- 12,300
- 11,259
I vote the Potato Chip Taker/Eater FRA
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Not at all, Light can easily right his name before the shockwaves hits him.
I don't understand the issue here, you made their speed equal. He can react to it just fine.
Speed Equal means watching someone who's equal to you, run a distance of 50 meters. For average humans, such a distance would take 8 seconds. Since Light is equal to Saitama in speed, the average punch speed of a boxer is 11.5 m/s, which is a timeframe of around 4.3 seconds. Should be enough time to write down his name.
The shockwave of a punch would travel slower than the actual punch itself, but not by a large amount in fiction. Also even though I say four seconds, I don't actually mean four seconds, but what Saitama and Light would perceive as four seconds.
This is still inconclusive, since Light will die from Saitama's attack and Saitama will die 40 seconds later. Light can't write faster than Saitama can throw a punch, and he can't stop his shockwave attack even if he kills him instantly. Though I don't think he'll have anytime to write anything other than Saitama's name.
Speed Equalization rules: "The combat speed of that faster character is assumed to be equalized to the combat speed of the slower character. Every other speed the faster character has is reduced by the same multiplier. This includes the speed of any attacks, projectiles, reactions, perception, flight etc."
Saitama's attack speed is reduced as well in this situation. Since all of Saitama's speed values are equal to each other, there will be no difference in their speed, the speeds of Saitama's attacks can be reacted to by Light in this situation. This would only changes if Saitama's combat speed was slower than his attack speed.
Equalized speed iirc.Didn't Saitama's shockwaves cover a whole desert in like, half a second?
Equalized speed, Saitama's shockwaves are not faster than his own combat speed. His speed all around is one simple rating.
Shockwaves do not instantly teleport, so Light can write a name down before it reaches him. Since the wind coming from Saitama's punch isn't faster than his own combat speed.In real life it'd actually be slower, but I won't bring that up as this is fiction.
But Saitama doesn't have higher attack speed with shockwaves, so Light can react and write Saitama's name down before dying to the shockwave of a punch. So yes, I'm certain this is an inconclusive. What laws of physics, speed equalization means his air pressure has been slowed down as well.
I'm sorry but that isn't how this works here. Also Relativistic+ wind pressure don't exist in reality, such energy would turn the air into plasma before moving at such speeds. But regardless, his attack speed is lowered, all of his attacks are lowered. What you're saying is just incorrect with how this wiki works.
I know some people dislike speed equalization in general, but those are the rules.
Well, you know the rule, if the Death Note is destroyed, everyone who touched it dies tooWould the death note work if its vaporized actually? I'd assume so
You know that you can vote on your own thread right?2 more until grace
This scenario is where saitama punches, and Light writes. the shock wave is going to move at the same speed as saitama. no matter what. its going to take quicker for light to write the word 'saitama' than it is Saitama to throw a serious punch, as, dispite being bloodlusted he's still going to make an overdramatic pullback and throw for his punch, which is more than enough time for light to write a single word. saitama gets his name written, throws his punch nigh instantly after word due to his pullback and punch, light gets annihlated. that is the only scenario that can happen here.The point of a vs discussion is to determine who the winner of a fight would be. To do so, it's important to get a better understanding of abilities, fighters and how the fight would happen. The rules and conditions are only supposed to make the discussion easier and get everyone on the same page. In this case, I think the conditions themselves are being at the center of attention because everyone imagines a different type of a fight.
We know what abilities of both fighters are. We know who would win in what scenario. We just don't know which scenario we are even discussing.
Is this a scenario where Saitama can punch and instantly win? Or is this a scenario specifically made to allow Light to write down Saitama's name?
My understanding of the rules is that fighters keep their abilities, and the purpose of speed equalization is simply to allow the other fighter to react. Not that the faster character loses abilities because of it. For example, if someone can "fly" by kicking the air really fast, they don't lose that ability just because the speed is equalized.
I know that this contradicts the rules of how the power works, but I thought we are supposed to ignore contradictions so that both fighters can have all their abilities.
since when? bruhhhYou know that you can vote on your own thread right?
Believe the rule comes from heresince when? bruhhh
not really, the op made the match, that doesn't mean they have no opinion on it. if theres enough evidence on one side, or there simply isn't enough traction to the thread, the OP can simply vote to either get the thread done with, or simply vote because the logic seems reasonable.i think its kinda scummy personally, I feel like the OP should be neutral
The OP can start neutral but everyone’s gonna have their opinion in a VS match. So as long as they have concrete evidence or arguments in the thread have swayed them, their should be no reason why they too can’t express their opinioni think its kinda scummy personally, I feel like the OP should be neutral
the shockwave has to move towards light. its not gonna just appear on him and make him explode, he has more than enough time to write the name down, and then explodeI don't believe Light reacting to a serious punch is pertinent due to it's range? I recall the shockwave spanning o'er a large portion of the planet's surface.
That isn't a victory for Light, that's inconclusive as he also perishes?the shockwave has to move towards light. its not gonna just appear on him and make him explode, he has more than enough time to write the name down, and then explode
technically im pretty sure its a mismatch since neither have a wincon, as they both die.That isn't a victory for Light, that's inconclusive as he also perishes?
Not saying they can't express their opinion what? I just don't think they should vote so they don't pressure people into FRA training or end up being biased towards a character. It'd probably be fine if its later in a thread or if everyone agrees on an InconThe OP can start neutral but everyone’s gonna have their opinion in a VS match. So as long as they have concrete evidence or arguments in the thread have swayed them, their should be no reason why they too can’t express their opinion
Its a stalemate, their wincons are killing each other which they both dotechnically im pretty sure its a mismatch since neither have a wincon, as they both die.
but they both die. neither are win cons since they dont win, they die.Its a stalemate, their wincons are killing each other which they both do
Its a stalemate, their wincons are killing each other which they both do
its inconclusive.but they both die. which isn't a win con since they dont win, they die.
inconclusive is if both have valid wincons but neither can win.its inconclusive.
In the english language inconclusive and draw mean different things. Inconclusive here is used for draws and toss ups or if votes are extremely tiedIs there a difference between inconclusive and a conclusive draw?
Saitama's wincon is his AP and shockwavesinconclusive is if both have valid wincons but neither can win.
neither have win cons. its a mismatch
Saitama dies no matter what after he does this.Saitama's wincon is his AP and shockwaves
Light's wincon is writing Saitama's name to give him a heart attack
I meant here, is there a way to make a distinction? I think it's pretty important whether a discussion ended and everyone agreeing it's a draw, or everyone agreeing that we don't have enough information.In the english language inconclusive and draw mean different things. Inconclusive here is used for draws and toss ups or if votes are extremely tied
no. they both die directly after their supposed wincons.I meant here, is there a way to make a distinction? I think it's pretty important whether a discussion ended everyone agreeing it's a draw, or everyone agreeing that we don't have enough information.
pretty sure the person who dies first loses, regardless of if the other dies afterwards.no. they both die directly after their supposed wincons.