ApiesDeathbyLazors
He/Him- 7,236
- 994
Same user went and cleared the whole page.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Oh, I was planning to after I locked the page. You were able do it quicker than I was able to.I blocked the vandal.
However, in the future, please make certain to properly revert to the version of a page right before vandalism was done to it via its history section, especially before you lock it, as I had to handle it this time.
I typically never vouch for a ban but in this case I'm gonna do that for once. He intentionally had users undo all of my edits after literal weeks of research and hours of editing.Yeah, I think they should have either a REALLY strict warning or a short ban.
More than that. Going through his contributions it seems like he's been making unapproved changes to the Toyko Ghoul Verse for literal years on his own accord. This has been going on since 2019 going by my research of his warnings and questioning in his contributions section.So this is a repeat offender, I'd say a month.
I've reverted them myself but I'm more upset based upon the principle of him undoing things that were accepted on his own without making a proper CRT.That's an actual dick move. Don't normal users have the ability to revert changes made to profiles, or can only content mods do that? If you don't have the patience to revert the changes, you could list how many profiles were changed hereand hope for the best.
We don't want to inconvenience the majority of non-vandalizing users just to stop a minority of trolls. And having to unlock and re-lock all profiles every single time a minor change is required would be putting too much extra unnecessary work for staff members.I swear to God this why all the profiles should be locked. The sooner we do that shit the sooner we have user's stop making mess of the ******* profiles. We consistently bitch about users vandalizing pages but we're the ones supplying them with the ammunition to do so in the first place.
It's almost like me lightning myself on fire then bitching about how the AC isn't turned on.
Was taking about the profiles I'm working with, but also as someone who's experienced in coding I can 100% guarantee you that there's a way to counteract everything you just said with simplicity. It doesn't take an awful lot to set up a security system that stops such acts from happening yet still allowing users to make non harmful edits.We don't want to inconvenience the majority of non-vandalizing users just to stop a minority of trolls. And having to unlock and re-lock all profiles every single time a minor change is required would be putting too much extra unnecessary work for staff members.
This is a repeat behavior, granted that the last time was less than a year ago but the fact still remains that by doing a quick search of his contributions you can see his previous offenses of editing profiles without a CRT. This isn't a normal adjustment of grammar or punctuation, but rather of stats, stats that he doesn't have the proper context of. I'm fine with strict warning, but I'd appreciate if the profiles were locked.I think a strict warning to the user should suffice. If he is working on some revision he can make a CRT, instead of reverting accepted edits.
Ant never got around to it. Ant questioned him here to which he never replied, yet again Ant questions him here to which even you replied with a lot of skepticism, and Ant brings it up here again. That makes 3 times in the span of three years for what could be considered vandalism. This current event would make it the 4th time, it's pretty clear to me that he's more than aware of the rules here but rather decides not to listen to them. This is a repeated offense, either a very strict warning or a short ban is required.I don't see dozen or so warnings in his user profile, so either I am missing something or he hasn't been warned before.
Was taking about the profiles I'm working with, but also as someone who's experienced in coding I can 100% guarantee you that there's a way to counteract everything you just said with simplicity. It doesn't take an awful lot to set up a security system that stops such acts from happening yet still allowing users to make non harmful edits.
I blocked him.This user vandalised this profile.
Members without accounts have not been able to edit the wiki since late 2014 or early 2015.Okay, what system to you have in mind?
Because the only basic system I can see being practical is preventing users who have no accounts from editing. That stops anonymous users from vandalizing the wiki, but doesn't do anything for regular users who have accounts.
Even after you gave him instructions all the way back to when he vandalized the Tokyo Ghoul pages, he still hasn't learned from his mistakes, and is making the same mess again.
He did that to Gol D. Roger too. It's all by this guyEdward Newgate (Whitebeard)
Edward Newgate, better known in life by his epithet "Whitebeard", was the captain of the Whitebeard Pirates and one of the Four Emperors ruling in the second half of the Grand Line, known as the New World. Born in the impoverished and lawless village of Sphinx in the New World, Newgate lost his...vsbattles.fandom.com
Vandalism