• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Saint Seiya Discussion Thread (IV)

no but it could have stemmed from a CRT. Also i did read the verse page. If i had found the answer i wouldnt be asking right? It says G is canon but if thats the case why the canon split?
The works that are canon to each other are literally laid out.

Canon meaning “in the same multiverse” then the timelines are split up according to the CRT.
 
The works that are canon to each other are literally laid out.

Canon meaning “in the same multiverse” then the timelines are split up according to the CRT.
yeah okay after reading everything again I'm even more confused as to why the canons got split when even the sequels to Ep G are listed as canon to the main timeline
 
Ofc it’s not going to make sense if you haven’t read the manga…
I'll get there it cant be helped. look at the verse page there's a shit load of mangas to get through more than any other series I follow. That said i was wondering if I should even bother now that theres a chance ND might decanonize GA/GR
 
Basically, G and the classic are not considered the same universe, but within the same multiverse. They just call it a canon split cos idk
 
So, personal complaint: I don't think Reactive Power Level should be on the Powers and Abilities page as it's only Seiya and Ikki who are expressly noted to have it and both times it's treated as a big thing tied to them specifically.

Seiya gets stronger each time he gets knocked down as well as each time he uses his skills, and Ikki gets stronger each time he's injured or killed.

No other Saint on panel has that, and when Seiya and Ikki do it, it's treated as a big surprise.
 
I'll get there it cant be helped. look at the verse page there's a shit load of mangas to get through more than any other series I follow. That said i was wondering if I should even bother now that theres a chance ND might decanonize GA/GR

I'll get there it cant be helped. look at the verse page there's a shit load of mangas to get through more than any other series I follow. That said i was wondering if I should even bother now that theres a chance ND might decanonize GA/GR
Then don’t read it
 
so he was downplaying the verse? Is that a reason to be banned?
Downplaying? Hardly. She was going for the safest, most narratively consistent interpretation imo backed up by other translators, including wiki translators. Even the usual opposition that disagrees with her CRTs was in favor of a 2-A cosmology based on the scans in question
But hey, if StS Is 1-B it's 1-B. I just hope that when the time comes to make that thread, we won't run into a similar issue but with inflating ratings instead
 
Downplaying? Hardly. She was going for the safest, most narratively consistent interpretation imo backed up by other translators, including wiki translators. Even the usual opposition that disagrees with her CRTs was in favor of a 2-A cosmology based on the scans in question
But hey, if StS Is 1-B it's 1-B. I just hope that when the time comes to make that thread, we won't run into a similar issue but with inflating ratings instead
Low 1-A Saint Seiya coming to a wiki near you
 
Downplaying? Hardly. She was going for the safest, most narratively consistent interpretation imo backed up by other translators, including wiki translators. Even the usual opposition that disagrees with her CRTs was in favor of a 2-A cosmology based on the scans in question
But hey, if StS Is 1-B it's 1-B. I just hope that when the time comes to make that thread, we won't run into a similar issue but with inflating ratings instead
thats kinda messed up. The 2-A rating should've been solidified first with every possible piece of evidence. Upgrades can happen later so thats no reason to ban someone. Thats like saying dbh supporters who pushed for 2-A years ago instead of 1-C should be banned lol
 
thats kinda messed up. The 2-A rating should've been solidified first with every possible piece of evidence. Upgrades can happen later so thats no reason to ban someone
It is what it is, I suppose. I just don't want anyone accusing us of inflating statistics when the 1-B upgrade drops
 
Hasty when his high 1-B arguments dont save him from being one shot by a 9-C kangaroo:

4TDqiIS.jpeg
 
tbh if you're a brazilian who watched anime you're either biased against saint seiya or against dragon ball there's pretty much no middle ground
As a Brazilian who isn't biased against either (I like SS more, but the first DB is peak), I will have to disagree.
 
Back
Top