- 4,021
- 3,698
While the case of Tommy is pretty clear cut, it does look like Tyler just came along after to correct errors left on the page instead of actually changing the rating.
-
This forum is strictly intended to be used by members of the VS Battles wiki. Please only register if you have an autoconfirmed account there, as otherwise your registration will be rejected. If you have already registered once, do not do so again, and contact Antvasima if you encounter any problems.
For instructions regarding the exact procedure to sign up to this forum, please click here. -
We need Patreon donations for this forum to have all of its running costs financially secured.
Community members who help us out will receive badges that give them several different benefits, including the removal of all advertisements in this forum, but donations from non-members are also extremely appreciated.
Please click here for further information, or here to directly visit our Patreon donations page. -
Please click here for information about a large petition to help children in need.
Rule Violation Reports (New forum)
- Thread starter Antvasima
- Start date
- 5,941
- 7,487
That's fair, still wanted to bring that attention regardless just in case if he is innocent or not
- 4,451
- 1,947
Talk to me? You've asked me multiple times "what's wrong with you?" for just countering your points. You accused me of derailing. You asked Ant to reopen the thread after a conclusion had been reached, the conclusion being one Qawsed, the only staff member on the thread, agreed with. You're using the same arguments that have been countered while dismissing others for using "headcanon".
- 30,004
- 31,168
I think both of you seem somewhat harsh. Slacjow, it is fine to debate, but if a topic consists of a conclusion with multiple staff members in agreement. Then there's a limit to how pushy one can be or at least at that moment or come better prepared next time. And Axxtentacle, I haven't seen the original thread for more context, and maybe he said things much worse, but insulting people back isn't the best practice either. But anyway, could someone link the original thread, as the message wall didn't have much?
- 4,451
- 1,947
- 1,127
- 369
Ok, if you have something against me, you'll have to file a detailed complain supporting everything you say in here.
I have the right to debate in that thread and request to open it.
I can say "whats wrong with you", I don't know why you took that personally. Even if it was just for countering my points. Give the whole context.
Yes, I said I'll argue with Qawsed because arguing with you back and forth about the same thing is pointless.
Qawsed came to the thread, made his own conclusion while I was asleep and closed the thread without letting me reply.
I have the right to debate in that thread and request to open it.
- 4,451
- 1,947
The comment I made on the post wasn’t a good idea, and I’ll admit to that. I apologize, but I believe my other points still stand.
- 4,451
- 1,947
My first response already had my issues with you in it.
The context was literally that you asked “what’s wrong with you?” because I countered your points in the thread.
There’s no “back and forth”. You didn’t prove your point, and you dismissed other’s arguments against it without actually countering anything.
The conclusion he came to was literally what you agreed could be done. A change to the justification. There was literally no reason for you to reopen the thread.
- 1,127
- 369
Is that the "insult" you were talking about?
And you equate this with "take your head out of your ass"? Ridiculous.
I think I countered whatever was needed to counter. This is as I said the case of you think your own personal opinion is a fact and whatever I say isn't a proof of anything, I might think the same about you.
Again I repeat, I didn't want to argue back and forth with you, you think everything I say is false, I think everything you say is false. Whats the point in arguing? Qawsed is a staff member that supports OPM, I'll argue with him and we finish the debate. If we go back and forth with him also he can close the thread.
If I agreed to it then why would ask to reopen the thread and why would I reply to Qawsed's arguments?
The answer is that I wouldn't. I didn't agree with what you came up with.
- 4,451
- 1,947
You didn’t counter literally anything. You dismissed people for being “wrong” and using “unsupported fan theories”.
You upplay what I said, while downplaying what you said? Come on dude.
You didn’t “reply to Qawsed’s arguments” you repeated everything you already said and that I already addressed. Stonewalled. You then refused to counter my arguments against this, and accused me of derailing.
I’m going to stop responding to this, because this isn’t what the RvR thread is for.
You upplay what I said, while downplaying what you said? Come on dude.
You didn’t “reply to Qawsed’s arguments” you repeated everything you already said and that I already addressed. Stonewalled. You then refused to counter my arguments against this, and accused me of derailing.
I’m going to stop responding to this, because this isn’t what the RvR thread is for.
- 10,046
- 14,755
May the both of you continue your argument in your respective message walls?
- 30,004
- 31,168
Okay, I honestly didn't see anything RVR worthy in that thread, other than that the continued conversation shouldn't be here yes. And that both should try to remain civilized when debating.
- 1,127
- 369
I got reported in here for talking with him personally on his wall...
Anyway, that thread will be open until we resolved the issue with Qawsed.
- 4,942
- 1,316
- 165,138
- 72,062
- Thread starter
- #2,577
I blocked Tommy on my own earlier.
- 30,004
- 31,168
Blocked the sock
- 165,138
- 72,062
- Thread starter
- #2,579
I gave his original account an extended block (from 2 weeks to 2 months), and Medeus permanently blocked the other one.
- 5,941
- 7,487
Thank you for doing that, though should we say anything to Tyler? I don't think he did anything malicious to warrant a warning but just a reminder or something about potential vandalism that can occur
- 21,129
- 30,082
In the tier section, it said 1-A. Tyler bolded it.
Whoever didn't change the attack potency to fit the tier (AP said Multiversal while tier said Outerversal), he changed it to outerversal.
- 5,941
- 7,487
He didn't do anything wrong per say, just corrected some of the editing mistakes that Tommy put in. So I don't think he needs a warning at all, just maybe being told to be careful when it comes to any potential vandalism
- 5,761
- 8,029
It's come to my attention that this user keeps spam posting matches (mostly with a certain blue blur).
After voting on one of their Vs threads, I checked out their profile and well just check their contributions for the last 8 days.
I do think they harmless but it's getting frustrating dealing with the constant spam Vs matches (some of which are complete stomps) with the same character over and over again...
I feel like someone should at least ask them to chill with the constant mass Vs matches posting.
After voting on one of their Vs threads, I checked out their profile and well just check their contributions for the last 8 days.
I do think they harmless but it's getting frustrating dealing with the constant spam Vs matches (some of which are complete stomps) with the same character over and over again...
I feel like someone should at least ask them to chill with the constant mass Vs matches posting.
- 30,004
- 31,168
He has two alternate accounts that appear to both be banned looking at his profile; as if he tried making alts but can't due to "One Email address" rule.
- 5,761
- 8,029
Wait correct me if I'm wrong but isn't a rule violation to use alternative accounts to bypass blocks? (socks).
- 4,942
- 1,316
- 1,342
- 675
I fixed it but he did the same for Julius
- 18,667
- 5,863
Changes reverted, and blocked.
- 4,942
- 1,316
The user Michealdem17 literally reported my comment on this thread for saying it was a stomp (evidence)
- 30,004
- 31,168
That seems like a really weird report, but yeah, he shouldn't be reporting staff members for petty reasons like that.
- 4,942
- 1,316
I think he should probably be given a warning
- 30,004
- 31,168
I left him a friendly reminder.
- 14,685
- 20,425
So should he be blocked?
- 165,138
- 72,062
- 165,138
- 72,062
- Thread starter
- #2,600
Anyway, has any staff member told him to stop yet?
Similar threads
