- 19,540
- 15,844
I think a warning is the most appropriate. If we do historical research I'm vaguely confident Buercrats have temp banned people for stone walling before as the primary justification.
I just don't think it's warranted here.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
I just don't think it's warranted here.
- 16,910
- 11,937
Reporting this user for consistently creating stomp matches. (I.E MU's such as placing 3-D characters against characters with higher dimensional hax. Here and here.)
Definitely not a serious issue but they should be told not to create spite matches. It should be common sense not to be throwing 3-D characters with relatively no hax and resistances against characters with literal tier 1 hax.
Edit: The user was banned previously from Nasuverse threads for similar reasons.
Definitely not a serious issue but they should be told not to create spite matches. It should be common sense not to be throwing 3-D characters with relatively no hax and resistances against characters with literal tier 1 hax.
Edit: The user was banned previously from Nasuverse threads for similar reasons.
- 3,346
- 1,900
Supporters for both of these matches have brought up wincons. If there is even a single wincon, its not a stomp. You have also made multiple attacks on my intelligence on that page.
- 16,910
- 11,937
Not true in the slightest, one of my first comments was telling you it's a stomp either way. Shiki can't defend against 4-A passive force, without it he gets haxxed into oblivion.
Definitely wasn't an attack first of all, it's stating facts. You are intentionally ignoring the information that's being spoon-fed to you while also simultaneously implying Bleach fans are creating lies.
Obviously whenever multiple users have to explain the same concept to you simply because you want to act out of ignorance then they aren't going to be nice about it at some point.
- 16,910
- 11,937
Like you were literally banned from all Nasuverse threads for similar reasons not too long ago.
Edit: And they extended the topic ban length about 3 separate times so it should speak volumes for itself there.
Edit: And they extended the topic ban length about 3 separate times so it should speak volumes for itself there.
- 3,346
- 1,900
All I wanted is where the verse page says rc affects physical matter. because the verse page implies a different story.
the fact that 99% of the fights occur in hueco mundo or ss, where EVERYTHING is made out of reishi the rocks, trees,people, etc, isnt exactly proving the contrary.
- 16,910
- 11,937
It's literally in the verse page lad. It's just you not being able to pay attention to the terminology section.
Irrelevant, two separate locations that work differently from the WoTL. Anyway stop derailing, this is about you acting ignorant, ignoring information while spreading blatantly misinformation while also implying that a whole Fandom is lying.
- 3,166
- 7,810
Alright, let's not start a flamewar here since that won't be much help at all. Please don't continue to argue and let the staff handle it from now on.
- 164,997
- 71,756
- Thread starter
- #23,969
Okay. Then I also support banning those accounts.
- 276
- 23
Hello, I do have a report to make, how can I report somebody? Do I need to submit here?
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,610
- 3,605
yes, you press the report button at the bottom left of the message you want to report. Or you @ the user and what they did, and link the offense
- 276
- 23
I did. What else do I need to explein ? What is going on?
KingNanaya
He/Him- 2,610
- 3,605
- 276
- 23
@Brogeefrong ignored his own comment and to answers to that comment and stated he will not argue anymore. [ Its a 7 page VS Thread ] between Sonic and Rimuru
" can we stop derailing this on deciding what concept rimuru can resurrect from, sonic still has other ways of winning and doing it faster then rimuru"
"????? I explained to you... and you said go make CRT am I getting ignored?"
"I already said it's not specified on profile, so we can't use it in this thread, and if you want it applied you can make a crt for it to be applied but, it's not so we can not use something that is not applied"
He stated before all of this that we need to make a CRT so we can learn what kind of concept rimuru can ressurect from.
later he stated like in the comment above.
" can we stop derailing this on deciding what concept rimuru can resurrect from, sonic still has other ways of winning and doing it faster then rimuru"
And I expleined this before. and I answered like this, but I guess he did not like my answer.
vsbattles.com
" can we stop derailing this on deciding what concept rimuru can resurrect from, sonic still has other ways of winning and doing it faster then rimuru"
"????? I explained to you... and you said go make CRT am I getting ignored?"
"I already said it's not specified on profile, so we can't use it in this thread, and if you want it applied you can make a crt for it to be applied but, it's not so we can not use something that is not applied"
He stated before all of this that we need to make a CRT so we can learn what kind of concept rimuru can ressurect from.
later he stated like in the comment above.
" can we stop derailing this on deciding what concept rimuru can resurrect from, sonic still has other ways of winning and doing it faster then rimuru"
And I expleined this before. and I answered like this, but I guess he did not like my answer.
sannic vs rimoo(ln) ez lolololol|Sonic vs Rimuru LN (7-0-0) Grace completed
I'm the one who's getting ignored...
