Rule Violations Reports - 62

[Dragonmasterxyz]

How does anyone make any edits in this wiki if all I get is mod hate. You're really good at de-incentivizing people from doing anything.

Make a CRT to get the changes made. Simple as that. Bambu told you this when he first confronted you. You did them wrong, now you have been told how to do them right. This is dropped now.

 

[ShakeResounding]

I've interacted with him a fair amount, and I can advocate for him actually shaping up and being far better than he was. He's just a kid who was poorly influenced by others that were on this site from what I've seen, and he's definitely cleaned up his act.

If he's brought back, I honestly doubt he'll do something to be banned again.

Bumpo g this thing for the sake of moving past that and in case DDM didn't see it before, here's my opinion on the EarthyBoy situation.

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

Can we please stop arguing back and forth in the RVR thread? It's crap like this that we have had more RVR threads remade last year alone than we did in total between 2015 through 2018. Anyway, I'm going to have to agree with Bambu and DragonMaster here, but seriously. An initial report and maybe a self defense or two is fine, but a constant back and forth flame war shouldn't be on this thread.

Anyway, I know Shake, TheUser, and Mephistus are fine with Earthy coming back, but Zamasu and Ploz both seem against it. But prefer to here from a few others before we do anything.

Edit: I agree with Agnaa, though this was a new month and a new year. And the 1st time, but still. I agree 100% the intervals are too soon/frequent.

 

[Agnaa]

@DDM This is the fourth time in a month EarthyBoy has asked to be unbanned. This request has been declined all other times.

Can you all PLEASE stop indulging his constant stream of requests?

This really is just fishing until someone with poor judgement ends up unbanning him before others can say anything...

 

[Promestein]

I had Zark close this thread, because people are pushing their luck again and the thread is almost certainly gonna go like all the rest did.

If anyone makes a thread like that again, they're getting banned on the spot. I don't care what rules they set on them; obviously, the users that go on those threads will push their luck and try and bend them.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

for how long

 

[Sera_EX]

Yeah, I've said more than once that Waifu threads need to be abolished because people keep pushing. There'ss always that one or two people that posts something completely NSFW.

Though, what about the "Biggest/Smallest Busts for Every Tier" threads? Are those fine?

 

[Antvasima]

We need a new regulation first. We cannot ban everybody who posts a drawing of a woman in a bikini and also need our members to become aware of our policies regarding these issues/where we draw the line.

 

[Sera_EX]

A woman in a bikini isn't an issue (unless it's like a micro bikini). We're talking about those borderline hentai/overly suggestive images.

 

[Promestein]

I have concerns about those threads but it depends on the content.

 

[Antvasima]

Okay. We still need a discussion rule against creating these sort of threads in that case though, and explain that it is because they inevitably eventually go over the line into sexualised drawings of children and the like.

 

[Agnaa]

So far it seems like only the "Post your waifu/husbando" threads have had the line pushed. Other types of threads shouldn't need to be banned unless they get pushed too.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

I got it:

Please do not create picture sharing threads about "waifus" or "husbandos", this is because they often lead from friendly fun about fictional characters they find attractive to sexualized pictures of underage minors and NSFW drawings

 

[Antvasima]

Well, it technically isn't hard to come up with variations on the same theme but with a different title.

 

[DarkGrath]

To what extent should these kinds of threads not be allowed? Should it be exclusive to "waifu/husbando" threads, or is there more that should be included in the discussion rule? It'd be worth setting up a staff discussion about this.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Instead of saying waifu or husbando, just generalize and say picture sharing threads of characters they find attractive

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

The Bust thread also used pictures to try to justify a spot on that tier, i don't know if we should keep that as well

 

[00potato]

"No threads based around sexual content/ sexual image sharing are to be made."

 

[Antvasima]

Blue makes sense to me.

 

[ElixirBlue]

"No threads based around sexual content/ sexual image sharing are to be made."

The word "Waifu" isn't sexual in nature. Sure, that makes me sound like a Weeabo, but the problem is when people take it too far with the children characters and sexual depictions.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Or when they show half naked characters

 

[Sera_EX]

Rather than banning threads, how about we ban highly suggestive or erotic pictures? Simple

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Rather than banning threads, how about we ban highly suggestive or erotic pictures? Simple

We already have, in fact, one of the rules on the last thread was that. But the people didn't listen and posted whatever they wanted

 

[DatOneWeeb]

That seems more reasonable.

 

[Antvasima]

Something like this then?

"Please do not create picture sharing threads featuring characters that you find attractive. This is because they often lead from friendly fun to sexualized drawings of minors and similar."

 

[Agnaa]

Rather than banning threads, how about we ban highly suggestive or erotic pictures? Simple

That's already a thing, but Prome and others have raised concerns (now and in the past) that these threads quickly push the boundary more and more on that rule.

 

[00potato]

The word "Waifu" isn't sexual in nature. Sure, that makes me sound like a Weeabo, but the problem is when people take it too far with the children characters and sexual depictions.

The thread, by its very nature invited sexual content though. Sharing "Waifu." Images is obviously going to be sexual by it's nature as it revolves around hot anime women.

 

[Sera_EX]

Then we add not to create threads that end up prone to having such pictures posted.

 

[I'm_Blue_daba_dee_daba_die]

Something like this then?
"Please do not create picture sharing threads featuring characters that you find attractive. This is because they often lead from friendly fun to sexualized drawings of minors and similar."

This seems fine

 

[ElixirBlue]

The word "Waifu" isn't sexual in nature. Sure, that makes me sound like a Weeabo, but the problem is when people take it too far with the children characters and sexual depictions.

The thread, by its very nature invited sexual content though. Sharing "Waifu." Images is obviously going to be sexual by it's nature as it revolves around hot anime women.

... My integrity towards my feelings towards my Waifu is being challenged... -_-

 

[Antvasima]

I have to go to bed now. I hope that Promestein or Sera can handle adding the new discussion rule.

 

[Promestein]

It's not just minors, there's a lot of borderline **** for other characters

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

We already have a rule against sexual/nudity/pornographic images as well as overly pornographic role play; as those violate Fandom's TOS unless the wiki is explicitly for Adult Content. But we do need a rule regarding threads prone to attracting stuff like that.

 

[Sera_EX]

How about we add "also do not create image-sharing threads that are prone to attracting these kinds of images" to the rule DDM speaks of.

 

[00potato]

^ this

 

[DarkDragonMedeus]

The current Site Rule is this.

• Being sexually flirtatious will not be tolerated. Playing mature games, flirting, or using sexual connotations with minors is strictly prohibited.

I suppose we can add it to make it look like this.

• Being sexually flirtatious will not be tolerated. Playing mature games, flirting, or using sexual connotations with minors is strictly prohibited. Also do not create image-sharing threads that are prone to attracting these kinds of images.

 

[Elizhaa]

^^

This update looks good, to me.

 

[The_Wright_Way]

Seconded.

 

[GojiBoyForever]

I will change also with "in addition". It sounds better to me.

 

[Sera_EX]

Wait, there's a misunderstanding. Prom was talking about images people are posting on threads, not flirting with minors or erotic role-playing. There's a thick line between "posting suggestive images of any kind) and roleplaying or flirting.

In that case, we should just make the rule that should've already existed (no NSFW images) and add "also do not create image-sharing threads that are prone to attracting these kinds of images" to it.