Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,238
- 4,062
no since 2-A structures have parallel timelines, perpendicular temporal axes are beyond tier 2's scope.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Saint Seiya High 1-B Upgrade (Manga)
- Thread starter Kaiou1991
- Start date
-
- Tags
- pegasus seiya saint seiya
- Status
- 366
- 105
no, UNLESS those cosmologies have evidence that each timeline or 4D Time-Space exists on a different temporal axis
- 1,967
- 1,664
makes sense. Then the focus should really be on proving that these are higher temporal axes since that would inherently make them perpendicular and thus result in a high 1-B structure
- 366
- 105
we don't even need higher temporal axis
We just need to prove that each axis
Is a different axis
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,238
- 4,062
No, they don't need to be higher. The notion of "higher temporal axis" is more conducive to the idea they are parallel. The focus is on proving they are perpendicular.
- 366
- 105
I think we've done a good job. However nothing will get approved until we get staff on this thread
- 1,967
- 1,664
but didnt we establish that these are essentially the same?
- 1,967
- 1,664
okay that's where I'm lost I have no idea how that'll prove it tbhwe don't even need higher temporal axis
We just need to prove that each axis
Is a different axis
- 366
- 105
let me explain why they are NOT the same
[Key]
A=Spacetime.
B=Infinite ammount of space times.
Imagine a Chess board that has a infinite amount of places.
Let's say that A is a queen and it takes a rook
In chess(IRL) you move the piece above the piece you wanna take; It would be like A transcending another A which would make A 5D
Now let's say the chess board is a universe.
There exists a infinite amount of chess pieces which(are all B) they each occupy a different temporal axis
- 366
- 105
we have; because I already proved that there existed a infinite temporal vector space
- 366
- 105
my arguments are unstoppableNow that the thread has slowed down, I'm going to add the votes.
Let's hope the thread doesn't vanish into the void
- 1,967
- 1,664
That just added to the confusion
- 366
- 105
uuhhhhH
coordinate=separate dimension=higher scaling
infinite ammount of coordinates
Now infinite dimension!
Me high 1-B!
coordinate=separate dimension=higher scaling
infinite ammount of coordinates
Now infinite dimension!
Me high 1-B!
- 366
- 105
my next analogy will be about pizza
- 1,967
- 1,664
okay no please stop, this isnt helpful. Im just asking hasty what he thinks the difference (if any) is between perpendicular time vs higher temporal axis and why they're not the same as we presumably established previously
- 366
- 105
ohhhhhhhhhhh
my bad gang, I thought you like didn't understand at all
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,238
- 4,062
They are the same on the wiki.
- 366
- 105
pretty sure what hatsy is going to say is that
higher temporal axis is if something beings transcended and perpendicular time axis is that there's multiple temporal Vectors
higher temporal axis is if something beings transcended and perpendicular time axis is that there's multiple temporal Vectors
- 1,967
- 1,664
see? thats all I wanted to confirm. so really as I said before we just need to prove that they are either perpendicular or higher since they're the same on the wiki and it makes sense (since parallel ones are explicitly not higher temporal dimensions)
- 1,967
- 1,664
I think you're misunderstanding a bit. multiple spatial vectors (say a R^7 space) is inherently a tier 1 space. However according to the wiki if you have multiple temporal vectors then it doesnt achieve the same result unless you prove they're a higher axes (or perpendicular as hasty and i said are the same)
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,238
- 4,062
The bolded parts are the same.
- 399
- 178
you need to prove that even for spatial vector. Just saying "this universe has 6 spatial dimension" isn't enought
- 1,967
- 1,664
how? thats the part where Im lost. How would multiple temporal dimensions be inherently perpendicular or "higher" than each preceding one?
- 1,967
- 1,664
spatial dimensions are ALWAYS perpendicular to one another there's no exception to this rule
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,238
- 4,062
same way 2D and 3D differ.
- 1,967
- 1,664
nah hasty, that logic only works for spatial dimensions which we know are inherently perpendicular to one another (you can NEVER have a 3-space where 1 spatial dimension is parallel to length for example)
- 399
- 178
if this was the case then most tier 2 would have been tier 1. You need context. In your exaple you assumed that those spatial dimensions were already higher spatial axis.
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,238
- 4,062
The logic is the same for all perpendicular vectors.
- 1,967
- 1,664
no thats just the wiki having standards on what it thinks qualifies as evidence for higher spatial dimensions. Thats not the same as claiming that spatial dimensions are parallel unless proven otherwise or most verses with a 3D universe would be down to 1D. A fourth spatial axis is inherently perpendicular to the 3 we already know
- 1,967
- 1,664
Im pretty sure thats not how the wiki treats them even if I agree with you
- 399
- 178
no, only 3D and most of the time also 4D are assumed to be perpendicular by defoult. For a 5th or/and higher time or spatial axis you need to proove perpendiculatity
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,238
- 4,062
The wiki throws logic out the window in tier 2.
- 1,967
- 1,664
you got that right but we cant really play by our own standards if we wanna get big changes passed
- 1,967
- 1,664
- 366
- 105
tier 2 is so goofy
Hasty12345
Username Only- 5,238
- 4,062
This whole thread has been DB fans crying and debunking low 1-C DBS.
- 366
- 105
is this even about saint seiya anymore
- 1,967
- 1,664
maybe but here's my final thoughts on that:
1.) I do think the dbs blog does a better job at demonstrating a higher temporal flow with the time travel example from the verse
2.) we really oughta stop bringing in another verse. One reason dbs crts were constantly stonewalled was because many people kept bringing up GOW so lets stop that
- Status
Similar threads
- Locked