- 1,646
- 2,532
Uh this is absolutely not something that can be reported @DeusExMachine001 Rule Violations Reports are based off of things that don't allign with the Discussion Rules
To clarify, this begins roughly around here:
DuesEx is arguing that LN rimuru's conceptual regeneration can regenerate from type 1 concepts, however, this is not listed on the profile (the type 1 part, not the actual regeneration).
@Brogeefrong States that if the type 1 part is not listed, you cannot conclude that the regeneration is at that level
They argue about it a bit in a peacful manner (no noteworthy insults or personal attacks), until Borg no longer wishes to continue arguing and describes DeusEx's behavior as stonewalling, and notes that the conversation is irrelevant since supposedly Sonic has other wincons which is what led to the report.
There is nothing here that could be report worthy. Not wishing to continue an argument is not a rule violation. Moreover, they are correct, you, in fact, do need a CRT to prove that someone's regeneration is at that level.
To clarify, this begins roughly around here:
DuesEx is arguing that LN rimuru's conceptual regeneration can regenerate from type 1 concepts, however, this is not listed on the profile (the type 1 part, not the actual regeneration).
@Brogeefrong States that if the type 1 part is not listed, you cannot conclude that the regeneration is at that level
They argue about it a bit in a peacful manner (no noteworthy insults or personal attacks), until Borg no longer wishes to continue arguing and describes DeusEx's behavior as stonewalling, and notes that the conversation is irrelevant since supposedly Sonic has other wincons which is what led to the report.
There is nothing here that could be report worthy. Not wishing to continue an argument is not a rule violation. Moreover, they are correct, you, in fact, do need a CRT to prove that someone's regeneration is at that level.
- 276
- 23
Its stated to be Conceptual level we just dont know if its concept type 1 or not
- 3,166
- 7,810
This is not something to be discussed here.
- 276
- 23
- 868
- 218
I want to make a report for this person @CHIDOSKI making a comment like this in our crt should be considered as rule violation.
Even if he deleted his comment I won't forgive this guy.
- 4,461
- 5,575
What thread was this comment made in?
- 868
- 218
Cosmology Revision : Range and Tier upgrade of Tensura characters
The cardinal world itself is already a 5-D world since there’s no 4-D worlds capable of going to the cardinal world with their own abilities and not to mention that the cardinal world inhabitants can go to other 4-D worlds Its 5D by inhibiting the 100 timelines of the labyrinth
This crt but he deleted his comment because he didn't want to get caught.
Last edited:
- 4,461
- 5,575
I've looked through the thread and can confirm the existence of the message. I can also see they have already been warned in the past on their message wall by FinePoint for similar behaviour, and they've recieved another warning from Lephyr for antagonising other users. This makes for a third infraction, and a lot of trouble for someone who has only posted 9 messages in total at this point.
The fact that they've contributed sporadically over a rather extended period, and not just made trolly remarks in those instances, makes me think they probably aren't a troll. However, they should obviously know better than to post demeaning replies like those by common sense, let alone after receiving their prior warnings.
I would consider either a strong third warning, or just a temporary ban. I'm leaning on the latter - if the previous two warnings were blatantly unacknowledged, I imagine a short time away from the wiki (say, in the range of a month) might make the message more clear that they had ought to address their issues with communication.
The fact that they've contributed sporadically over a rather extended period, and not just made trolly remarks in those instances, makes me think they probably aren't a troll. However, they should obviously know better than to post demeaning replies like those by common sense, let alone after receiving their prior warnings.
I would consider either a strong third warning, or just a temporary ban. I'm leaning on the latter - if the previous two warnings were blatantly unacknowledged, I imagine a short time away from the wiki (say, in the range of a month) might make the message more clear that they had ought to address their issues with communication.
- 9,631
- 10,327
Thanks to both of u for handling my case as early as possible given that I'm busy to be invested here for now. I still do have one request that if I can be banned for 3 months due to my studies.
- 18,393
- 14,310
No problems and please request this in this thread instead (and I know you could have done it but no excuses)
- 164,997
- 71,756
- Thread starter
- #23,985
I think that a medium-long ban of at least 6 months or so seems appropriate, given that they have no history of constructive contributions.
- 32,738
- 37,878
Reporting FeebasExE for being a sock of Sniper670. I recently asked Antvasima to do a check and our forum's system detected them to be the same person.
Plus, his behavior should speak for itself. He seems to be very obsessed with Pokemon-related stuff (The Ayewale stuff and his PFP) and has acted with arrogance and dismissiveness in many Tier 1 threads recently, and even some high-end hax threads (Which Sniper670 also used to do), providing no meaningful contribution whatsoever and simply mocking people for such threads and accusing them of mental gymnastics, as well as his hatred for God of War, as seen in this thread when he threw a jab and derailed (Also something Sniper670 would do on a regular basis back when Kratos vs Arceus was going on).
