- 26,160
- 3,652
I'll admit I didn't read every comment in here, so my bad for potential repetition.
I feel like the abstract existence part should just go on the abstract existence page since it's not limited to skill. Being the embody ment of anything does not mean that you will absolutely incorporate something that matches that from another verse. Exemple given before was death, though it applies to pretty much everything.
The rest of this shouldn't really be rules though, on my opinion.
For skill letting someone beat a X40 or however much stronger enemy... context can matter for it. Even now in MCU we have the profiles note that the Asgardian's blades can stab tier 6s and win, so if a simple to predict tier 6 character fought someone with such a blade they could win, and it is a feat of skill to win against someone who kills you with any attack whether it's blocked or not.
For speed its a lot more iffy, though you may argue something for analytical prediction there. If you know where an enemy is moving, and they are for some reason forced or dumb enough to move there regardless, you can prepare your weapon there to stab them when they pass there. But it would need a lot of justifying.
Supernatural abilities can have someone being "skilled" in them - being a skilled magician is possible - but arguing who is better is like comparing apples and oranges, since each verse makes up its mechanics for that.
For superpower through skill (potentially even something like Hamon being done through a specific breathing), it's a skill feat in-verse and may be used as an argument for an in-verse fight, but it is unquantifiable for battles with other verses.
I feel like the abstract existence part should just go on the abstract existence page since it's not limited to skill. Being the embody ment of anything does not mean that you will absolutely incorporate something that matches that from another verse. Exemple given before was death, though it applies to pretty much everything.
The rest of this shouldn't really be rules though, on my opinion.
For skill letting someone beat a X40 or however much stronger enemy... context can matter for it. Even now in MCU we have the profiles note that the Asgardian's blades can stab tier 6s and win, so if a simple to predict tier 6 character fought someone with such a blade they could win, and it is a feat of skill to win against someone who kills you with any attack whether it's blocked or not.
For speed its a lot more iffy, though you may argue something for analytical prediction there. If you know where an enemy is moving, and they are for some reason forced or dumb enough to move there regardless, you can prepare your weapon there to stab them when they pass there. But it would need a lot of justifying.
Supernatural abilities can have someone being "skilled" in them - being a skilled magician is possible - but arguing who is better is like comparing apples and oranges, since each verse makes up its mechanics for that.
For superpower through skill (potentially even something like Hamon being done through a specific breathing), it's a skill feat in-verse and may be used as an argument for an in-verse fight, but it is unquantifiable for battles with other verses.