- 3,194
- 7,842
Considering he hasn’t improved his behavior in over 5 years, that sounds reasonable to me.Permanently
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Considering he hasn’t improved his behavior in over 5 years, that sounds reasonable to me.Permanently
I will add to this by saying, although off site I suppose, Lina Shields has participated in the attempted doxxing of others, including minors.I honestly shouldn't even have to do this, but I'm calling for the ban of @ShieldsPlus, who previously went by Lina Shields.
This person exists to cause trouble and only seems to come out of the woodwork to do so, just as they did today on Mori's farewell post where he decided to instigate and label Mori a nazi.
I don't even know why this person is still around, but his intentions aren't pure and this is frankly ridiculous behavior.
Pretty sure some "doxxing" allegations turned out to be false, but I'd rather we not talk about that to promote further drama. Anyway, he's permanently banned for other reasons, so we should just move on from that.I will add to this by saying, although off site I suppose, Lina Shields has participated in the attempted doxxing of others, including minors.
I was going to report this too
@Catzlaflame Handled it.Reporting this user, for vandalism, which even involved reverting prior edits made by both GarrixianXD and Antvasima. It was already reverted, but it seems no-one has banned the vandal.
Update: it appears the original reverted edit upgrading Loki from 7-C to 2-A was made soon before this by this user, but this user appears to be generally a productive user, so I'm not as inclined to call it vandalism.
I’m on phone rn and logged out of my fandom account. Someone else will have to handle them.
I’m on phone rn and logged out of my fandom account. Someone else will have to handle them.
This comment is unnecessary. Please avoid making such remarks unless you have significant new and relevant information or are directly involved in the case.Time to impersonate staff
Regular members aren't allowed to post in this Rule Violation Reports thread, unless they are making a report here, have direct involvement in a report, or have relevant information about a report that has not been brought up yet, in order to not derail or delay the processing of the reports, or worse instigate further rule violations. Repeated violations will be followed with a strict warning, followed by a threadban for one week to a site ban for some duration, depending on the severity of their conduct.
Dread already dropped him a warning and I was informed that he was playing around with the source code and didn't mean to save the changes. Though, @PhantomØ4 don't goof around again.Reporting this user Phantom04 for vandalising Rimuru profile ?
Maybe you could start with showing images of this happening or at the bare minimum telling people where this happened?Would like to report @Expectro2000xxx . Generally disagreeing with someone alone isnt rvr worthy, but instead of directly responding to my arguments, he chooses to create patronizing comments, and tells people to straight up ignore my arguments.
@BasedNecoScaler69 You need to link to the posts in question.
If an argument is flawed, you could just easily counter it no? Comments like these are completely unneeded.due to flawed arguments.
Agreed.I wouldn't say it's report-worthy, as he is not forcing anyone to avoid responding to your posts but rather suggesting that they do so due to flawed arguments or stonewalling. The people can evaluate the facts on their own to determine whether it is true or not.
I would say he is more frustrated than disrespectful or insulting; if anything, both parties need to calm down.
I'm fine with that. I just hold the general belief that you should not call another member's arguments "bad" or "flawed" if it has some level of basis, especially when you refuse to back it up.I suppose that an instruction message to that member might be warranted, but not a full warning, and it is another member than the one you first reported.
I said that because you keep ignoring the text that has been shown to you multiple times, and I don't feel like dealing with that so early in the morning. Myself and others have shown clear frustration at this, and I'm frankly tired of it.If an argument is flawed, you could just easily counter it no? Comments like these are completely unneeded.
And i've given appropriate counters. ( statements being worded as questions, further retcons by released media after KNK)I said that because you keep ignoring the text that has been shown to you multiple times, and I don't feel like dealing with that so early in the morning. Myself and others have shown clear frustration at this, and I'm frankly tired of it.
There is a distinction between labeling an argument as 'flawed' and directly calling someone bad or insulting the user.I'm fine with that. I just hold the general belief that you should not call another member's arguments "bad" or "flawed" if it has some level of basis, especially when you refuse to back it up.
For the record, I can think of many instances where an instruction message was not dished out to users who’ve said stuff that would make what Nanaya/Expectro said look like compliments.I suppose that an instruction message to that member might be warranted, but not a full warning, and it is another member than the one you first reported.
I've only posted a similar thread once before, and even then, I reconstructed and added a few new arguments. I requested to have the other one closed, so its ot like im posting rejected argumentsAlso, supposedly the irritation in that thread stems from the OP recreating and reposting the same thread/Arguments again and again. Now if it was just Nanaya/Expectro that were trying to relay this narrative, it’d be questionable, but I count six different users who claimed this to be the case. If this is the case, then a confrontational remark may be understandable.
Okay. Never mind then.I said that because you keep ignoring the text that has been shown to you multiple times, and I don't feel like dealing with that so early in the morning. Myself and others have shown clear frustration at this, and I'm frankly tired of it.
Also, I call everyone Lil bro.
Any staff member is welcome to comment in this case, but I don't believe any serious instruction or warning is necessary.
Agreed. This seems to have been a waste of our time.Personally, I do not believe that any action needs to be taken at all
Someone reported me for something, I just outlined their general behavior in that thread. Otherwise I dont think so?Have you done this kind of thing previously as well? I vaguely recall that.
after checking using the search function, no, he does not.Okay, so you do not repeatedly make nonsense reports?