother giving Diana the spear even though she wouldn’t be weakened by it. There was simply not enough time and they knew if he evolved again, no one would be able to stop him and Zack confirms that explosion would have ended the world. This means the only way doomsday could explode and destroy the planet is by superman and ww charging him up.

In conclusion this hypothetical fourth explosion HAS to be the world ending one seeing as if doomsday evolves again after this, nothing and no one will be able to harm him as he would have evolved even further past superman and ww.

Supporting evidence:
(Ik this next one isn’t sufficient on its own, it’s just supporting evidence that these beings can be on this level, don’t attempt to debate against this point as it’s just supplementary and isn’t intended to stand on its own) . I’m referring to the shattered moon on krypton. Steppenwolf is stated to have battled doomsday. This is obviously referring to the original doomsday on krypton.

Common rebuttals to this feat.
  1. I don’t trust this magazine”. It’s from the Hollywood spotlight magazine in which they interview the voice actor for steppenwolf. Here’s a link u can buy it if u want to check it out for yourself. The burden of proof is on you to prove why it’s not reliable.
  2. “We don’t know how he destroyed the moon.” Well that may be true we do know how doomsdays behave. We know that doomsday doesn’t just crash out and destroy inanimate objects for no reason unless he’s exploding. He goes after life. So he either shattered it via collateral damage or he booshed it away. either way he should scale.
  3. “It just says steppenwolf survived, he could literally have gotten one shot”. The magazine quote reads “Steppenwolf survived a battle with doomsday. That should tell you how strong he is.” It is incredibly disingenuous to say he got one shot as the quote was intended to show that steppenwolf was formidable and not just a descriptive text of a past event. The only feat that doomsday has is the moon shattering feat leading us to believe “that should tell you how strong he is” is in reference to that. Even the literal meaning for the word “battle” does not support being one shot but can be described as a sustained struggle.
  4. “It’s far higher than anything else in the verse.” That’s just blatantly wrong as this thread will show.
  5. “He didn’t destroy it he just split it”. This is false, as we get to see a 3D view of it here, it’s clearly destroyed and all over the place. Even the INverse krypton astrology that humans were able to decode from the scout-ship says it’s been destroyed and exists and a cloud of debris implying parts of it has been pulverised.
  6. "It says he has nigh immortality". that's clearly in reference to his longevity as he has been around for thousands of years. As we see in JL he doesn't have region and can still die if enough damage is inflicted.
  7. It says lex works with steppenwolf in the movie”. This doesn’t contradict anything in the snydercut. In the opening scene we literally see that lex luthor has made in contact with steppenwolf. You can’t prove lex wasn’t working with him as their conversation was off screened. With lex saying at the end of bvs “The God is dead and they’ve heard it and they’re coming”, implying future plans have been shared. Him working with apokolips also isn’t unheard of and was supposed to be explored further in the future movies as the story boards suggest.
Again this is just supporting evidence and does NOT NEED to stand on its own. Entirely dismissing this issue when it matches the “world destroying” interpretation that Zack has of the bvs doomsday should not be taken lightly and needs a ponderous amount of evidence and argumentation to prove otherwise.

3. The correct way to calc the World Engine. (High 6A, possibly higher)
I made a thread on this a while back in which I went back n forth with a staff member for a bit. Made a huge rebuttal to their points and he/she just replied with “I still disagree” with no logical rebuttal, then proceeded to ghost the thread, But here I am again. The man of steel official novelization and vfx clarifies what is actually doing and how it works.

Firstly it should be noted that the world engine is confirmed to be hitting earth with a beam of focused gravity, or waves of gravity , as well as specifically stated to be g-force numerous times by both Hamilton and the narrator of the novel.
In doing this they were increasing the earths gravity, its mass and its density.

