• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)

Maniaunavailable said:
@Azertyhuuh is once again insulting in a CRT, even tho he already had over 3 warnings, this is a recurrent issue because he does it EVERY SINGLE TIME he talks on a crt, can we do something about it?

vsbattles.com

Addition of Higher-Dimensional Existence (4D) to Yogiri’s profile.

You can, but current state of the wiki would also allow you to have both. We literally dont give any abstract powers higher-D potency due to abstract stuff not being dimensioned.
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

Click to expand...
While we are on that, can we also review his behaviour in this thread?
vsbattles.com

I want a logical answer only with logic and not with emotion

This is the first time I have asked a question in this section I want to know how the forum here deals with characters whose true selves are laws or concepts and so on. For example, there is a personality whose true self is time, the concept of time itself, and for this reason he is supposed...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com


The moment someone disagrees with him, he just says how they are ignoring him, even if they are staff. (It may also be relevant since it was about AE, HDE, low 1A, and Yogiri...
 
A minor addition to the report against @Azertyhuuh

@Reiner04 gave him permission to make a comment with explicit instructions.
Since you brought it up first with zamasu profile, you are allowed to make "only 1" post. But do not bring any instant death or yogiri stuff. That staff thread is to deal with AE and HDE in general, not for verse as whole.
Click to expand...

Now with this, you would expect him to make a comment regarding AE and HDE, and possibly regarding Zamasu...

Now this is what he actually comments. (in a staff thread)
Permission granted by @Reiner04

Here is my personal opinion on this matter: the fundamental concepts that shape reality are not bound by the dimensional system, and this is something we all know because concepts, by their nature, are part of reality itself and encompass all possible dimensions. This is their nature. For example, a concept like Death applies to all beings in reality regardless of their level, even if they are L1A. The same applies to other concepts because their scope operates on a universal level of reality, independent of the dimensional system. This is their nature, and they inherently possess an L1A range on a universal level of reality.

I think that in this case, granting them range is better than giving them higher-dimensional existence in my view. Some have agreed with this, and matters related to concepts especially stir debate here. It seems the issue has gotten out of control. Characters that are themselves one of the fundamental concepts of reality should inherently have an L1A range.

Instead of granting higher-dimensional existence, giving full universal range (L1A) to characters that are themselves one of the concepts shaping reality seems logical to me
Click to expand...

Completely going off the rails, with his permission, and focuses more on his own agenda regarding this....
 
Maniaunavailable said:
@Azertyhuuh is once again insulting in a CRT, even tho he already had over 3 warnings, this is a recurrent issue because he does it EVERY SINGLE TIME he talks on a crt, can we do something about it?

vsbattles.com

Addition of Higher-Dimensional Existence (4D) to Yogiri’s profile.

You can, but current state of the wiki would also allow you to have both. We literally dont give any abstract powers higher-D potency due to abstract stuff not being dimensioned.
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com

Click to expand...
Dark_Soul20189 said:
While we are on that, can we also review his behaviour in this thread?
vsbattles.com

I want a logical answer only with logic and not with emotion

This is the first time I have asked a question in this section I want to know how the forum here deals with characters whose true selves are laws or concepts and so on. For example, there is a personality whose true self is time, the concept of time itself, and for this reason he is supposed...
vsbattles.com vsbattles.com


The moment someone disagrees with him, he just says how they are ignoring him, even if they are staff. (It may also be relevant since it was about AE, HDE, low 1A, and Yogiri...
Click to expand...
SweetDao said:
Yeah, I told him in one of his last thread that it will be the last time because I'm fed up with that. He continues and accuses me of stuff just because I don't agree with him.. It's just becoming annoying at that point.
Click to expand...
My first note is that, he's getting jumped a lot. Whatever the escalation results in, he is not the first aggressor in any of these. I think that it is a mitigating factor, if someone is acting out, that they are sort of being goaded into it by the other side. Not you guys, specifically, but in general.

As for the reported comments: I don't think he is insulting SweetDao there. He is baselessly accusing him, but that isn't exactly the same thing. The claim is that he is focusing on evidence that "belittles" characters. The post linked by SweetDao is an insult, though, and I think all of it falls under our broad category of "disruptive behavior". I think at the very least a formal warning is warranted for the continued behavior.

Dark_Soul20189 said:
A minor addition to the report against @Azertyhuuh

@Reiner04 gave him permission to make a comment with explicit instructions.


Now with this, you would expect him to make a comment regarding AE and HDE, and possibly regarding Zamasu...

Now this is what he actually comments. (in a staff thread)


Completely going off the rails, with his permission, and focuses more on his own agenda regarding this....
Click to expand...
I agree that this goes against what he received permission for, though our rules technically only say that staff can give permission, not limit the scope of what you can say. It might be considered a rule violation to sidetrack an official discussion, though there is some debate to be had about whether he did this, since that tends to need a continuous presence. Whether we want to slap a distinct warning on the user for not staying true to Reiner's instructions is a matter I'm neutral on.
 
