• This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.

    For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here.
  • We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.

    Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.

    Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page.
  • Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.

Rule Violation Reports (New forum)


it seems like this is a spite match, and this person is just debating with himself, which I have a suspicion that he's not well in his mind
Ah yes, it is indeed a spite match, isn't it? I should be banned for this violation of rules. That is the only way I might learn to not make and fun and games post containing spite matches and derailment.
 
Ah yes, it is indeed a spite match, isn't it? I should be banned for this violation of rules. That is the only way I might learn to not make and fun and games post containing spite matches and derailment.
Since it is a fun and games thread it seems harmless, as long as none of our rules have been broken. 🙏
 
Since it is a fun and games thread it seems harmless, as long as none of our rules have been broken. 🙏
Ah, very well. I thank you for your patience with me. I am sorry if I caused any harm to anyone with my little fun. I get lonely a lot, so I just go on random sites and do stuff. I once again apologize to anyone who has been disturbed by my actions. Thank you.
 
You acknowledged your mistake but didn't revert it, a warning is fine with me, but it should be a strong one.
Okay. I think that is perfectly acceptable to apply. 🙏
Is somebody able and willing to apply tbe warnings and update our warning tracker accordingly please? 🙏
 
Okay. I think that is perfectly acceptable to apply. 🙏
How was I supposed to revert it if the profile was locked when I found out about my mistake, I didn’t have the proper permissions.

I guess maybe I should have asked to reopen it, I just thought someone else was going to because there was another Metal Sonic CRT that didn’t have the additions for it added yet before it was locked. My bad.
 
How was I supposed to revert it if the profile was locked when I found out about my mistake, I didn’t have the proper permissions.

I guess maybe I should have asked to reopen it, I just thought someone else was going to because there was another Metal Sonic CRT that didn’t have the additions for it added yet before it was locked. My bad.
Hmm. That seems like a valid point, but you should have asked for help in our all-purpose requests thread. 🙏
 
I should have. But I only found out about my mistake and the lack of staff votes today, from a message made at 2:30 AM when I was asleep, and by the time I woke up I was already reported. If I had known earlier I definitely would not have done it.
 
How was I supposed to revert it if the profile was locked when I found out about my mistake, I didn’t have the proper permissions.

I guess maybe I should have asked to reopen it, I just thought someone else was going to because there was another Metal Sonic CRT that didn’t have the additions for it added yet before it was locked. My bad.
There's a level of disbelief about how much one could have mistakenly added, but in this instance I find it feasible that the additions were made in error or misunderstanding. I don't think formal action is necessary, just be very careful in the future.
 
I am fine with Bambu's solution here. 🙏
 
I have asked about it. 🙏
Not to derail here, but shouldn't we do something like get in touch with the local authorities regarding this matter? Even if it's outside of the wiki here, I do think we have to do more for the well-being of our staff & users on here. I mean, I've had something similar happen to me once & it had a pretty bad impact on my mentality when it came to this site.
 
Last edited:
Not to derail here, but shouldn't we do something like get in touch with the local authorities regarding this matter? Even if it's outside of the wiki here, I do think we have to do more for the well-being of our staff & users on here. I mean, I've had the same thing happen to me once & it had a pretty bad impact on my mentality when it came to this site.
Well, the problem is that I do not know how to handle these types of legal matters, and also cannot file police reports to the authorities of nations others than my own, but if other people here have suggestions, I am obviously willing to listen. 🙏
 
GodlyCharmander wonders if he can please be forgiven and allowed to come back here. 🙏

https://community.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Antvasima?threadId=4400000000003760847
Ant... This was literally brought up literally twice, and rejected twice.

Appeal or not he still made a lot of socks and God only knows if he snuck in another one in the event of this other appeal being rejected.

It was mentioned in the first attempt I linked that any appeal should be invalid if he makes socks, and he did break his promise. Not to mention that as Topaz he did get multiple warnings and bans too iirc, so that's another reason to not accept.
 
Well, as you can see in the linked thread, he says that all that he is asking for is a finite ban length, and from what I recall, other than his final outburst, he used to behave quite well. 🙏
 
Well, as you can see in the linked thread, he says that all that he is asking for is a finite ban length, and from what I recall, other than his final outburst, he used to behave quite well. 🙏
In the last attempt I linked every staff disagreed with said appeal right because of him breaking the promise of not breaking any rule.

If staff now wants to give Charmander a second chance despite their previous disagreement, I won't stop it, but I'll just inform you that if the previous 2 times were rejected, the 3rd will mostly likely also be.
 
I don't consider leniency (as in, making his ban not permanent, not an immediate unbanning) out of the question, but people are right to point out the extreme lengths GodlyCharmander took to circumvent the ban as a reason to reject the request. One feels that a show of moral improvement would be needed, but given the depth of the hole they dug for themselves, it seems as though the options to display that are remarkably scant in availability. Basically, I'm open to the possibility that GodlyCharmander could have a reduced ban, but it would need some effort on their behalf, and the options to show that effort are low.
 
What do you all think about the following post? 🙏

I still do not believe that he's going to change his attitude knowing the fact that every time he's come back with a sock account, he has the same toxic attitude in the threads he's been in. So I still do not think he should be unbanned.
 
Back
Top