And then later stated that if it kept up, humans would die from the gravity alone because our internal organs will be crushed. It is VERY IMPORTANT to keep it at the back of your mind that it’s doing all of this by hitting it with pure focused gravity and/or g-force and not the other way around. It is NOT a direct mass or density generator, rather these are side effects of the earth’s gravity increasing because it obviously doesn’t make sense for it to increase without its mass or density increasing either. The end goal to increase the earths gravity to be akin to krypton's. Very easy way to calculate this.

firstly we have to figure out how much it was increasing the earths surface gravity. According to this, surface gravity would need to be around 5gs to start crushing internal organs. Using stardestroyer.net’s planetary parameter, we can find out the stats of the hypothetical earth, with 5gs to get the total gravitational energy the WE would be supplying earth in its run.

The WE would be pumping enough gravity to bring the earths gbe from 2.240E+32 to 5.600E+33.
5.600E+33-2.240e+32= 5.376e+33
The WE would need to have generated 5.376e+33 joules to increase the earths GBE like that.

When asked how long it would take,Hamilton says metropolis has a few hours and the rest of the planet has a few weeks. He then later on says that his first calc wrong, the gravitational field is growing faster and that metropolis only has less than an hour. His calculations would have to be an exponential one and not a linear addition. This is because he states that the world engine and the black zero are sending the gravitational waves back and forth to each other with each ping having greater energy than before. With this information we can extrapolate that the new time frame would also be less than a week because dr. Hamilton himself stated that each gravitational wave gets stronger per pound so his formula to get the original few weeks timeframe would be exponential and not a liner addition or something akin to that. I have a very VERY long calc that shows the an exact timeframe with complex algebra and exponential functions but it’s really not worth the result, (if you are interested can link it below) so for now lets just assume one week as a lowball.

There are 604800 seconds in a week.
The WE hits the earth every 3.85 seconds
Approximately 157091 hits in a week.
5.600E+33/157091 =
3.5648128e+28 joules or Multi-Continental

In the initial thread where I proposed this, the staff member disagreed because he thought that it was stated that it was going to compress the planets core with him thinking that statement must definitely mean it's shrinking the planet therefore it should not scale to the GBE of the planet. this interpretation is wrong for many reasons as I'll explain below.
1. It's never even stated compress the words used are "made dense" and "compact", which feeds the interpretation above of adding mass without increasing size, thus increasing density as well density.
2. Absolutely no where is it ever stated that the planet would change in size throughout the entirety of the movie, novel and interviews.
3. It is physically impossible to compress solid matter, only gases can be compressed. Especially when you're doing it by increasing it with gravity.
4. Even if we say it was shrinking the planet which is NOT supported, it wouldn't matter because it's not doing this via shrinking ray, it's literally just supplying the earth enough gravity to the point where it pulls itself in.

even when I asked chat got how to calculate the total energy of a machine doing this, it suggested we use the earth's gbe and agreed with this method. here is the conversation.
In conclusion: the world engine is specifically stated to be increasing the earths gravity by sending focused gravitational waves into the planet and should scale to increasing its total GBE and not just “surface wiping”. This is NOT crazy at all seeing as in the nightmare scene in man of steel, Zod who is very familiar with world engines imagined it increasing earths gravity so much to the point that it shattered the moon and and drew the earth closer to the sun by a very significant distance as seen here:

They are even capable of turning Krypton's core into a neutron star. The mass to energy conversion wouldn't even be an outlier since it's increasing the earths mass via gravity waves which are confirmed to travel at the speed of light. Although I'm unfamiliar with how to calculate how much energy it would take the do all of those things, I am open to suggestions below.

4. Mother box scaling (5-B)

Firstly it should be established that it’s never once stated, implied or asserted that the characters are not capable of overpowering the boxes. Whenever they ask why can’t they destroy the boxes, it’s always some hax reason and not an Ap issue. Rather, it is emphasised throughout the movie that the mother boxes cannot be stopped with brute force NOT because no one scales to it but because they are INDESTRUCTIBLE as shown here.

The context being if u try and blow one up with brute force you’ll only strengthen its bond, however if you can weaken its bond to eliminate that hax ability, you can harm/destroy them with brute force.

An example of this is when victor links with the mother boxes, the flash can generate a catastrophic energy surge (granted it was with a little bit of prep time) that will break its defences propelling victor into the unity, fusing with the boxes. With there being a simulation showing what happens. This proves with enough force/energy you can harm the boxes baring, you find a way to bypass its hax.