Mr. Bambu said:
As for the reported comments: I don't think he is insulting SweetDao there. He is baselessly accusing him, but that isn't exactly the same thing. The claim is that he is focusing on evidence that "belittles" characters. The post linked by SweetDao is an insult, though, and I think all of it falls under our broad category of "disruptive behavior". I think at the very least a formal warning is warranted for the continued behavior.
Click to expand...
I just want to be clear, he was already reported for what I hyperlinked, I was merely showing that "it's fine, I don't care about that time, but next time I'll report you".
Mr. Bambu said:
My first note is that, he's getting jumped a lot. Whatever the escalation results in, he is not the first aggressor in any of these. I think that it is a mitigating factor, if someone is acting out, that they are sort of being goaded into it by the other side. Not you guys, specifically, but in general.
Click to expand...
Yeah, I even took his defense for that in an earlier report, but at one point, you can't just keep saying "he gets jumped on a lot/people are mean to him" as a reason for his behavior. I got insulted several times by him, on multiple occasions and in different ways, and I never once insulted him back nor belittled him.
 
I just want to be clear, he was already reported for what I hyperlinked, I was merely showing that "it's fine, I don't care about that time, but next time I'll report you".
Click to expand...
Good intel. Still think I'd extend a warning for the current case, though I am curious whether the last one resulted in a warning.

Yeah, I even took his defense for that in an earlier report, but at one point, you can't just keep saying "he gets jumped on a lot/people are mean to him" as a reason for his behavior. I got insulted several times by him, on multiple occasions and in different ways, and I never once insulted him back nor belittled him.
Click to expand...
Agree. It is a mitigating factor, not a nullification of blame.
 
Mr. Bambu said:
I agree that this goes against what he received permission for, though our rules technically only say that staff can give permission, not limit the scope of what you can say. It might be considered a rule violation to sidetrack an official discussion, though there is some debate to be had about whether he did this, since that tends to need a continuous presence. Whether we want to slap a distinct warning on the user for not staying true to Reiner's instructions is a matter I'm neutral on.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't say it’s entirely off topic, it just includes more explanation and extra elements than necessary, which, from his "perspective", are relevant to the topic. So I don't believe this is reportable or warning worthy. Neutral on the first report.
 
I am fine with Bambu's conclusions here. 🙏
 
Mr. Bambu said:
I agree that this goes against what he received permission for, though our rules technically only say that staff can give permission, not limit the scope of what you can say. It might be considered a rule violation to sidetrack an official discussion, though there is some debate to be had about whether he did this, since that tends to need a continuous presence. Whether we want to slap a distinct warning on the user for not staying true to Reiner's instructions is a matter I'm neutral on.
Click to expand...
Just to let everyone know... He posted again, this time without premissions...
 
This doesn't really concern me so feel free to delete this message but Azerty's previous “staff thread” was removed by Agnaa because he had no clue what a staff thread is, coupled with the fact that he is new and English isn't his first language presumably I would be more inclined to say that this was a mistake and not a malicious attempt at derailing a staff thread (Hanlon's Razor)
I informed him on his message wall.
If he still continues to derail then yes there's no defence.
 
Last edited:
Sorry for sending another message here, but I think this is helpful.
Cipher72 said:
I would be more inclined to say that this was a mistake and not a malicious attempt at derailing a staff thread (Hanlon's Razor)
I informed him on this message wall https://vsbattles.com/members/azertyhuuh.60361/
If he still continues to derail then yes there's no defence.
Click to expand...
I will state this, He was explicitly told by @Reiner04 he was not allowed to regularly comment on staff threads, but acted like he was entatiled to participate.

Azerty
Good idea, I should also be present in this discussion.
Click to expand...

Reiner
No. Its a staff thread. You need permission to comment.
Click to expand...


Azerty
Yes, this matter concerns me as well, so grant me permission to comment on it alone because it is important to me too. I also raised this issue and I will contribute to clarifying it.
Click to expand...

Reiner
Since you brought it up first with zamasu profile, you are allowed to make "only 1" post. But do not bring any instant death or yogiri stuff. That staff thread is to deal with AE and HDE in general, not for verse as whole.
Click to expand...

So yeah.... it was as explicit as possible, so their is no way it could have been a "mistake".
 
Cipher72 said:
This doesn't really concern me so feel free to delete this message but Azerty's previous “staff thread” was removed by Agnaa because he had no clue what a staff thread is, coupled with the fact that he is new and English isn't his first language presumably I would be more inclined to say that this was a mistake and not a malicious attempt at derailing a staff thread (Hanlon's Razor)
I informed him on this message wall https://vsbattles.com/members/azertyhuuh.60361/
If he still continues to derail then yes there's no defence.
Click to expand...
Personally I disagree with Azerty's ban right now. I share opinion with Cipher there. Technically his CRT, exactly his CRT raised good question of our wiki standards. He is getting better(probably. but I don't see exactly where he insults people?). About other things I wanted to say simply disagreeing and ignoring other people's disagreeing shouldn't equal to ban. Since debating and all scaling comes to subjective it justs comes to "whose interpretation is stronger". I would say it might be at best another warning but not ban or restriction.
 
i have been seeing Azerty interact with this wiki for a while now and honestly i just feel bad for him. Every time he wants to have a proper debate in a CRT, every one just clowns on him and no one takes him seriously. He is a new member and does not understand the rules that well so i think its a bit unfair. I can understand why he would also lash out since everyone else started making fun of him first but nothing happened to them
 
Dark_Soul20189 said:
Just to let everyone know... He posted again, this time without premissions...
Click to expand...
@Azertyhuuh Do not post in staff threads without explicit permission. I granted you permission for only one post only, not multiple and a thread mod can only grant permission for one post at a time. Please keep this in mind for the future. Consider this an informal warning.
 
