• An important announcement about how to solve problems with your discussion thread notifications, and other important issues.

    Please click here for further information.
  • Important information regarding the linking of images from Fandom wikis.

    Please click here for further information.
  • Important information regarding upcoming advertisements in this forum.

    Please click here for further information.

Rule Violations Reports - 61

Status
Not open for further replies.

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
99,790
20,936
Please report any rule violations in this thread. Notifying us of such incidents is highly appreciated.

Additionally, kindly report any sockpuppets that you come across.

Only report violations regarding the wiki rules. False reports due to personal vendettas are unacceptable.

Also, this thread should be for reporting actual rule-breaking, not every single little disagreement.

In cases of extreme vandalism or trolling, you can report the accounts at the VSTF wiki.

If blocked members create sockpuppet accounts to circumvent their block repetitively, or several are created at almost the same time, you may contact the Fandom Staff, to politely request permanent range IP blocks.

You can also find specific users with the Search Function by typing with the format: "User:Username"

Here is a useful page for discovering sockpuppet accounts: https://vsbattles.fandom.com/wiki/Special:Log/newusers

Notes:

All staff members, kindly follow and bookmark this thread.

Remember to inform members via their message walls if that you have reported them here, in case they have performed severe enough rule-violations to risk being blocked. However, this should only be used in uncertain cases, not if they have done something instantly ban worthy, or if their offenses are minor.

It is against the Fandom rules to upload any offensive images to the wiki, so in order to show screencapture evidence of extremely bad behaviour, you must use external sites, such as Gyazo or Imgur, in order to not get globally banned yourself by the higher-ups:

https://gyazo.com

https://imgur.com/

https://pasteboard.co

Do not derail the Rule Violation Threads with irrelevant nonsense or internal disputes. It is solely for making serious, warranted reports of violations of the Site, Discussio, and Editing Rules, and not for discussion or side comments. Such posts should preferably be removed by the staff, and if a member continues to derail after being repeatedly told to stop, this will result in a temporary ban.

Given the extreme levels of systematic harrassment towards this community, kindly remember to not share/post any evidence of malware or child abuse publicly in order to prevent unwillful distribution. Submit any evidence of child abuse and severe systematic threats to the police.

If something goes outside the jurisdiction of the VS Battles wiki bureaucrats, or even the global Fandom staff, you need to report it personally to the authorities.

Also, absolutely do not click on any random links from suspicious users. You could potentially access content that contains dangerous malware or illegal types of pornography, alternately tracks your IP address and location. If you are uncertain, please use this page to verify that the links are not dangerous.

However, do not feed the trolls by discussing their behaviour here, as they get excited and motivated by any form of attention. Strictly report them to the staff, who then block them and mass-delete their contributions.

If there are genuine serious problems with the behaviour of certain staff members, do not cause drama by extensively arguing about it here, but rather contact the Human Resources Group.
 
2,460
235
Hello, sorry for the disturbance user The Causality is, in this thread https://vsbattles.com/vsbattles/3747888, asking that to make changes to a universe dimensions without first making thread or UTR all based on his opinion of the meaning of the word dimension, if he is right make the changes as swiftly as he wants, if not please stop him or asking to make a thread as he is bloating the existing one about serious changes by Ultima
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,635
6,925
If you could link the specific comments or threads made that link the connections/similarities to Crypt Lord, that would be helpful.
 

DarkGrath

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
3,617
1,792
For the whole Crypt Lord situation, there is this thread which makes them seem extremely suspicious. They made their account very soon after Crypt Lord was banned, and then proceeded to start commenting on this thread extremely soon afterwards with the same arguments and a very similar "speech pattern", if that makes sense. I'm not sure if it's conclusive enough to support a ban, but I definitely think someone should keep an eye on it.
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,635
6,925
I have left GreenCyan a light reminder, he doesn't seem malicious but perhaps he could simply be naive. As for Grrrand Maguzzz, I don't think that may be enough evidence, but I can watch out for him in the mean time.
 
@The Axiom of Virgo I changed it to Black Widow, who is 9-B

Anyway, if this happens to any other matches both for MCU and outside MCU, how do you change it from VS Thread to Fun and Games
 
That's it. I have crossed the line, I have done way too much and caused too much trouble

Can you guys ban me for a day?? I think I need a bit of break from here and to do other stuff
 
I'm Blue daba dee daba die said:
@The Axiom of Virgo I changed it to Black Widow, who is 9-B

Anyway, if this happens to any other matches both for MCU and outside MCU, how do you change it from VS Thread to Fun and Games
Not to be rude but you only changed it and edited out the spite language after you were called out, you yourself even admitted the match(es) was done out of spite.