“The mother boxes defences don’t scale to it”. It is incredibly disingenuous to say that this Planet busting machine that operates using electricity as well as shown here, is somehow vulnerable to Small Country level’s of electricity in anyway whatsoever. Especially when it’s being done with share raw power and no hax. We know the boxes don’t need to be fully formed to be used as shown when they resurrected superman, created cyborg, yet when it initially rejects cyborg as shown here, the energy wave just makes him scream a little, but he is able to fend it off.
Once again solidifying that Barry momentarily overpowered/harmed the boxes, and the characters scale to it. Again it is never once stated, implied or asserted they don’t scale to the boxes.

Zeus did the same thing. Zeus has absolutely no connection to the mother boxes like cyborg does. This leads me to believe he has limited outer durability negation as he didn’t need a conduit like the flash did. He’s physically overpowering them in the most blatant way possible as he’s forcing them to split beyond their will.

The final nail in the coffin for the argument that they scale to the boxes is the fact Superman destroyed them as Desaad says here. At first I thought this was talking about its functionality but I was wrong. There’s evidence for physical damage being done to the boxes. After he splits the unity the mother boxes go from having a glossy shiny look to losing their reflectiveness and beginning to look matte and rough, as well as having what appears to be burnt marks on its surface. Here’s a before and after:


This is also consistent with the fact that it wasn’t necessarily the apokoliptian characters that were scared of superman but the boxes themselves, instantly rising as soon as he died.

“He didn’t do it alone” that’s irrelevant to the point being made, the point being that these characters should scale to the boxes.

“Cyborg hacked into it” as we see from the visual and the statements regarding the plan, all cyborg did was:
  1. position it in a place where it could be split back into three.
  2. weaken its bond so it could be vulnerable to brute force. Nothing about weakening its outer durability. If you believe he did such, the burden of proof is on you.
The focus of this specific feat should not necessarily be the fact that it was split but the fact that it was destroyed with visible damages, while being fine and functioning before the split. We know this because the person who confirms the boxes are destroyed (desaad) is not currently linked to the boxes. This means He’s literally going of what he saw alone, and Darkseid himself agrees with him saying “we will use the old ways”, again solidifying that visible damage had been done to them. Desaad and Darkseid also have no clue how or if they even bypassed the hax yet darkseid is like yep, I’m coming to earth to kill all of u, after he directly stares down the JL, implying he doesn’t think mother box tiers of power are a threat to him.

“So why did the motherboxes kill them all at the end?” The motherboxes are stated to be able to rearrange matter at the will of its master on an atomic scale. All this means is that the JL do not have resistance to atomic durability negation which is coherently accepted by the site. There is no circular scaling. To argue that they didn’t survive it because they were too weak, you would have to prove that they have a resistance to atomic durability negation, yet couldn’t withstand this because of a power issue.

In conclusion, the motherboxes were extremely troublesome because of hax reasons and not necessarily raw power with the JL and Zeus having feats that should place them on its level.

5. There are also 3 statements that imply that darkseid is greater than other villain in the universe.
  1. Stated to be the universe’s greatest villain in the same passage talking about krypton’s doomsday.
  2. Stated to be the “king daddy of the universe” by Zs despite Zack saying the real doomsday is still out there.
  3. Stated to be "The ultimate force to be reckoned with".

Darkseid was intended to be the grand final boss of the dceu that would be the biggest challenge the earth had ever faced. It makes a lot of sense for him to be the stronger than anything doomsday or enchantress are capable of.

These aren't even the highest interpretation of the characters with it being stated that wonder woman's explosion/scream when Steve Trevor died "made the stars in space tremble", likely being literal. The jl2 and 3 storyboards also say all the stars in the universe will go out because of what Darkseid's power over anti-life on earth, in reponse to green lantern saying some stars have gone missing, once again being literal.

part two will be brief going over some speed stuff.

thanks for reading

Agree: Maverick_Zero_X, DarkDragonMedeus, Ozcantabak, GrayCraft_Dragon, GoldenVoid, Planck69, Hellbeast, Viott
Neutral:
Disagree
 
Last edited:
The Enchantress scaling is pretty solid based on what's provided, but what was the evidence for her superweapon being High 6-A? I don't remember the exact statements and the profile has no sources.

