- 4,433
- 4,483
While the case of Tommy is pretty clear cut, it does look like Tyler just came along after to correct errors left on the page instead of actually changing the rating.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I can say "whats wrong with you", I don't know why you took that personally. Even if it was just for countering my points. Give the whole context.Talk to me? You've asked me multiple times "what's wrong with you?" for just countering your points.
Yes, I said I'll argue with Qawsed because arguing with you back and forth about the same thing is pointless.You accused me of derailing
Qawsed came to the thread, made his own conclusion while I was asleep and closed the thread without letting me reply.You asked Ant to reopen the thread after a conclusion had been reached, the conclusion being one Qawsed, the only staff member on the thread, agreed with. You're using the same arguments that have been countered while dismissing others for using "headcanon".
My first response already had my issues with you in it.Ok, if you have something against me, you'll have to file a detailed complain supporting everything you say in here.
The context was literally that you asked “what’s wrong with you?” because I countered your points in the thread.I can say "whats wrong with you", I don't know why you took that personally. Even if it was just for countering my points. Give the whole context.
There’s no “back and forth”. You didn’t prove your point, and you dismissed other’s arguments against it without actually countering anything.Yes, I said I'll argue with Qawsed because arguing with you back and forth about the same thing is pointless.
The conclusion he came to was literally what you agreed could be done. A change to the justification. There was literally no reason for you to reopen the thread.Qawsed came to the thread, made his own conclusion while I was asleep and closed the thread without letting me reply.
I have the right to debate in that thread and request to open it.
Is that the "insult" you were talking about?The context was literally that you asked “what’s wrong with you?” because I countered your points in the thread.
I think I countered whatever was needed to counter. This is as I said the case of you think your own personal opinion is a fact and whatever I say isn't a proof of anything, I might think the same about you.There’s no “back and forth”. You didn’t prove your point, and you dismissed other’s arguments against it without actually countering anything.
If I agreed to it then why would ask to reopen the thread and why would I reply to Qawsed's arguments?The conclusion he came to was literally what you agreed could be done. A change to the justification. There was literally no reason for you to reopen the thread.
I got reported in here for talking with him personally on his wall...May the both of you continue your argument in your respective message walls?
I blocked Tommy on my own earlier.The users Tyler akor and Tommy blade original have vandalized Maxwell's page, Putting him at Outversal+ and tier 0.
Here is the contributions that show them vandalizing the page
Thank you for doing that, though should we say anything to Tyler? I don't think he did anything malicious to warrant a warning but just a reminder or something about potential vandalism that can occurI blocked Tommy on my own earlier.
In the tier section, it said 1-A. Tyler bolded it.Please remind me what Tyler actually did in his edit.
Wait correct me if I'm wrong but isn't a rule violation to use alternative accounts to bypass blocks? (socks).He has two alternate accounts that appear to both be banned looking at his profile; as if he tried making alts but can't due to "One Email address" rule.
YesWait correct me if I'm wrong but isn't a rule violation to use alternative accounts to bypass blocks? (socks).
- Using sock-puppet handles is strongly forbidden, especially to circumvent blocks. Doing so will result in the block duration being greatly increased for all of the relevant accounts.
So should he be blocked?He has two alternate accounts that appear to both be banned looking at his profile; as if he tried making alts but can't due to "One Email address" rule.
Anyway, has any staff member told him to stop yet?It's come to my attention that this user keeps spam posting matches (mostly with a certain blue blur).
After voting on one of their Vs threads, I checked out their profile and well just check their contributions for the last 8 days.
I do think they harmless but it's getting frustrating dealing with the constant spam Vs matches (some of which are complete stomps) with the same character over and over again...
I feel like someone should at least ask them to chill with the constant mass Vs matches posting.