Last edited:
does this count as a broken rule? sonic.exe is an OC

vsbattles.fandom.com

Sonic.EXE

"I AM GOD!" “You will suffer for all eternity. That is a promise.„ Sonic.EXE (The name is X in real form) is the nominal main antagonist of Sonic.EXE and other related works. Sonic.exe is an inter-dimensional energy-based entity that possesses a CD-ROM of the original Sonic the Hedgehog, taking...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
Maniaunavailable said:
does this count as a broken rule? sonic.exe is an OC

vsbattles.fandom.com

Sonic.EXE

"I AM GOD!" “You will suffer for all eternity. That is a promise.„ Sonic.EXE (The name is X in real form) is the nominal main antagonist of Sonic.EXE and other related works. Sonic.exe is an inter-dimensional energy-based entity that possesses a CD-ROM of the original Sonic the Hedgehog, taking...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
YmTheSuper and I handled it. 🙏


 
Maniaunavailable said:
does this count as a broken rule? sonic.exe is an OC

vsbattles.fandom.com

Sonic.EXE

"I AM GOD!" “You will suffer for all eternity. That is a promise.„ Sonic.EXE (The name is X in real form) is the nominal main antagonist of Sonic.EXE and other related works. Sonic.exe is an inter-dimensional energy-based entity that possesses a CD-ROM of the original Sonic the Hedgehog, taking...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
Click to expand...
Handled it, although for reporting such pages the profile deletion thread should suffice. And if you think a profile was maliciously made or heavily violates our rules then post it in the wiki vandalism reports thread instead of here.
 
Shadowslash125 said:
I wholeheartedly support banning him. Troll or not, he's breaching the rules, and seems to be too young to comprehend what's right or not, judging by the way he replies and is just metaphorically screaming at you.
Click to expand...
Well yeah, But I can't take the initiative, let the admins handle the ban stuff.
 
Antvasima said:
Sean is extremely persistent, and claims that he did not do what he is being accused of. My apologies for bringing up this tiresome issue again. 🙏

Click to expand...
Tell him to shup up atp, he's just saying nonsense and excuses for his crappy behavior.

If he must make profiles, he should either make blogs on Blogger, or make profiles on CSAP where there's no real rule and one can do whatever they want as long as they don't vandalize others' pages or break FANDOM rules.
 
Antvasima said:
Sean is extremely persistent, and claims that he did not do what he is being accused of. My apologies for bringing up this tiresome issue again. 🙏

Click to expand...
Sean does seem to agree those comments were too much. I'd oppose a permanent ban if not for those comments. Didn't Strym say those comments were made recently? If they were made years ago such as right after the Pokemon vs Digimon DB video was made, I could see the idea of improvement afterwards. It's not exactly a minor issue to say stuff like that though.
StrymULTRA said:
Tell him to shup up atp, he's just saying nonsense and excuses for his crappy behavior.
Click to expand...
He's allowed to speak, regardless of what anyone thinks of the things he's saying.
 
Kellex said:
I apologize for asking, but who is MikasaMakoto?
Click to expand...
From what I vaguely recall, MikotoMisaka is a longterm troll who used to create a lot of sockpuppets to cause problems in our community. 🙏

They took their username from this character:

vsbattles.fandom.com

Misaka Mikoto

Misaka Mikoto is a main heroine in Toaru Majutsu no Index and the main protagonist of Toaru Kagaku no Railgun. She is the third-ranked Level 5 esper and the strongest Electromaster in Academy City, nicknamed the Railgun due to her signature move. Kamijou Touma also coined the nickname Biri-Biri...
vsbattles.fandom.com vsbattles.fandom.com
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Agnaa
Fanart Rule Revamp
Replies
7
Views
2K
Antvasima
Antvasima
FinePoint
  • Locked
Clarifying Death Threat Rules
2
Replies
64
Views
6K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Kachon123
One Piece: Planet Size Discussion Rule
Replies
14
Views
2K
RaikiKurohane99
RaikiKurohane99
StarShooter80
Establishing Gap Needed for LS Stomps
Replies
14
Views
1K
StarShooter80
StarShooter80
Agnaa
  • Locked
Controversial Powers on New Pages - Editing Rules Tweak
2
Replies
69
Views
8K
Antvasima
Antvasima
Back
Top