Neutral on Doomsday's world-destroying statement for now.

Your World Engine calc would need to be put in a blog post and accepted to see if it checks out mathematically.

I can see Mother Box scaling via Desaad's statement (as a likely/possibly rating), and agree that the JL dying to Matter Manipulation doesn't disqualify them from scaling.

Darkseid being the strongest villain also seems straightforward.

Edit:



(2:45:16)

After finding the timestamp and hearing the exact quote it's clear Snyder meant Doomsday would destroy the world via an explosion (as opposed to an overtime rampage), so the High 6-A interpretation seems fine.
 
Last edited:
Add timestamps

Common rebuttals to this feat.
  1. I don’t trust this magazine”. It’s from the Hollywood spotlight magazine in which they interview the voice actor for steppenwolf. Here’s a link u can buy it if u want to check it out for yourself. The burden of proof is on you to prove why it’s not reliable.
  2. “We don’t know how he destroyed the moon.” Well that may be true we do know how doomsdays behave. We know that doomsday doesn’t just crash out and destroy inanimate objects for no reason unless he’s exploding. He goes after life. So he either shattered it via collateral damage or he booshed it away. either way he should scale.
  3. “It just says steppenwolf survived, he could literally have gotten one shot”. The magazine quote reads “Steppenwolf survived a battle with doomsday. That should tell you how strong he is.” It is incredibly disingenuous to say he got one shot as the quote was intended to show that steppenwolf was formidable and not just a descriptive text of a past event. The only feat that doomsday has is the moon shattering feat leading us to believe “that should tell you how strong he is” is in reference to that. Even the literal meaning for the word “battle” does not support being one shot but can be described as a sustained struggle.
  4. “It’s far higher than anything else in the verse.” That’s just blatantly wrong as this thread will show.
  5. “He didn’t destroy it he just split it”. This is false, as we get to see a 3D view of it here, it’s clearly destroyed and all over the place. Even the INverse krypton astrology that humans were able to decode from the scout-ship says it’s been destroyed and exists and a cloud of debris implying parts of it has been pulverised.
  6. "It says he has nigh immortality". that's clearly in reference to his longevity as he has been around for thousands of years. As we see in JL he doesn't have region and can still die if enough damage is inflicted.
  7. It says lex works with steppenwolf in the movie”. This doesn’t contradict anything in the snydercut. In the opening scene we literally see that lex luthor has made in contact with steppenwolf. You can’t prove lex wasn’t working with him as their conversation was off screened. With lex saying at the end of bvs “The God is dead and they’ve heard it and they’re coming”, implying future plans have been shared. Him working with apokolips also isn’t unheard of and was supposed to be explored further in the future movies as the story boards suggest.
Again this is just supporting evidence and does NOT NEED to stand on its own. Entirely dismissing this issue when it matches the “world destroying” interpretation that Zack has of the bvs doomsday should not be taken lightly and needs a ponderous amount of evidence and argumentation to prove otherwise.
2. That's still a problem, was it caused as a side affect of Doomsday and Steppenwolf clashing a thousand times? Was it caused by Doomsday growing exponentionally stronger until he performed the feat as a result of absorbing so much energy?
3. It's less "Steppenwolf got oneshot" and "maybe Doomsday just got stronger"
5. No, Doomsday did not destroy the moon by overcoming the planet's gravitational binding energy, not only are you using a scan where barely anything is visible, but even in that scan, we can still see a giant chunk of the moon in tact. Earlier in the movie we can see the moon is still in two giant massive chunks (in two separate scenes)
And for that last part, it's a special features add on, and falls completely flat when you realize this isn't an actual recounting of what Krypton was like, just an in-universe human made hypothesis crafted from scrapped together information of what they could understand of the scout ship in-universe

1. It's never even stated compress the words used are "made dense" and "compact", which feeds the interpretation above of adding mass without increasing size, thus increasing density as well density.
Ok but the World Engine is phrased as "compacting" the core, which heavily implies physically crushing an object until it is smaller and denser
 
Cool. Looks good. But there's one problem. Snyder, as I remember, called his superman more down to earth, and because of this, HIS superman would not be able to lift the continent. And it seems to me like speculation to say that a character who focuses on physical strength can destroy the planet, but cannot raise the island.
 