Anyway I suggest you ask a member of staff for help, since I'm not really experienced at navigating this site however you shouldn't let personal bias affect you like that, like The Calaca said this has been on going for weeks now, give it a rest buddy.

EDiT; this isn't ban worthy but you need to learn when to call it quits.
 

Antvasima

VS Battles
Bureaucrat
Sysop
99,790
20,936
It seems like Blue is being reasonable here, so he should just stop making spite threads, and the problem is over.
 
DarkGrath said:
I don't think what's shown is report worthy, unless he starts getting genuinely hostile towards people who disagree with him.
Consediring that he was warned by an Admin not to do this.

And his comments make every VS Match relating a character a chore to deal with even though we debunk the same reasons every thread he is involved in,

He also makes very bad wanks like how he is Low 2-C due to a gag
 
Maverick Zero X said:
Repeatedly creating stomp threads is probably banworthy, though he seems more so naive and misinformed rather than malicious.
He created plenty of stomp threads, as well as constant wank and fallacies which, no matter how many times you refute them, he still tries to use them as talking points

DESPITE being warned twice by the staff, he hasn't shown a slight bit of effort

This guy is purpesfully not getting it
 
4,600
751
I'm with Blue here. Maybe he shouldn't be banned outright but this is the third stomp match made by him involving Gumball over the last few days. Something ought to be done.
 
Planck69 said:
I'm with Blue here. Maybe he shouldn't be banned outright but this is the third stomp match made by him involving Gumball over the last few days. Something ought to be done.
The wank itself is also a problem.

It is blatantly said in the rules don't do serious wank.

And when you get green saying Gumball can beat Reinhard Heydrich and the Endless due to toon force, or him being able to kill Dormammu and Dracula and Eru Iluvatar due to the magic notebook (He also used plenty of No Limits Fallacies), you got a problem
 
5,968
915
And when you get green saying Gumball can beat Reinhard Heydrich and the Endless due to toon force, you got a problem

I know I don't have to clutter this thread bu I want a link to that pls xD
 
Here

Around comment 273 (may be a bit above or below, read the whole thread and you will see plenty of wanks, NLF's, and strawmans by green) is when he says how the characters mentioned (which include classic strange, the abstracts, the endless, darkseid, and reinhard, he also said some notorius wank which said how gumball can beat dracula, eru iluvatar, and the one above all) will struggle with gumball due to toon force
 
And the biggest problem isn't his wanks and NLF's, it's his constant stomp matches as well as the fact he has ignored 2 warnings from staffs and many warnings from other users like me, gocommitd, maverick zero x, buttersami, soupywolf 5, and many others
 
3,968
406
Also, no matter how much we debunk his poor arguments, he always repeats himself ("Gumball can use the magic notebook to write '(character name) died'" during fights where characters have far faster attacks than writing something down, like his fight with Star Butterfly where she can say a spell that at worst have a max of 4-5 words, his fight with Bugs where bugs one-shotted and outhaxed, or he would debunk characters being physically stronger/durable than Gumball, like his fight with Spongebob where he claimed Gumball's 8-C claws could pop 8-A bubbles, ignoring the fact spongebob has a magic book himself, blatantly ignored the fact speed was equalized by saying Gumball is faster (by listing MFTL+ feats, which are outliers), and tried convincing us Gumball could make Spongebob explode with his 8-C explosions, and more recently his fight with Sonic where Green tried saying gumball could regenerate from Sonic's hits even though his regen got downgraded from low-godly to low-high recently)

He even says those in fights where Gumball is in-character, and whenever he's IC, he never really uses his hax, Gumball almost always wrestles people to the ground, but he *still* ignores this

it's like talking to a parrot because he goes great lengths to ensure his wanking is actually valid arguments
 

Moritzva

VS Battles
Joke Battles
FC/OC Battles
Thread Moderator
Content Moderator
8,109
1,172
I don't think he's a troll.

I think he simply is one of those people who view things based on "how it would probably go in their show," not too different from those who say "Saitama would one-shot Goku because Saitama always wins in one punch". They think Gumball will be fine no matter what, because in their show, it would be played off as a gag.

...If he was warned by staff, though, a ban seems reasonable. Who warned him?
 

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,349
6,215
Moritzva said:
I don't think he's a troll.

I think he simply is one of those people who view things based on "how it would probably go in their show," not too different from those who say "Saitama would one-shot Goku because Saitama always wins in one punch". They think Gumball will be fine no matter what, because in their show, it would be played off as a gag.

