- 366
- 105
pretty sure my argument on this topic haven't been debunked
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
On this site with some users, even StS CRTs aren't about StS.is this even about saint seiya anymore
users will make a upgrade thread about some random verse from 2012 and then try to apply Homestuck argsOn this site with some users, even StS CRTs aren't about StS.
We all know that it's not about Dragon Ball, it's about their standards that are distorted and trying to take it further.This whole thread has been DB fans crying and debunking low 1-C DBS.
=/ Huh what?Most of the people who have commented here are not Dragon Ball fans, i don't know why this absurd hatred of yours for DB fans, being that the only mistake is your beliefs that are wrong and some people are saying that this is not right
The 3 major opponents of this thread have DB avatars, 2 of them have active DB upgrade threads.We all know that it's not about Dragon Ball, it's about their standards that are distorted and trying to take it further.
Most of the people who have commented here are not Dragon Ball fans, i don't know why this absurd hatred of yours for DB fans, being that the only mistake is your beliefs that are wrong and some people are saying that this is not right
But if this continues, your path here will certainly be short.
dude stop. does it matter if they are db fans? you used to have an ssj4 avatar and were planning on a low 1-C u7 thread.The 3 major opponents of this thread have DB avatars, 2 of them have active DB upgrade threads.
Who are you trying to fool?
They are insulting us for crying, when we are only pointing out mistakes.dude stop. does it matter if they are db fans? you used to have an ssj4 avatar and were planning on a low 1-C u7 thread.
No more accusations and the same goes for @LuffyRuffy46307
Dude stop mini modding please, everyone but Luffy knows I’m one of the sites biggest DB fans.dude stop. does it matter if they are db fans? you used to have an ssj4 avatar and were planning on a low 1-C u7 thread.
No more accusations and the same goes for @LuffyRuffy46307
I'm literally trying to prevent derailing in order to prevent clutter so the CRT can be evaluated and yes thats precisely my pointDude stop mini modding please, everyone but Luffy knows I’m one of the sites biggest DB fans.
Using false equivalency’s won’t get you anywhere. Showing the flaws in the Logic presented isn’t involved with DB in any way.no since 2-A structures have parallel timelines, perpendicular temporal axes are beyond tier 2's scope.
NoThis whole thread has been DB fans crying and debunking low 1-C DBS.
Care to show where the false equivalency is?Using false equivalency’s won’t get you anywhere. Showing the flaws in the Logic presented isn’t involved with DB in any way.
No
Like I said db didn't needed to prove that since it already had a higher time axis proven in the narrative which contains lesser time axis
Also please stop bringing db into this and also to others stop derailing the crt is already 4 pages long
No
Like I said db didn't needed to prove that since it already had a higher time axis proven in the narrative which contains lesser time axis
Also please stop bringing db into this and also to others stop derailing the crt is already 4 pages long
Read again higher temporal axis contains lesser temporal dimension hence why it is automatically orthogonal we didn't needed to prove that the timeline is orthogonal you have to prove either why the time axis in saint seiya are orthogonal or show that the higher time axis contains lower time axis…
That quote literally debunks your argument, it literally says orthogonality is a requirement which is literally what the whole DB argument aims to prove in a round about way.
The only reason why DB has been brought up is because the arguments are using the same logic so it’s being used as an analogy to help the DB supporters who are opposing this thread understand the argument they’re debating against.
You keep saying “it’s different” but it actually isn’t. The argument in the OP has a direct statement that satisfies the criteria, DB didn’t/doesn’t, hence why the blog used for DB is so long. But this CRT aims to prove StS follows the same underlying logic BUT HAS DIRECT STATEMENTS of having multiple temporal axes.
I did read it hence my comment.Read again higher temporal axis contains lesser temporal dimension hence why it is automatically orthogonal we didn't needed to prove that the timeline is orthogonal you have to prove either why the time axis in saint seiya are orthogonal or show that the higher time axis contains lower time axis
We need to summon @Planck69Can we get tier 1 mods like @Qawsedf234 and others?
Ik he was saying that ss case was same as db while it is not since db directly has a higher time axis proven by containing lesser time dimension while he is saying that multiple temporal dimensions are orthogonalproving higher temporal axes is the same as proving orthogonality (since the it cannot be higher if its parallel) as hasty and I already agreed to. What i dont understand is why he thinks the existence of multiple temporal dimensions inherently means they're orthogonal when it could also point towards 2-A
I’m saying the underlying logic is the same.Ik he was saying that ss case was same as db while it is not since db directly has a higher time axis proven by containing lesser time dimension while he is saying that multiple temporal dimensions are orthogonal
I have nothing against orthogonality I am telling you to prove me why are they orthogonal having multiple temporal dimension doesn't mean they are directly orthogonalI’m saying the underlying logic is the same.
if you read the blog its actually more than that which is why I said that the blog does a better job at explaining the higher temporal dimension with an in-verse exampleIk he was saying that ss case was same as db while it is not since db directly has a higher time axis proven by containing lesser time dimension while he is saying that multiple temporal dimensions are orthogonal
Like I said I was explaining db reasoning for qualifyingif you read the blog its actually more than that which is why I said that the blog does a better job at explaining the higher temporal dimension with an in-verse example
Is this a threat, btw?But if this continues, your path here will certainly be short.
thats just talking about the 8th sense. Those that have it can perceive the entire multiverseI definitely agree with Low 1-C, considering the FAQ makes it clear that multiple temporal axes by default are enough but not easy for any series to adapt. Higher or lower dimensions are just VS Battles Wiki wording for any time axis aside from the existing one. It doesn't mean anything.
Regarding multiple timelines, I don't think we can assume each timeliness of the future will have its own axis, considering that it's directly stated that the future is an amalgamation of several alternate timelines, not that all of them have their own time axis. Only the past and future, which seem to be treated as different worlds, have separate time axes.
Coming to the infinite multitude of vector dimensions, I don’t agree with them being temporal dimensions given no evidence of it, though I can see some context (if translation is correct) about them being higher dimensions than normal ones perceived by us. 'One needs to reach the eighth consciousness to perceive them,' but I'm not knowledgeable on the series to state my opinion on it with certainty. Ig I agree with possibly (to make it clear i don't disagree or anything with solid but i just don't know enough about series). Also, about who scales to these spatial dimensions must be derived by virtue of those capable of affecting spatial higher dimensions, not temporal ones, since these aren't temporal.
He threatens me every other thread, I’ve already said I’ve taken dumps more threatening than a guy with a Goku Black AviIs this a threat, btw?
Can you clarify this part? Because In a universe with infinite presents, you'd have infinite of theseRegarding multiple timelines, I don't think we can assume each timeliness of the future will have its own axis, considering that it's directly stated that the future is an amalgamation of several alternate timelines, not that all of them have their own time axis. Only the past and future, which seem to be treated as different worlds, have separate time axes.
He threatens me every other thread, I’ve already said I’ve taken dumps more threatening than a guy with a Goku Black Avi
But whether a given point is the past or future is simply relative to your perspectiveOnly the past and future, which seem to be treated as different worlds, have separate time axes.
I gain nothing from reporting a blue name who’s most common phrase is “agree FRA”.Isn't this RVR worth anyway?
More than one timeline can have one time axis per faq. U gotta have statement regarding them being separate axis, which seems to be only existing for future and present.Can you clarify this part? Because In a universe with infinite presents, you'd have infinite of these
He threatens me every other thread, I’ve already said I’ve taken dumps more threatening than a guy with a Goku Black Avi