Slight modification to surtur destroying asgard

[DmarcvelCOO]

https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/User_blog:Darkanine/MCU:_Destroying_Asgard

Please I think I have a better method for calculating the upper part Asgard in the above calc.

Instead of measuring it as a cone, why not a cylinder which has two bases of different area

Therefore

Volume=((¤Ç┬╣r┬▓)+(¤Ç┬▓r┬▓))/2├ùh

Where

┬╣r is radius of top base

┬▓r is radius of bottom base

h is height

Using this I got a volume of 14km┬│ instead of 10km┬│ stated in the calc for he whole of asgard

Pls tell me what u think of this

 

[DmarcvelCOO]

Bump

 

[Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan]

Agreed. However, density of granite is 2650 kg/m^3. So it'll be 3.71e+13 kilograms. As Darkanine said, 96 275.21 m/s. Kinetic energy would be still Country level, so I don't think it matters much.

 

[Amelia_Lonelyheart]

Upon looking back at the image, I think a cone is more logical here as well.

 

[DmarcvelCOO]

Agreed. However, density of granite is 2650 kg/m^3. So it'll be 3.71e+13 kilograms. As Darkanine said, 96 275.21 m/s. Kinetic energy would be still Country level, so I don't think it matters much.

It still should be changed because of he following scenario

In a versus battle surtur might loose because this value is lower than the oponents value meanwhile it would be higher if it was modified accurately

 

[Antvasima]

Upon looking back at the image, I think a cone is more logical here as well.

Do you mean a cylinder or a cone? Given the "as well" phrasing, it seems uncertain.

 

[Spinosaurus75DinosaurFan]

bump