...If he was warned by staff, though, a ban seems reasonable. Who warned him?
Screenshot 20191223-231944 Chrome
 
3,968
406
I tried to cut him some slack at first, i really tried because he doesn't seem malicious, but now he keeps going on saying "Gumball has toon force, (character) doesn't, toon force rules say if something is funny, it will happen, so gumball defeating (character) will happen"

one good example is in this thread, it requires bits of scrolling but he kept insisting gumball stomps Izuku Midoriya because Deku lacks toon force, and no matter how many legit arguments for deku i brought up, he kept insisting Gumball stomped

Also basically said gumball could beat the comic Dr Strange because toon force
 

Moritzva

VS Battles
Joke Battles
FC/OC Battles
Thread Moderator
Content Moderator
8,109
1,172
Ayup.

That's a ban. Two very explicit warnings, ignored.

...can someone message him that he's on this thread? I believe it's obligatory that you must notify someone they are being reported.
 
3,968
406
Also in gumball's fight with Spongebob, it's very easy to not miss him repeatedly ignoring legit arguments, we must've had 5 or 6 users (myself included) trying to get him to stop his repetitive mindset
 

The_Wright_Way

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
14,349
6,215
Moritzva said:
Ayup.

That's a ban. Two very explicit warnings, ignored.

...can someone message him that he's on this thread? I believe it's obligatory that you must notify someone they are being reported.
I have done so.
 

DarkGrath

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
3,617
1,792
I honestly do think at least a temporary block is justified. They've outright gone out of their way to ignore several warnings, which is already quite dubious in itself, but they've also proceeded to continue with the behaviour that they've been warned about. Something had aught to be done, and it's clear another warning won't get us anywhere.
 

DarkGrath

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
3,617
1,792
I doubt anything more than like, a couple weeks would be justified. His behaviour isn't abhorrently bad, but it's still not the kind of thing that can reasonably continue. Just a short-term block should get the point across that he can't keep doing this.
 
Here is a good justification:

"Consistently wanks Gumball` and uses Fallacies and Outliers to justify an extremely exxagerated profile of the character, also creates stomp matches and despite multiple warnings he has consistently shown this behavior. While it isn't malicious, this behavior is repetetive and tiring for users to deal with"
 
4,600
751
How about:

"Has been repeatedly exaggerating a character's statistics using various fallacies and outliers in addition to creating stomp matches with the character in question and continues to do this despite numerous warnings from users and staff to stop with his behaviour."
 

The_Impress

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
5,953
1,562
Cool off your aggressiveness, there's a difference between an opinion and an attack on the verse and their supporters, and I'm starting to note this pattern of poor behaviour against the verses you don't like, to the point I legitimately recommend you not to participate in these discussions anymore.

Alongside that, don't delete evidence for what you said, it's pointless anyhow since we can see what you type out through your Contributions page

This'll be your 2nd offense, keep in mind that we'd definitely consider action at the third offense
 
Zark2099 said:
Cool off your aggressiveness, there's a difference between an opion and an attack on the verse and their supporters, and I'm starting to note this pattern of poor behaviour against the verses you don't like, to the point I legitimately recommend you not to participate in these discussions anymore.
Alongside that, don't delete evidence for what you said, it's pointless anyhow since we can see what you type out through your Contributions page
I deleted it not to try to hide it, I deleted it because I didn't want to cause more problems from people reading it, If i left it It would just cause more problems
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,635
6,925
It is fine to delete and/or edit comments to avoid causing problems, but adding an apology for the comment would actually be better. Though, Zark is right that it might be best to at least take a break from debating said verses to cool down.
 
19,413
1,444
Not only that, you also always "downplaying" and spitting MCU a lot

I know its already brought before but man, you should know the difference between joking or not
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,635
6,925
Can we not derail the RVR thread with side conversations please? You may chat on message walls.
 

Andytrenom

VS Battles
Sysop
Human Resources
10,020
5,266
I've noticed this from him before, just randomly being disrespectful which needless to say is a problem
 

DarkDragonMedeus

The Sword and Shield of AKM Sama
VS Battles
Sysop
16,635
6,925
Yeah, calling people idiots is uncalled for, and what should be done about him? It seems he's gotten a warning. Should he get another more strict warning or a short block?
 

Schnee_One

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
61,440
6,842
With all due respect Dark a warning seems unnecessary

There is no Henry lacks the common sense to the point that he calls other people idiots and doesn't think it's rude, and he's been warned before

Banning I think is necessary
 

Schnee_One

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
61,440
6,842
I mean I don't think someone that has the common sense to read warnings sent to him on his behavior yet is so willing to be rude for absolutely no reason and provides literally nothing to this site deserves to be here at all

But to be nice, at least a month
 

Schnee_One

VS Battles
Thread Moderator
61,440
6,842
Well if THATS the case then letting him back here seems completely pointless

Anyone agree with a Perma?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top