• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

SCP-682 vs Iihiko Shishime

Status
Not open for further replies.
This ends in inconclusive. Iihiko can't actually kill 682 and resists anything 682 can do to him.
 
Counted.
 
Counted.
 
Bump.
 
Why does this thread even exist? It's about as useless as 90% of Thunder McQueen matches.
 
My "whack" was actually a vote for Inconclusive that just degenerated into a single word. I had the thought of 682 endlessly whacking at Iihiko due to regen and Iihiko's weird hax, but then this just became "whack".

So yeah, Inconclusive.
 
Saikou The Lewd King said:
My "whack" was actually a vote for Inconclusive that just degenerated into a single word. I had the thought of 682 endlessly whacking at Iihiko due to regen and Iihiko's weird hax, but then this just became "whack".
So yeah, Inconclusive.
5 Inconc.

With 1 word/joke you started a revolution...geez, that's some heavy badassery.
 
Sir Ovens said:
Why does this thread even exist? It's about as useless as 90% of Thunder McQueen matches.
I thought there'd be arguments about 1-B immortality, whether Irreversible Destruction would actually stop 682's low-godly, if 682 had any hax that could force recognition, if 682's adaptation would be able to eventually copy Irreversible Destruction... Instead the thread's just whack.
 
Irreversible Destruction might bypass regen if we stretch it but not the immortalities
 
WeeklyBattles said:
This is extended canon 682, it has mid-godly not Low-godly
Didn't 682 only have its body erased from existence by 3090? Why does it get mid-godly and not low-godly?
 
Well, that's the end of grace. This can be added.
 
(can one of the admins that commented add it to the profiles?)
 
Come on Agnaa, it's only been 6 days since grace ended, it's still too soon for anyone to bother.

Just pm someone privately. Someone who's active rn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top