- 31,427
- 34,253
I agree with First Witch and Bambu, the only thing lightly wrong was just forgetting to link the URL to the content revision. Which isn't too bad.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But i did a CRT and it was acceptedThese edits are mostly clarifications and source-adding based on what's already accepted; he should receive a light warning and be told the proper process. @XxZetsuxX You need to pass a proper CRT to enact changes to statistics, including abilities, even if they may seem self-evident to you. You're getting a warning because you seem to want to genuinely help.
Link them whenever you edit profiles. Every. Time.But i did a CRT and it was accepted
When you edit a page, there should be a box if you scroll down that says "Reasons" for the edit. Which you can simply copy/paste the URL of the content revision into that box before hitting publish.How do i do that?
Alright, Thanks for explaining it to me, I will tryWhen you edit a page, there should be a box if you scroll down that says "Reasons" for the edit. Which you can simply copy/paste the URL of the content revision into that box.
I'm having trouble with the tabber :c
The report against you were dropped. Kindly refrain from posting like that on the Rule Violation Thread please.Just need to add the scans...
You're fine, Witchy revealed that there was in fact a CRT, just please be sure to link it when you're putting through the edits so we can know that in the future. You aren't getting any form of actual punishment and there's no need to worry about it, it just helps to avoid situations like this in the future, if you catch my drift. Continue on.But i did a CRT and it was accepted
User @Peppersalt43, while not directly doing a major violation of the rules, should atleast get a warning. His behaviour of putting likes on EVERY post he comes across is frustrating. It floods the notifications of people, and genuienly frustrates them. Me included, especially since I am in so little the spam of his liking floods my notifications in an annoying way.
And he doesn't listen when you ask him nicely to stop. I told him my issues with it and told him to stop on his page, and yet he kept on going. I would like him to atleast stop liking my posts.
And how do I do that? And sorry, it's just bothersome and didn't know where else to go for this if the guy was unwilling to listen.This again?
You just need to disable the notification of the likes you receive
there were revisions that were recently accepted, but I'm fairly certain a blog was supposed to have been made first before the edits.Don't believe the changes were supposed to be implemented yet.
User changed Trunks Statistics
I rollbacked the edits
it is agreed that a cosmology blog need to be made first before applying the chance, anyway let staffs decide this situation, i just here to clarify, now i need to sleep, it late in my countrythere were revisions that were recently accepted, but I'm fairly certain a blog was supposed to have been made first before the edits.
I’m not gonna comment on how legitimate the abilities are, I’m just going to say that if this person wants to remove them, they need to make a CRT.
No. We shouldn’t be allowing someone to remove abilities from a profile without going through the proper channels to do so.
I absolutely agree with Tracer on this. This isn't the place to have this discussion, and edits without accepted CRTs should not be allowed.
Okay. Never mind then.There wasn’t a CRT supporting those edits unlike the revision with Tartaglia. I’m 100 percent with LordTracer and Uchihaslayer96 on this.
I'm all for this person sticking around, and all for regular members making small edits to improve the quality of pages (grammar, spelling, etc), but this edit was a significant overhaul of the abilities section with no CRT as of yet.
This very edit was rolled back by Antvasima months ago.
Also, has anybody handled this yet?I don't see the need for a ban either. Just a warning not to make major edits without getting approval through a CRT should suffice.
It is up to everybody to disable their own "like" notifications. It is handled quite easily, as shown in the thread linked below (although I likely need to update the screencaptures to turn more up-to-date). Otherwise most of us will often drown in pointless notifications, and it is not remotely limited to a single members.User @Peppersalt43, while not directly doing a major violation of the rules, should atleast get a warning. His behaviour of putting likes on EVERY post he comes across is frustrating. It floods the notifications of people, and genuienly frustrates them. Me included, especially since I am in so little the spam of his liking floods my notifications in an annoying way.
And he doesn't listen when you ask him nicely to stop. I told him my issues with it and told him to stop on his page, and yet he kept on going. I would like him to atleast stop liking my posts.
I dont care about the rest of the report, but he is right about this, @Reiner Made a thread and disguised it as removing a misleading word when in actuality he is trying to change the standard. DT even commented on that thread reinforcing the standard but he ignored DT's post and even added him as agree when he clearly did not, something DT also pointed out later and I also pointed out the same thing when I saw him agree with DT, to which he kept brushing off. So yes they indeed altered the standards, if he disguised changing the standards as removing a misleading word so they can make upgrades about their verses which they did immediately they passed that thread.1. Baselessly accused both Ben 10 and Dragon Ball supporters of altering standards for personal benefit
Man, can u show me when I brushed off what DT said? He just told me to add a elaboration which I did in his own words. Which I told you in the same thread continuesly, I added @DontTalkDT's words as it is. May you tell me how it's wrong?
I have my University to deal with, I made it to clear off the standard when saw DB thread, with brief discussion with @Planck69, also that DT's current version is no different than the current draft we have. Direction is yet not needed. So yeah, I've to deal with everything as soon as possible to get off of wiki and study. That's why it's obvious I created my all threads and creating my all threads with no gap. These accusations are just way out of place now. Since 3 months I'm banning myself and unbanning myself, isn't it's obvious why?he disguised changing the standards as removing a misleading word so they can make upgrades about their verses which they did immediately they passed that thread.
Okay, a bit off your comment since Reiner has the right to defend himself from the accusations that are being made against him even if it is one post, but more discussion would be better avoided and let the staff decide.Stop arguing and let the staff handle the case.
There were many other staff in that thread as well. You may want contact them.I will tell DontTalk to comment here.
I don't have the time currently to look into the above matter, but I can undo this quickly before sleeping. I dunno how much it would matter if we wanna drop the user a warning given they've been gone for a couple months, but feel free to do so if desired.Just noticed this. A couple months ago this user added an ability to Adam Taurus’ page without a CRT. Seems to be their only edit too.
I would like to add that @PrinceofPein was also involved in this, as he's been making similar comments as geor on threads using hypertimeline standards. The idea of creating a staff discussion thread was peins idea to begin with.Reporting @Georredannea15 for the following reasons :
1. Baselessly accused both Ben 10 and Dragon Ball supporters of altering standards for personal benefit.
2. Ignored three warnings from an Admin on separate threads, and kept stonewalling one of them.
3. Created a staff thread out of clear spite to disqualify verses without a clear understanding of the subject matter.
4. Tried to (repeatedly) guide the staff members on the staff thread to add a very specific note. Now about this point, this is just a personal thought, but considering what i posted above and the continuos pursue in trying to convince staff, i think i have a valid motivation for believing this is being done in bad faith.
This is all. Hopefully, this will be the first and last time i'll have to touch this thread.
The same user also vandalized Spongebob's profile; they're a clear troll.This user vandalized Modern Sonic's profile.
Undone the vandalism.This user vandalized Modern Sonic's profile.
the profile is also supposed to be locked, so could you also lock it?Blocked.
Which, Sonic or Spongebob?the profile is also supposed to be locked, so could you also lock it?