Small Acausality and Intangibility Example Revision

[Deceived3596]

Just like the previous threads I've made, i'm continuing on with revising our examples provided on some of our power and abilities pages, which in this case would be our Acausality and Intangibility pages. I've removed the bad examples that have no scans, bad explanations or a combination of the two.

Here's the blog which contains the revised pages (ignore the rest, as they aren't done yet), and here's the Acasuality and Intangibility pages so y'all can cross-reference everything. If you have better examples than the one's I've added then please tell me and i'll change them out with those new examples.

Voting:

Agree - @LephyrTheRevanchist, @Damage3245, @Emirp sumitpo

Disagree -

Neutral -

 

[Shmooply]

sex
I agree, will try to find any more examples for Acausality since it's sad that there's such a small amount.

 

[Noneless21]

this and this for more example of type 2 Acausality

Edit: Just realized I opened the wrong link, L

I agree to this then

 

[Deceived3596]

Bump

 

[Deceived3596]

Bump

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

Dang, I missed this hard. But yeah, looking good.

 

[ImmortalDread]

You did not add any examples in the small size section

 

[LephyrTheRevanchist]

You did not add any examples in the small size section

ignore the rest, as they aren't done yet

 

[ImmortalDread]

It was confusing at the beginning but thank you.

@Deceived3596 You only added better examples, correct? Or did you adjust the definitions as well?

 

[Deceived3596]

@Deceived3596 You only added better examples, correct? Or did you adjust the definitions as well?

I've only added better examples, didn't change anything else.

 

[ImmortalDread]

I've only added better examples, didn't change anything else.

Then I agree, sure.

 

[Deceived3596]

Bump

 

[Deceived3596]

Bump

 

[RaveeCPN]

I Agree- Although my opinion doesn't matter much

 

[Deceived3596]

Bump

 

[ImmortalDread]

Dang, I missed this hard. But yeah, looking good.

Mind ping for further staff input.?

 

[Deceived3596]

Bump

 

[Damage3245]

Both look fine.

 

[Deceived3596]

Well since these are small changes (only changing the examples) I don't believe I need three mods with evaluation rights to comment on and approve of my thread, especially when one of the people who approve of my changes is an Administrator, and since the needed allot of time has also passed, I believe it's allowed to be added to the pages without trouble.

Both look fine.

Can you unlock both the Intang and Acausality pages?

 

[Reiner04]

I disagree, cope.

 

[Samael_010]

I dont think Overvoid is type 11 large size now

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

Looks good. I propose we use Rebirth Reverse Flash as an example for Acausalty Type 1, since he's a pretty famous example

 

[Deceived3596]

Looks good. I propose we use Rebirth Reverse Flash as an example for Acausalty Type 1, since he's a pretty famous example

I checked his profile and he doesn't have Acausality on it.

There's Acausality on his Post-Crisis version but it has zero explanation and scans.

 

[Samael_010]

I think dr manhattan would be good for type 3 acasuality example its easy to find in the profile and the scan is pretty blatant and clear

 

[DaMonkeMan]

Feels like a Staff Discussion thread but that's just me.

 

[Emirp sumitpo]

I checked his profile and he doesn't have Acausality on it.

There's Acausality on his Post-Crisis version but it has zero explanation and scans.

Oof nvm then

 

[Damage3245]

Changes have been made so closing the thread.

 

[Antvasima]

Why were more famous examples that have Intangibility as a primary signature ability, such as Kitty Pryde, The Vision, and the One Piece logia characters removed?

For example, when somebody think of Spawn, this is not exactly the first most distinctive signature ability somebody thinks of.

Also, policy page revision threads should always be posted in our staff forum and be evaluated by administrators.

It seems best to revert these changes for the time being.

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Intangibility?curid=29089&diff=8017594&oldid=8017574

 

[Antvasima]

These changes seem far more reasonable, but why was The Doctor replaced with The Beyonder?

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Acausality?curid=11479&diff=8017591&oldid=8017572

 

[Oliver_de_jesus]

Same thought, Doctor who is maybe the verse with the most temporary things that exists and Zangreus's explanation is the most detailed for that type 2

 

[Deceived3596]

I'll address your points later, I just got back from the dentist.

 

[Antvasima]

I still think that we should replace The Beyonder with The Doctor by reverting that change.

 

[Deceived3596]

I don't believe we should, but I'll explain in more depth when I'm feeling better, I got a cold yesterday so I'm not feeling the greatest rn.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. No problem. I hope that you get well soon.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Or simply add it since there is no real limits to adding examples.

 

[Antvasima]

I suppose that might be an idea as well, but The Beyonder may be an unintuitive example.

 

[DaMonkeMan]

Bump?

 

[Antvasima]

These changes seem far more reasonable, but why was The Doctor replaced with The Beyonder?

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Acausality?curid=11479&diff=8017591&oldid=8017572

Same thought, Doctor who is maybe the verse with the most temporary things that exists and Zangreus's explanation is the most detailed for that type 2

I still think that we should replace The Beyonder with The Doctor by reverting that change.

Or simply add it since there is no real limits to adding examples.

I suppose that might be an idea as well, but The Beyonder may be an unintuitive example.

@Deceived3596 @Damage3245 @LephyrTheRevanchist @Emirp sumitpo

Your further input would be appreciated here. Also, changes to our instruction pages should always be requested in our staff forum to start with.

 

[ImmortalDread]

Would you like to move it to staff board if you don't mind? Thank you!

 

[Antvasima]

I have done so now.