Add timestamps


2. That's still a problem, was it caused as a side affect of Doomsday and Steppenwolf clashing a thousand times? Was it caused by Doomsday growing exponentionally stronger until he performed the feat as a result of absorbing so much energy?
3. It's less "Steppenwolf got oneshot" and "maybe Doomsday just got stronger"
5. No, Doomsday did not destroy the moon by overcoming the planet's gravitational binding energy, not only are you using a scan where barely anything is visible, but even in that scan, we can still see a giant chunk of the moon in tact. Earlier in the movie we can see the moon is still in two giant massive chunks (in two separate scenes)
And for that last part, it's a special features add on, and falls completely flat when you realize this isn't an actual recounting of what Krypton was like, just an in-universe human made hypothesis crafted from scrapped together information of what they could understand of the scout ship in-universe
As I said before it’s just supporting evidence and doesn’t need to stand on its own. The reason it’s there is to show that these characters can potentially reach these levels.
Ok but the World Engine is phrased as "compacting" the core, which heavily implies physically crushing an object until it is smaller and denser
I literally explain why that interpretation is impossible and doesn’t work.

As we see from krypton’s explosion that was confirmed to be a neutron star, do you realize how tiny you would have to shrink the core for it to become a neutron star? Yet the core is still normal sized.

Zod’s vision of the engineered earth shows the buildings structures are still more less intact. They would have completely lost their structure if the earth was shrinking in size.

It’s talking about how adding mass to it made it dense.

Along with the other reasons I gave in the op this interpretation is wrong. And even if it was right it wouldn’t matter based on how it’s working by directly increasing the earths gravity.
 
Cool. Looks good. But there's one problem. Snyder, as I remember, called his superman more down to earth, and because of this, HIS superman would not be able to lift the continent. And it seems to me like speculation to say that a character who focuses on physical strength can destroy the planet, but cannot raise the island.
He made those statements in 2013 (iirc) when he was still figuring out how strong he wanted his characters. I brought statements from this decade that clearly show he’s changed his mind on that stance.

This is also a false equivalency as that’s lifting strength and not ap.

Again doomsday wasn’t punching the planet away it’s confirmed he would do it via explosion.
 
The Enchantress scaling is pretty solid based on what's provided, but what was the evidence for her superweapon being High 6-A? I don't remember the exact statements and the profile has no sources.
Stated she would cover the earth in darkness, grinding their cities and mountains into dust, wiping them out and destroying the entire world.

Textbook surface wiping.

we get to see a little bit of it here:


Neutral on Doomsday's world-destroying statement for now.

Your World Engine calc would need to be put in a blog post and accepted to see if it checks out mathematically.
Sure.
I can see Mother Box scaling via Desaad's statement, and agree that the JL dying to Matter Manipulation doesn't disqualify them from scaling.
Wonderful
Darkseid being the strongest villain also seems straightforward.
Great I’m gonna put you down as agree. Thanks for reading all this, ik it’s very long.
 
Cool. Looks good. But there's one problem. Snyder, as I remember, called his superman more down to earth, and because of this, HIS superman would not be able to lift the continent. And it seems to me like speculation to say that a character who focuses on physical strength can destroy the planet, but cannot raise the island.
1. Lifting strength and Attack Potency aren't the same whatsoever. Superman can be Class M and still be Planet level and above.

2. The primary canon would take precedent over WoG in the face of contradiction, not the other way around.

Anyways, skimming over this, I think High 6-A for Enchantress and Doomsday's statement is fine. Unsure of it scaling to Superman for now, so neutral on that end.
 
