Thank you for helping out.
Just lengthening it seems fine. This logic of "If we extend the ban that makes him more likely to make a sock puppet than permanently banning" makes no sense.Gewsbumpz dude said:I mean, the warnings are clearly not working in the slightest, and if we just extend it that would just higher the chances of him making another sock puppet. So ban him permanently.
Really? I think I remember people that weren't permabanned the first time not getting permabans for having socks.ShadowWarrior1999 said:People who make sock accounts typically get perma bans. I don't see why we should make an exception here.
He called everyone here libtards. That's pretty fucking malicious if you ask me.The Axiom of Virgo said:Overall I think a ban is too extreme (given the context), sure a more stern warning but it's not like he say or did anything overly malicious but that's just my two cents.
You just behavior very admin like. It's just that funny ironically. Nothing more.Antvasima said:Except that I am a moderate conservative anti-globalist of course, which I have got into repeated trouble for, although a very left-leaning one in terms of economic policy, and I'm still somehow your chosen target.
Discord doesn't count.DarkGrath said:Look, I'll be honest, Corgi.
I'm normally the kind of person to defend people making jokes to any extent, even to the point of being outright offensive. But you're really causing a lot of trouble here. You don't just make offensive jokes and comments, you outright direct them towards specific people in quite blatantly passive aggressive ways and then call off all blame on yourself afterwards by saying that it's "all just a joke".
The ability to take a personally offensive joke is a virtue, not an obligation. Action will have to be taken if you keep going out of your way to directly target and offend people.
False, direct communication with other members in such a way is ban worthy regardless of it being on the site or not.Corgi the Gen Z God said:Schnee, if you make Discord shenanigans the problem on the wiki, that's on you. Not me because I choose it to be on Discord to not make it said problem.
If this is true he probably shouldn't be unbanned. This sounds like he's already gotten his second chance and his third chance, yet has still misbehaved.ShadowWarrior1999 said:We already decided before that ZaStando can't come back, I don't know why he thinks this time would be any different. ZaStando would only cause trouble by lashing out at people who don't agree with his exaggerated tiering on Sonic. Then when people express their distaste for how he acts, he frames it as them "cyberbullying" him. He already made a promise to behave before only to act up again and that's what got him permanently banned.
Oh and this part of his comment "I just remembered that before my second ban I received no warning which is concerning, I'm of the few members of the wiki who has received no warning"
This is wrong as Ant told him to stop but he didn't listen and still kept going so then he got banned.