Plus, his behavior should speak for itself. He seems to be very obsessed with Pokemon-related stuff (The Ayewale stuff and his PFP) and has acted with arrogance and dismissiveness in many Tier 1 threads recently, and even some high-end hax threads (Which Sniper670 also used to do), providing no meaningful contribution whatsoever and simply mocking people for such threads and accusing them of mental gymnastics, as well as his hatred for God of War, as seen in this thread when he threw a jab and derailed (Also something Sniper670 would do on a regular basis back when Kratos vs Arceus was going on).
Last edited by a moderator:
- 9,018
- 9,235
Permaban away.
- 164,997
- 71,756
- Thread starter
- #23,988
I handled it.
- 3,166
- 7,810
Reporting this user for unsolicited changes on this profile.
vsbattles.fandom.com
I left them a final warning on their message wall since this isn't the first time they have done it.
Zodiac (2007)
After being fired from his job as a teacher for "touching" his students, Arthur Leigh Allen was angry. He wanted to hurt people, and so he became the serial killer, Zodiac. Being ex-navy, he was skilled with basic codes and cyphers, as well as firearms. He evaded and taunted the police for...
vsbattles.fandom.com
I left them a final warning on their message wall since this isn't the first time they have done it.
- 1,646
- 2,532
I mentioned it below your warning: I believe there was actually a CRT, but mind you their editing is still very poor. @Testarossa002 please link the CRT next time to prevent things like this from happeningThis user has made a series of edits on Riordan profiles without a CRT (at least they didn't link one).
Poseidon (Riordan)
Poseidon is the Greco-Roman god of the sea, earthquakes, and storms and the elder brother of Zeus. He is referred to as one of the Big Three, the three most powerful Greek Gods, and is the father of Perseus Jackson, whom he conceived with a mortal in violation of the treaty made decades ago...
Hades (Riordan)
I swear, as long as my children remain outcasts, as long as I labour under the curse of your Great Prophecy, the Oracle of Delphi will never have another mortal host. You will never rest in peace. No other will take your place. Your body will wither and die, and still the Oracle’s spirit will be...
Hera (Riordan)
Hera is the Greek goddess of marriage, motherhood, women, and familial love. She is the youngest daughter of Rhea and Kronos, as well as the older sister and wife of Zeus, and therefore the Queen of Olympus. Her Roman counterpart is Juno. Tier: High 6-A, possibly High 4-C Name: Hera, Juno...
These were only a fraction of the edits I've reverted, and not to mention those edits were very poorly applied. Anyways, I already dropped a warning on their message wall but just keeping everyone's heads up.
- 3,166
- 7,810
@Testarossa002 I should have reinstated all your edits by now. Contact me on my message wall or DMs if I missed any.
- 4,461
- 5,575
I don't think that'd be for the best. As mentioned, I don't think they are a troll - they're not a constructive contributor, yes, but they could be if they shaped up. At this stage, I would rather unambiguously establish to them that further infractions will result in a serious punishment, rather than jumping to a serious punishment. My recommendation of either a strong, final warning or a short ban remains.
Mr. Bambu
Suffer-Not-Injustice Bambu
VS Battles
Joke Battles
Super Moderator
Administrator
Calculation Group
Silver Supporter
- 21,395
- 18,342
Given the multiple warnings in the past, I'd be more inclined to agree to your previous position on a short ban (one month seemed perfect to me). While I agree that the man probably isn't an outright troll, some form of backing must be given to our warnings. I think two prior warnings for this exact behavior is enough to see that warnings alone will not rehabilitate this sort of behavior.
Abstractions
Femur Breaker
VS Battles
FC/OC VS Battles
Administrator
Content Moderator
Human Resources
- 2,620
- 2,666
I honestly shouldn't even have to do this, but I'm calling for the ban of @ShieldsPlus, who previously went by Lina Shields.
This person exists to cause trouble and only seems to come out of the woodwork to do so, just as they did today on Mori's farewell post where he decided to instigate and label Mori a nazi.
I don't even know why this person is still around, but his intentions aren't pure and this is frankly ridiculous behavior.
This person exists to cause trouble and only seems to come out of the woodwork to do so, just as they did today on Mori's farewell post where he decided to instigate and label Mori a nazi.
I don't even know why this person is still around, but his intentions aren't pure and this is frankly ridiculous behavior.
- 4,461
- 5,575
I read those posts just moments ago.
I would agree with a ban. Leveraging a staff member's farewell announcement to insult them, including calling them a 'Nazi', is obscene. It had ought to be rectified swiftly.
- 29,900
- 30,918
Yeah, that was clearly a post made at such a bad place and a bad timing. Not even sure why he pops in from time to time when he seems to make it perfectly clear he doesn't want to be on the site. Surprised he didn't just simply asked to be banned from the community, but I agree with the ban all things considered.
- 3,166
- 7,810
How long should we ban him for?
Similar threads