You can post your calculations here:

Sure thing give me a second.
Also after some digging I agree with Doomsday's statement being High 6-A.
Great.
1. Lifting strength and Attack Potency aren't the same whatsoever. Superman can be Class M and still be Planet level and above.

2. The primary canon would take precedent over WoG in the face of contradiction, not the other way around.
Thank you
Anyways, skimming over this, I think High 6-A for Enchantress and Doomsday's statement is fine. Unsure of it scaling to Superman for now, so neutral on that end.
I think it’s consistent.

Enchantress is stated to be below Uxas and the Old Gods. Uxas is stated comparable to steppenwolf and darkseid meaning they should all be in the same tier.

Watching the fight ww and doomsday only hit doomsday about 6 times in total yet they charged him up so much that he’d blow up the world. It’s confirmed his explosions are him releasing the energy he’s absorbed.

Please take a look at the rest of the stuff
 
As I said before it’s just supporting evidence and doesn’t need to stand on its own. The reason it’s there is to show that these characters can potentially reach these levels.
Yeah but the feat would be High 6-A, not Moon level as your original post is heavily defending

I literally explain why that interpretation is impossible and doesn’t work.

As we see from krypton’s explosion that was confirmed to be a neutron star, do you realize how tiny you would have to shrink the core for it to become a neutron star? Yet the core is still normal sized.

Zod’s vision of the engineered earth shows the buildings structures are still more less intact. They would have completely lost their structure if the earth was shrinking in size.

It’s talking about how adding mass to it made it dense.

Along with the other reasons I gave in the op this interpretation is wrong. And even if it was right it wouldn’t matter based on how it’s working by directly increasing the earths gravity.
Yeah, but compacting by definition, is crushing or putting force on an object until it is either densely compressed. So it is describing the World Engine as crushing Earth until it becomes an ideal planet like Krypton

It's just a weak piece of evidence and contradicts your argument, as I have no real problem with your World Engine proposal
 
Yeah but the feat would be High 6-A, not Moon level as your original post is heavily defending
So why didn’t it put itself back together? Especially considering krypton’s ridiculous gravitational pull.
Yeah, but compacting by definition, is crushing or putting force on an object until it is either densely compressed.
Compact just means dense. Compacting just means making something dense
So it is describing the World Engine as crushing Earth until it becomes an ideal planet like Krypton
Again, WITH context it’s not crushing the earth physically FRA. If you keep packing matter into a finite space you will eventually be compacting it and make it dense. That’s what the WE is doing.
It's just a weak piece of evidence and contradicts your argument, as I have no real problem with your World Engine proposal
Cool
 
Last edited:
So why didn’t it put itself back together? Especially considering krypton’s ridiculous gravitational pull.
Idk, Krypton's gravity could also have been preventing it from reforming by increasing the damage by pulling away part of the moon. The destruction is higher than a baseline moon split, but I still wouldn't say on the level of destroying it's 29.6 Exaton of tnt GBE
Compact just means dense. Compacting just means making something dense
Yes but the verb compacting specifically means crushing or putting pressure on an object
 
Anyways, skimming over this, I think High 6-A for Enchantress and Doomsday's statement is fine. Unsure of it scaling to Superman for now, so neutral on that end.
Doomsday would e definitely scale to Superman and the other top tiers

Diana does better against the monster then Superman does and Steppenwolf is stated as being superior to Doomsdsy by Diana in the Snyder cut (which Flash made canon)

There’s also the fact that Uxas (who could only be fought by the Old Gods) Is on par with Doomsday as per Snyder’s WOG so this upgrades a lot of characters. Enchantress im kinda weird about though since it’s a storm calc and she’s demonstrably far weaker physically then her spells
 
Doomsday would e definitely scale to Superman and the other top tiers

Diana does better against the monster then Superman does and Steppenwolf is stated as being superior to Doomsdsy by Diana in the Snyder cut (which Flash made canon)
the continuity is still weird, since the snyderverse has its own key it’s not even necessary to argue this but yeah. WW says steppenwolf is more powerful than doomsday.
There’s also the fact that Uxas (who could only be fought by the Old Gods) Is on par with Doomsday as per Snyder’s WOG so this upgrades a lot of characters. Enchantress im kinda weird about though since it’s a storm calc and she’s demonstrably far weaker physically then her spells
Iirc, she never actually does anything physical in the form that’s high 6A. And even if she did I don’t think it’d matter. Doctor fate was also significantly physically far weaker than his spells, and the statement implies uxas is more powerful than anything she’s capable of.

It’s also not the storm calc that’s being referenced, it’s the world destroying, humanity ending statements that I’m using. The storm can just be supporting evidence.
 
Did I understand correctly that the gravity that crushes skyscrapers and cars in 0.0001 seconds into a sheet of paper to a depth of many meters in the film is the DEFAULT gravity of Krypton?

I remember Flash throwing himself at the Kryptonians in his movie. On their planet they are even capable of making superhuman jumps as I remember.
 
Did I understand correctly that the gravity that crushes skyscrapers and cars in 0.0001 seconds into a sheet of paper to a depth of many meters in the film is the DEFAULT gravity of Krypton?
Although that’s possible with some of the statements in the novel, that’s NOT what’s being argued here. 5gs is just enough for organs to start getting crushed
 
the continuity is still weird, since the snyderverse has its own key it’s not even necessary to argue this but yeah. WW says steppenwolf is more powerful than doomsday.
That I should change in a CRT when I get time, but yeah Steppenwolf is > Doomsday easily
Iirc, she never actually does anything physical in the form that’s high 6A. And even if she did I don’t think it’d matter. Doctor fate was also significantly physically far weaker than his spells, and the statement implies uxas is more powerful than anything she’s capable of.
She does, she battles against the SS and is physically harmed by them while she’s working the storm/machine to destroy people.
It’s also not the storm calc that’s being referenced, it’s the world destroying, humanity ending statements that I’m using. The storm can just be supporting evidence.
Tbh I think the world ending is very clearly in reference to the larger environmental effects of her magic, it’s the crux of her plan in the film.
Although that’s possible with some of the statements in the novel, that’s NOT what’s being argued here. 5gs is just enough for organs to start getting crushed
Might be an idea to drop those statements in the chat for ease of argumentation, especially for justifying the end seen here
 
It's a Scarlet Witch situation where she's physically nothing special but has very powerful Magic
Yeah that’s basically my interpretation here too, I do think Uxas and co could still scale to her spells because of the evidence.

I’d also note something else, Atlan’s magic created Antarctica to bury Necrus as detailed here. Unsure of if there’s anyway to scale it to hos physicals but it’s consistent with the stuff detailed above.

I’d also note Atlan is weaker than Uxas since he was involved in the first Apokalips Invasion and did much less damage to him than the Old Gods did. Considering Uxas is on par with Doomsday a lot of people get scaling to him pretty easily and it lines up with Aquaman fighting but consistently losing to Steppenwolf
 
That I should change in a CRT when I get time, but yeah Steppenwolf is > Doomsday easily
Feel like there’s no need as there’s blatant WoG contradictory and we’ve already established a separate key.
She does, she battles against the SS and is physically harmed by them while she’s working the storm/machine to destroy people.
No she depowers down to the fodder form before she fights them as she was using her true power to power the machine:
Tbh I think the world ending is very clearly in reference to the larger environmental effects of her magic, it’s the crux of her plan in the film.
No if u look above in the chat, I have statements from the novel saying it would turn the cities and mountains into dust. It’s still surface wiping.
Might be an idea to drop those statements in the chat for ease of argumentation, especially for justifying the end seen here
I did but imma edit them into the op.
 
Last edited:
While it looks fine at glance, but what bothers me is that the calc is very barebones of any sourced information
 
While it looks fine at glance, but what bothers me is that the calc is very barebones of any sourced information
all the sources can be found in the op of the thread but since this is becoming an issue, I will just edit them into the calc blog. Speaking of the OP, do you agree with the scaling argued in the thread?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top